Venipuncture-related lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve injury: what to know?

Background and objectives: Venipuncture is one of the most common procedures performed in daily anesthetic practice. Though usually innocuous, peripheral nerve injuries with serious sequelae have been described following venipuncture. We present a case of venipuncture-related lateral antebrachial cu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Juan A. Ramos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2014-03-01
Series:Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001413001371
id doaj-0e08ea9280fb4596a1affba861b09295
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0e08ea9280fb4596a1affba861b092952020-11-24T22:16:57ZengElsevierBrazilian Journal of Anesthesiology0104-00142014-03-01642131133Venipuncture-related lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve injury: what to know?Juan A. Ramos0Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, United StatesBackground and objectives: Venipuncture is one of the most common procedures performed in daily anesthetic practice. Though usually innocuous, peripheral nerve injuries with serious sequelae have been described following venipuncture. We present a case of venipuncture-related lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve injury, alongside the essential diagnostic and prognostic information for day to day practice. Case: 27-Year old male who underwent venipuncture of the right antecubital fossa with a 20-gauge needle, for routine metabolic assessment. The patient suffered a shooting, electric-type pain traveling on the lateral side of the forearm, from the antecubital fossa proximally, to the right lateral wrist and base of the right thumb. After 24 h, the patient still experienced shooting, electric-type pain that was rated as 8/10 at the right distal lateral arm, right lateral wrist and base of the thumb, accompanied by paresthesia. The literature was reviewed and the patient was counseled regarding published outcomes of these type of injuries. At follow-up, the patient stated that the dysesthesia subsided approximately 3–4 weeks after initial injury, and reported no remaining neurologic deficits. Conclusions: Peripheral nerve injuries have been described after venipuncture, but the literature is limited. Nerves in the antecubital fossa classically lie on a plane just beneath, and in close proximity to, the veins, making them susceptible to injury during phlebotomy; also it has been shown that there is a large range of anatomic variation, suggesting that even a non-traumatic, satisfactory venipuncture can directly damage these nerves. Anesthesiologists must be aware of this possible complication, diagnosis and prognostication to adequately counsel patients in the event that this complication occurs. Keywords: Peripheral nerve injuries, Phlebotomy, Informed consenthttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001413001371
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Juan A. Ramos
spellingShingle Juan A. Ramos
Venipuncture-related lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve injury: what to know?
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
author_facet Juan A. Ramos
author_sort Juan A. Ramos
title Venipuncture-related lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve injury: what to know?
title_short Venipuncture-related lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve injury: what to know?
title_full Venipuncture-related lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve injury: what to know?
title_fullStr Venipuncture-related lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve injury: what to know?
title_full_unstemmed Venipuncture-related lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve injury: what to know?
title_sort venipuncture-related lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve injury: what to know?
publisher Elsevier
series Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
issn 0104-0014
publishDate 2014-03-01
description Background and objectives: Venipuncture is one of the most common procedures performed in daily anesthetic practice. Though usually innocuous, peripheral nerve injuries with serious sequelae have been described following venipuncture. We present a case of venipuncture-related lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve injury, alongside the essential diagnostic and prognostic information for day to day practice. Case: 27-Year old male who underwent venipuncture of the right antecubital fossa with a 20-gauge needle, for routine metabolic assessment. The patient suffered a shooting, electric-type pain traveling on the lateral side of the forearm, from the antecubital fossa proximally, to the right lateral wrist and base of the right thumb. After 24 h, the patient still experienced shooting, electric-type pain that was rated as 8/10 at the right distal lateral arm, right lateral wrist and base of the thumb, accompanied by paresthesia. The literature was reviewed and the patient was counseled regarding published outcomes of these type of injuries. At follow-up, the patient stated that the dysesthesia subsided approximately 3–4 weeks after initial injury, and reported no remaining neurologic deficits. Conclusions: Peripheral nerve injuries have been described after venipuncture, but the literature is limited. Nerves in the antecubital fossa classically lie on a plane just beneath, and in close proximity to, the veins, making them susceptible to injury during phlebotomy; also it has been shown that there is a large range of anatomic variation, suggesting that even a non-traumatic, satisfactory venipuncture can directly damage these nerves. Anesthesiologists must be aware of this possible complication, diagnosis and prognostication to adequately counsel patients in the event that this complication occurs. Keywords: Peripheral nerve injuries, Phlebotomy, Informed consent
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001413001371
work_keys_str_mv AT juanaramos venipuncturerelatedlateralantebrachialcutaneousnerveinjurywhattoknow
_version_ 1725787390137597952