Reply to Roe and Baker's comment on "Another look at climate sensitivity" by Zaliapin and Ghil (2010)
G. H. Roe and M. B. Baker (hereafter R&B) claim that analysis of a global linear approximation to the climate system allows one to conclude that the quest for reliable climate predictions is futile. We insist that this quest is important and requires a proper understanding of the roles of bo...
Main Authors: | I. Zaliapin, M. Ghil |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2011-02-01
|
Series: | Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics |
Online Access: | http://www.nonlin-processes-geophys.net/18/129/2011/npg-18-129-2011.pdf |
Similar Items
-
Comment on "Another look at climate sensitivity" by Zaliapin and Ghil (2010)
by: G. H. Roe, et al.
Published: (2011-02-01) -
Another look at climate sensitivity
by: I. Zaliapin, et al.
Published: (2010-03-01) -
Aspects of the life and work of Rene Ghil
by: Daniel, Vera J.
Published: (1949) -
Reply to T. Schneider's comment on "Spatio-temporal filling of missing points in geophysical data sets"
by: D. Kondrashov, et al.
Published: (2007-01-01) -
Reply to Henriksson et al.'s comment on "Using multiple observationally-based constraints to estimate climate sensitivity" by Annan and Hargreaves (2010)
by: J. D. Annan, et al.
Published: (2011-06-01)