Quel mode d’existence pour l’organisation ?
Existant literature on organizational action is hazy with respect to the precise way an organization may act. It tends to vacillate between the affirmation that the organization acts by itself and a reduction of organizational action to that of its members. In both cases, the organization is already...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Université du Québec à Montréal
2011-01-01
|
Series: | Communiquer |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journals.openedition.org/communiquer/430 |
id |
doaj-0e4aa02cf47c4ef3a38843a3ce65bbb5 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0e4aa02cf47c4ef3a38843a3ce65bbb52020-11-25T01:34:21ZengUniversité du Québec à MontréalCommuniquer 2368-95872011-01-015759210.4000/communiquer.430Quel mode d’existence pour l’organisation ?Nicolas BencherkiExistant literature on organizational action is hazy with respect to the precise way an organization may act. It tends to vacillate between the affirmation that the organization acts by itself and a reduction of organizational action to that of its members. In both cases, the organization is already presumed. I suggest here a properly communicational perspective, which explains organizational existence and its capacity to act in a single stroke. I do this by observing the situated language practices through which actions are attributed to the organization. This is done by analyzing an excerpt of a meeting of a committee in charge of planning the major reform of a French higher education institution.http://journals.openedition.org/communiquer/430organizational actiondelegationdis/incarnationmandatecommunicative constitution of organization |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Nicolas Bencherki |
spellingShingle |
Nicolas Bencherki Quel mode d’existence pour l’organisation ? Communiquer organizational action delegation dis/incarnation mandate communicative constitution of organization |
author_facet |
Nicolas Bencherki |
author_sort |
Nicolas Bencherki |
title |
Quel mode d’existence pour l’organisation ? |
title_short |
Quel mode d’existence pour l’organisation ? |
title_full |
Quel mode d’existence pour l’organisation ? |
title_fullStr |
Quel mode d’existence pour l’organisation ? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Quel mode d’existence pour l’organisation ? |
title_sort |
quel mode d’existence pour l’organisation ? |
publisher |
Université du Québec à Montréal |
series |
Communiquer |
issn |
2368-9587 |
publishDate |
2011-01-01 |
description |
Existant literature on organizational action is hazy with respect to the precise way an organization may act. It tends to vacillate between the affirmation that the organization acts by itself and a reduction of organizational action to that of its members. In both cases, the organization is already presumed. I suggest here a properly communicational perspective, which explains organizational existence and its capacity to act in a single stroke. I do this by observing the situated language practices through which actions are attributed to the organization. This is done by analyzing an excerpt of a meeting of a committee in charge of planning the major reform of a French higher education institution. |
topic |
organizational action delegation dis/incarnation mandate communicative constitution of organization |
url |
http://journals.openedition.org/communiquer/430 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nicolasbencherki quelmodedexistencepourlorganisation |
_version_ |
1725072936097808384 |