| Summary: | <h4>Introduction</h4>China has made considerable progress with health system reforms in recent years. Rural China, however, has lagged behind as the diversity of needs of China's 3,000 rural counties were not always well addressed by national top-down reforms. China's Rural Health Reform Project Health XI (HXI) piloted a hybrid process of top down and bottom up implementation of health system reforms which were tailored to rural county level needs and covered a population of more than 21 million. Different studies provide evidence that HXI counties have achieved substantial benefits given the relatively limited investment. The Effectiveness of HXI subsequently raises the question how the hybrid approach may have resulted in effective implementation of interventions. We answer this question to advance understanding of hybrid approaches in general and in the rural Chinese context in particular, where the bottom-up elements might match poorly with the traditional organisational culture and learning style.<h4>Materials & methods</h4>We conducted an in-depth qualitative analysis in three 'best practice' counties, performing document-analyses, observations, semi-structured individual and group interviews. In alignment with the research question, this study is of an explorative nature and follows a sequence of deductive and inductive steps.<h4>Results</h4>HXI struggled initially as counties had difficulties to take initiative and autonomously select and adapt their own reforms. The initial reforms required multiple improvement iterations before achieving the planned results. The effectiveness of these bottom up reform processes has been aided by tight top down supervision and extensive domestic expert involvement. County level leadership is seen as essential to align the top down and bottom up structures and processes. Where successful, HXI has changed mind-sets and counties developed generic health improvement capabilities.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Tailoring innovations to fit local needs formed a severe challenge for the three 'best practice' counties studied. A 'change of mindset' to actively take initiative and assume autonomy was needed to advance. Top down supervision and extensive support of experts was required to overcome the barriers. The studied counties finally achieved sustainable improvements and developed double loop learning capabilities beyond HXI objectives. Taken together, the above findings suggest that the continuum of healthcare reform implementation approaches in which hybrid approaches reside-from bottom up to top down-has two dimensions: a content dimension and a procedural dimension. Enabled by top down procedures, counties were able to bottom up tailor the content of best practice innovations to fit local needs.
|
|---|
