Meatal stenosis after surgical correction of short frenulum: Is the “pull-and-burn” method the way to go?

Background and Objectives: The surgical correction of a short frenulum includes several procedures that vary in complexity of the technique and the use of stitches, lasers, or skin grafts. However, little is known about the effect of these procedures on meatal stenosis. A possible association of fre...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kostis I Gyftopoulos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2018-01-01
Series:Urology Annals
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.urologyannals.com/article.asp?issn=0974-7796;year=2018;volume=10;issue=4;spage=354;epage=357;aulast=Gyftopoulos
id doaj-0e5b9fce13b44ed1ace9a8d5c942257b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0e5b9fce13b44ed1ace9a8d5c942257b2020-11-25T00:36:24ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsUrology Annals0974-77960974-78342018-01-0110435435710.4103/UA.UA_25_18Meatal stenosis after surgical correction of short frenulum: Is the “pull-and-burn” method the way to go?Kostis I GyftopoulosBackground and Objectives: The surgical correction of a short frenulum includes several procedures that vary in complexity of the technique and the use of stitches, lasers, or skin grafts. However, little is known about the effect of these procedures on meatal stenosis. A possible association of frenular artery trauma during circumcision and subsequent meatal stenosis has raised concerns regarding the importance of frenulum preservation. We hereby report our experience over 15 years of applying the “pull-and-burn” method for short frenulum correction. Patients and Methods: A total of 236 patients underwent the “pull-and-burn” procedure for short frenulum under local anesthesia on an outpatient basis between November 2002 and November 2017. The method is suture free and involves tearing the frenulum superficially and vertically by the aid of a low-power, high-frequency hyfrecator, avoiding the underlying frenular vessels. Patients were advised for a regular follow-up visit at 2–3 months postoperatively and were reviewed for symptoms and signs suggestive of meatal stenosis. Results: Follow-up files were available for 228 patients (96.6%). No symptoms suggestive of meatal stenosis (dysuria and stream pattern abnormalities) were reported by any patient. Examination of the urethral meatus revealed normal appearance, with no signs of edema or scarring in all the 228 patients. Conclusions: The “pull-and-burn” method is a simple and safe procedure for the correction of short frenulum that respects anatomically the delicate vasculature of the frenular area, resulting in the preservation of the integrity of the urethral meatus.http://www.urologyannals.com/article.asp?issn=0974-7796;year=2018;volume=10;issue=4;spage=354;epage=357;aulast=GyftopoulosAnatomyfrenuloplastyfrenulumstenosisurethra meatus
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kostis I Gyftopoulos
spellingShingle Kostis I Gyftopoulos
Meatal stenosis after surgical correction of short frenulum: Is the “pull-and-burn” method the way to go?
Urology Annals
Anatomy
frenuloplasty
frenulum
stenosis
urethra meatus
author_facet Kostis I Gyftopoulos
author_sort Kostis I Gyftopoulos
title Meatal stenosis after surgical correction of short frenulum: Is the “pull-and-burn” method the way to go?
title_short Meatal stenosis after surgical correction of short frenulum: Is the “pull-and-burn” method the way to go?
title_full Meatal stenosis after surgical correction of short frenulum: Is the “pull-and-burn” method the way to go?
title_fullStr Meatal stenosis after surgical correction of short frenulum: Is the “pull-and-burn” method the way to go?
title_full_unstemmed Meatal stenosis after surgical correction of short frenulum: Is the “pull-and-burn” method the way to go?
title_sort meatal stenosis after surgical correction of short frenulum: is the “pull-and-burn” method the way to go?
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Urology Annals
issn 0974-7796
0974-7834
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Background and Objectives: The surgical correction of a short frenulum includes several procedures that vary in complexity of the technique and the use of stitches, lasers, or skin grafts. However, little is known about the effect of these procedures on meatal stenosis. A possible association of frenular artery trauma during circumcision and subsequent meatal stenosis has raised concerns regarding the importance of frenulum preservation. We hereby report our experience over 15 years of applying the “pull-and-burn” method for short frenulum correction. Patients and Methods: A total of 236 patients underwent the “pull-and-burn” procedure for short frenulum under local anesthesia on an outpatient basis between November 2002 and November 2017. The method is suture free and involves tearing the frenulum superficially and vertically by the aid of a low-power, high-frequency hyfrecator, avoiding the underlying frenular vessels. Patients were advised for a regular follow-up visit at 2–3 months postoperatively and were reviewed for symptoms and signs suggestive of meatal stenosis. Results: Follow-up files were available for 228 patients (96.6%). No symptoms suggestive of meatal stenosis (dysuria and stream pattern abnormalities) were reported by any patient. Examination of the urethral meatus revealed normal appearance, with no signs of edema or scarring in all the 228 patients. Conclusions: The “pull-and-burn” method is a simple and safe procedure for the correction of short frenulum that respects anatomically the delicate vasculature of the frenular area, resulting in the preservation of the integrity of the urethral meatus.
topic Anatomy
frenuloplasty
frenulum
stenosis
urethra meatus
url http://www.urologyannals.com/article.asp?issn=0974-7796;year=2018;volume=10;issue=4;spage=354;epage=357;aulast=Gyftopoulos
work_keys_str_mv AT kostisigyftopoulos meatalstenosisaftersurgicalcorrectionofshortfrenulumisthepullandburnmethodthewaytogo
_version_ 1725305508599955456