Reality Monitoring: A Meta-analytical Review for Forensic Practice

Reality Monitoring (RM) criteria has been proposed as a forensic tool in order to discern between perceived and imagined memories. However, no systematic evidence has been provided on its validity for use in testimony evaluation. Thus, a meta-analytic review was designed to study its validity in for...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yurena Gancedo, Francisca Fariña, Dolores Seijo, Manuel Vilariño, Ramón Arce
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedad Española de Psicología Jurídica y Forense 2021-07-01
Series:European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context
Subjects:
Online Access: https://journals.copmadrid.org/ejpalc/art/ejpalc2021a10
id doaj-0df91cddb16347718a95cacdfe4eedfe
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0df91cddb16347718a95cacdfe4eedfe2021-07-29T15:45:21ZengSociedad Española de Psicología Jurídica y ForenseEuropean Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context1889-18611989-40072021-07-011329911010.5093/ejpalc2021a1011320559Reality Monitoring: A Meta-analytical Review for Forensic PracticeYurena Gancedo0Francisca Fariña1Dolores Seijo2Manuel Vilariño3Ramón Arce4Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela , Spain, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, SpainUniversidad de Vigo, Vigo , Spain, Universidad de Vigo, SpainUniversidad de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela , Spain, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, SpainUniversidad de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela , Spain, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, SpainUniversidad de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela , Spain, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, SpainReality Monitoring (RM) criteria has been proposed as a forensic tool in order to discern between perceived and imagined memories. However, no systematic evidence has been provided on its validity for use in testimony evaluation. Thus, a meta-analytic review was designed to study its validity in forensic setting. A total of 40 primary studies were found, yielding 251 effect sizes. Random-effects meta-analyses correcting the effect size for sampling error and criterion unreliability were performed. The results showed that the total RM score discriminated, d = 0.542 (δ = 0.562), between imagined and perceived memories of events. In relation to individual criteria, the results showed support for the model’s predictions (more external attributes in perceived memories) for clarity, d = 0.361 (δ = 0.399), sensory information, d = 0.359 (δ = 0.397), spatial information, d = 0.250 (δ = 0.277), time information, d = 0.509 (δ = 0.563), reconstructability of the story, d = 0.441 (δ = 0.488), and realism, d = 0.420 (δ = 0.464), but not for affective information, d = 0.024 [-0.081, 0.129]. Nevertheless, except for temporal information, the results are not generalized (negative effects may be found). For cognitive operations, the results corroborated, although the magnitude of the effect was lower than small, the hypothesis (more cognitive operations in imagined memories), d = -0.107 [-0.178, -0.036] (δ = -0.119). The moderating effects of age (more cognitive operations on imagined memories in adults, and on perceived memories in underage), evocation type (external attributes discern between imagined and perceived memories, in both self-experienced and non-experimented accounts), and criteria score (the results varied by score) moderators were studied. As conclusions, forensic implications for the validity of the RM technique in court proceedings are discussed. https://journals.copmadrid.org/ejpalc/art/ejpalc2021a10 imagined memoriesperceived memoriesforensic assessmentwitness credibilityreality monitoring
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yurena Gancedo
Francisca Fariña
Dolores Seijo
Manuel Vilariño
Ramón Arce
spellingShingle Yurena Gancedo
Francisca Fariña
Dolores Seijo
Manuel Vilariño
Ramón Arce
Reality Monitoring: A Meta-analytical Review for Forensic Practice
European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context
imagined memories
perceived memories
forensic assessment
witness credibility
reality monitoring
author_facet Yurena Gancedo
Francisca Fariña
Dolores Seijo
Manuel Vilariño
Ramón Arce
author_sort Yurena Gancedo
title Reality Monitoring: A Meta-analytical Review for Forensic Practice
title_short Reality Monitoring: A Meta-analytical Review for Forensic Practice
title_full Reality Monitoring: A Meta-analytical Review for Forensic Practice
title_fullStr Reality Monitoring: A Meta-analytical Review for Forensic Practice
title_full_unstemmed Reality Monitoring: A Meta-analytical Review for Forensic Practice
title_sort reality monitoring: a meta-analytical review for forensic practice
publisher Sociedad Española de Psicología Jurídica y Forense
series European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context
issn 1889-1861
1989-4007
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Reality Monitoring (RM) criteria has been proposed as a forensic tool in order to discern between perceived and imagined memories. However, no systematic evidence has been provided on its validity for use in testimony evaluation. Thus, a meta-analytic review was designed to study its validity in forensic setting. A total of 40 primary studies were found, yielding 251 effect sizes. Random-effects meta-analyses correcting the effect size for sampling error and criterion unreliability were performed. The results showed that the total RM score discriminated, d = 0.542 (δ = 0.562), between imagined and perceived memories of events. In relation to individual criteria, the results showed support for the model’s predictions (more external attributes in perceived memories) for clarity, d = 0.361 (δ = 0.399), sensory information, d = 0.359 (δ = 0.397), spatial information, d = 0.250 (δ = 0.277), time information, d = 0.509 (δ = 0.563), reconstructability of the story, d = 0.441 (δ = 0.488), and realism, d = 0.420 (δ = 0.464), but not for affective information, d = 0.024 [-0.081, 0.129]. Nevertheless, except for temporal information, the results are not generalized (negative effects may be found). For cognitive operations, the results corroborated, although the magnitude of the effect was lower than small, the hypothesis (more cognitive operations in imagined memories), d = -0.107 [-0.178, -0.036] (δ = -0.119). The moderating effects of age (more cognitive operations on imagined memories in adults, and on perceived memories in underage), evocation type (external attributes discern between imagined and perceived memories, in both self-experienced and non-experimented accounts), and criteria score (the results varied by score) moderators were studied. As conclusions, forensic implications for the validity of the RM technique in court proceedings are discussed.
topic imagined memories
perceived memories
forensic assessment
witness credibility
reality monitoring
url https://journals.copmadrid.org/ejpalc/art/ejpalc2021a10
work_keys_str_mv AT yurenagancedo realitymonitoringametaanalyticalreviewforforensicpractice
AT franciscafarina realitymonitoringametaanalyticalreviewforforensicpractice
AT doloresseijo realitymonitoringametaanalyticalreviewforforensicpractice
AT manuelvilarino realitymonitoringametaanalyticalreviewforforensicpractice
AT ramonarce realitymonitoringametaanalyticalreviewforforensicpractice
_version_ 1721248544641253376