Fit for fight – self-reported health in military women: a cross-sectional study

Abstract Background Substantial research has found that women assess their health as poor relative to men, but the reasons for this are not fully understood. Military women are characterised by good health and the ability to work in an archetypically male culture. Thus, studies on the gender pattern...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elin Anita Fadum, Leif Åge Strand, Monica Martinussen, Laila Breidvik, Nina Isaksen, Einar Borud
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-10-01
Series:BMC Women's Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12905-019-0820-4
id doaj-0dfccc30036b4d50908ffa0be55e9af2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0dfccc30036b4d50908ffa0be55e9af22020-11-25T01:40:32ZengBMCBMC Women's Health1472-68742019-10-0119111310.1186/s12905-019-0820-4Fit for fight – self-reported health in military women: a cross-sectional studyElin Anita Fadum0Leif Åge Strand1Monica Martinussen2Laila Breidvik3Nina Isaksen4Einar Borud5Institute of Military Medicine and Epidemiology, Norwegian Armed Forces Joint Medical ServicesInstitute of Military Medicine and Epidemiology, Norwegian Armed Forces Joint Medical ServicesRKBU North, UiT The Arctic University of NorwayInstitute of Military Medicine and Epidemiology, Norwegian Armed Forces Joint Medical ServicesThe Norwegian Defence University CollegeInstitute of Military Medicine and Epidemiology, Norwegian Armed Forces Joint Medical ServicesAbstract Background Substantial research has found that women assess their health as poor relative to men, but the reasons for this are not fully understood. Military women are characterised by good health and the ability to work in an archetypically male culture. Thus, studies on the gender pattern of self-reported health in military personnel could generate hypotheses for future research on the possible associations between gender and health. However, such studies are rare and limited to a few countries. The aim of this study was to examine self-reported physical and mental health in Norwegian military women. Methods We compared responses on self-reported health of 1068 active duty military women in Norway to those of active duty military men (n = 8100). Further, we compared the military women to civilian women working in the Norwegian Armed Forces (n = 1081). Participants were stratified into three age groups: 20–29; 30–39; and 40–60 years. We used Pearson Chi-square tests, Students t-tests and regression models to assess differences between the groups. Results The military women in our study reported physical illness and injuries equal to those of military men, but more military women used pain relieving and psychotropic drugs. More military women aged 20–29 and 30–39 years reported mental health issues than military men of the same age. In the age group 30–39 years, twice as many military women assessed their health as poor compared to military men. In the age group 40–60 years, more military women than men reported musculoskeletal pain. Military women used less smokeless tobacco than military men, but there were few differences in alcohol consumption and smoking. Military women appeared to be more physically healthy than civilian women, but we found few differences in mental health between these two groups. Conclusion Most military women reported physical symptoms equal to those of military men, but there were differences between the genders in mental health and drug use. More favourable health compared to civilian women was most evident in the youngest age group and did not apply to mental health.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12905-019-0820-4NorwaySelf-reported healthMilitaryFemaleSurveys
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Elin Anita Fadum
Leif Åge Strand
Monica Martinussen
Laila Breidvik
Nina Isaksen
Einar Borud
spellingShingle Elin Anita Fadum
Leif Åge Strand
Monica Martinussen
Laila Breidvik
Nina Isaksen
Einar Borud
Fit for fight – self-reported health in military women: a cross-sectional study
BMC Women's Health
Norway
Self-reported health
Military
Female
Surveys
author_facet Elin Anita Fadum
Leif Åge Strand
Monica Martinussen
Laila Breidvik
Nina Isaksen
Einar Borud
author_sort Elin Anita Fadum
title Fit for fight – self-reported health in military women: a cross-sectional study
title_short Fit for fight – self-reported health in military women: a cross-sectional study
title_full Fit for fight – self-reported health in military women: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Fit for fight – self-reported health in military women: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Fit for fight – self-reported health in military women: a cross-sectional study
title_sort fit for fight – self-reported health in military women: a cross-sectional study
publisher BMC
series BMC Women's Health
issn 1472-6874
publishDate 2019-10-01
description Abstract Background Substantial research has found that women assess their health as poor relative to men, but the reasons for this are not fully understood. Military women are characterised by good health and the ability to work in an archetypically male culture. Thus, studies on the gender pattern of self-reported health in military personnel could generate hypotheses for future research on the possible associations between gender and health. However, such studies are rare and limited to a few countries. The aim of this study was to examine self-reported physical and mental health in Norwegian military women. Methods We compared responses on self-reported health of 1068 active duty military women in Norway to those of active duty military men (n = 8100). Further, we compared the military women to civilian women working in the Norwegian Armed Forces (n = 1081). Participants were stratified into three age groups: 20–29; 30–39; and 40–60 years. We used Pearson Chi-square tests, Students t-tests and regression models to assess differences between the groups. Results The military women in our study reported physical illness and injuries equal to those of military men, but more military women used pain relieving and psychotropic drugs. More military women aged 20–29 and 30–39 years reported mental health issues than military men of the same age. In the age group 30–39 years, twice as many military women assessed their health as poor compared to military men. In the age group 40–60 years, more military women than men reported musculoskeletal pain. Military women used less smokeless tobacco than military men, but there were few differences in alcohol consumption and smoking. Military women appeared to be more physically healthy than civilian women, but we found few differences in mental health between these two groups. Conclusion Most military women reported physical symptoms equal to those of military men, but there were differences between the genders in mental health and drug use. More favourable health compared to civilian women was most evident in the youngest age group and did not apply to mental health.
topic Norway
Self-reported health
Military
Female
Surveys
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12905-019-0820-4
work_keys_str_mv AT elinanitafadum fitforfightselfreportedhealthinmilitarywomenacrosssectionalstudy
AT leifagestrand fitforfightselfreportedhealthinmilitarywomenacrosssectionalstudy
AT monicamartinussen fitforfightselfreportedhealthinmilitarywomenacrosssectionalstudy
AT lailabreidvik fitforfightselfreportedhealthinmilitarywomenacrosssectionalstudy
AT ninaisaksen fitforfightselfreportedhealthinmilitarywomenacrosssectionalstudy
AT einarborud fitforfightselfreportedhealthinmilitarywomenacrosssectionalstudy
_version_ 1725045113308053504