Reply to Roe and Baker's comment on "Another look at climate sensitivity" by Zaliapin and Ghil (2010)
G. H. Roe and M. B. Baker (hereafter R&B) claim that analysis of a global linear approximation to the climate system allows one to conclude that the quest for reliable climate predictions is futile. We insist that this quest is important and requires a proper understanding of the roles of bo...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2011-02-01
|
| Series: | Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics |
| Online Access: | http://www.nonlin-processes-geophys.net/18/129/2011/npg-18-129-2011.pdf |
| id |
doaj-0e45268217b34bcb9abc22ff3c995ee1 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
Article |
| spelling |
doaj-0e45268217b34bcb9abc22ff3c995ee12020-11-24T21:03:44ZengCopernicus PublicationsNonlinear Processes in Geophysics1023-58091607-79462011-02-0118112913110.5194/npg-18-129-2011Reply to Roe and Baker's comment on "Another look at climate sensitivity" by Zaliapin and Ghil (2010)I. ZaliapinM. GhilG. H. Roe and M. B. Baker (hereafter R&B) claim that analysis of a global linear approximation to the climate system allows one to conclude that the quest for reliable climate predictions is futile. We insist that this quest is important and requires a proper understanding of the roles of both linear and nonlinear methods in climate dynamics. http://www.nonlin-processes-geophys.net/18/129/2011/npg-18-129-2011.pdf |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
English |
| format |
Article |
| sources |
DOAJ |
| author |
I. Zaliapin M. Ghil |
| spellingShingle |
I. Zaliapin M. Ghil Reply to Roe and Baker's comment on "Another look at climate sensitivity" by Zaliapin and Ghil (2010) Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics |
| author_facet |
I. Zaliapin M. Ghil |
| author_sort |
I. Zaliapin |
| title |
Reply to Roe and Baker's comment on "Another look at climate sensitivity" by Zaliapin and Ghil (2010) |
| title_short |
Reply to Roe and Baker's comment on "Another look at climate sensitivity" by Zaliapin and Ghil (2010) |
| title_full |
Reply to Roe and Baker's comment on "Another look at climate sensitivity" by Zaliapin and Ghil (2010) |
| title_fullStr |
Reply to Roe and Baker's comment on "Another look at climate sensitivity" by Zaliapin and Ghil (2010) |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Reply to Roe and Baker's comment on "Another look at climate sensitivity" by Zaliapin and Ghil (2010) |
| title_sort |
reply to roe and baker's comment on "another look at climate sensitivity" by zaliapin and ghil (2010) |
| publisher |
Copernicus Publications |
| series |
Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics |
| issn |
1023-5809 1607-7946 |
| publishDate |
2011-02-01 |
| description |
G. H. Roe and M. B. Baker (hereafter R&B) claim that analysis of a global linear approximation to the climate system allows one to conclude that the quest for reliable climate predictions is futile. We insist that this quest is important and requires a proper understanding of the roles of both linear and nonlinear methods in climate dynamics. |
| url |
http://www.nonlin-processes-geophys.net/18/129/2011/npg-18-129-2011.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT izaliapin replytoroeandbakerscommentonanotherlookatclimatesensitivitybyzaliapinandghil2010 AT mghil replytoroeandbakerscommentonanotherlookatclimatesensitivitybyzaliapinandghil2010 |
| _version_ |
1716773190737330176 |