Improving behavior characteristics and stress indices of gestating sows housed with group housing facility
This study was conducted to investigate the effects of group-housing facility (GHF), compared to an individual confinement stall (CON), on the reproductive performance, behavior, and stress hormones of gestating sows. A total of 50 primipar...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Korean Society of Animal Sciences and Technology
2020-11-01
|
Series: | Journal of Animal Science and Technology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.ejast.org/archive/view_article?pid=jast-62-6-875 |
Summary: | This study was conducted to investigate the effects of group-housing facility
(GHF), compared to an individual confinement stall (CON), on the reproductive
performance, behavior, and stress hormones of gestating sows. A total of 50
primiparous sows (Landrace × Yorkshire) were randomly allocated into
either CON (n = 25) or GHF (n = 25) during the gestation period. One week before
parturition, the sows were transferred into conventional farrowing crates, and
cross-fostering was conducted within 1 d of delivery. Blood was collected for
analyses of stress indices at 75 d of gestation and postpartum. Reproductive
performance was estimated during the period of birth to weaning. Behavior
patterns were identified at 90 d of gestation. Litter size was not different
between the CON and GHF treatments. Weaning to estrus interval, however, tended
to be lower in the GHF than in the CON (p < 0.1). Activity,
treating, belly nosing, and exploring behaviors were observed only in the GHF
group, whereas rubbing was shown only with the CON. Serum cortisol concentration
was lower in the GHF than in the CON at 75 d of gestation (p
< 0.05). Sows housed in the GHF showed lower epinephrine and norepinephrine
concentrations than those housed in the CON at postpartum (p
< 0.05). The GHF sows demonstrated more natural behavior characteristics
associated with stress relief than the CON sows with no adverse effects on
reproductive performance. Therefore, these results suggest that GHF could be
applied as an alternative housing facility to improve animal welfare on swine
farms. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2672-0191 2055-0391 |