Main differences between the first and second waves of COVID-19 in Madrid, Spain

Background: The emergence and rapid global spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) represents a major challenge to health services, and has disrupted social and economic activities worldwide. In Spain, the first pandemic wave started in mid-March 2020 and lasted for 3...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vicente Soriano, Pilar Ganado-Pinilla, Miguel Sanchez-Santos, Felix Gómez-Gallego, Pablo Barreiro, Carmen de Mendoza, Octavio Corral
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-04-01
Series:International Journal of Infectious Diseases
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971221002010
id doaj-0de3c8ebd03a4f988047d7fd20c9ce45
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0de3c8ebd03a4f988047d7fd20c9ce452021-04-26T05:54:38ZengElsevierInternational Journal of Infectious Diseases1201-97122021-04-01105374376Main differences between the first and second waves of COVID-19 in Madrid, SpainVicente Soriano0Pilar Ganado-Pinilla1Miguel Sanchez-Santos2Felix Gómez-Gallego3Pablo Barreiro4Carmen de Mendoza5Octavio Corral6UNIR Health Sciences School and Medical Centre, Madrid, Spain; Corresponding author at: UNIR Health Sciences School and Medical Centre, Calle Almansa 101, Madrid, 28040, Spain.UNIR Health Sciences School and Medical Centre, Madrid, SpainUNIR Health Sciences School and Medical Centre, Madrid, SpainUNIR Health Sciences School and Medical Centre, Madrid, SpainConsejeria de Sanidad, Comunidad Autónoma, Madrid, SpainPuerta de Hierro Research Institute and University Hospital, Madrid, SpainUNIR Health Sciences School and Medical Centre, Madrid, SpainBackground: The emergence and rapid global spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) represents a major challenge to health services, and has disrupted social and economic activities worldwide. In Spain, the first pandemic wave started in mid-March 2020 and lasted for 3 months, requiring home confinement and strict lockdown. Following relaxation of the measures during the summer, a second wave commenced in mid-September 2020 and extended until Christmas 2020. Methods: The two pandemic waves were compared using information collected from rapid diagnostic tests and polymerase chain reaction assays at one university clinic in Madrid, the epicentre of the pandemic in Spain. Results: In total, 1569 individuals (968 during the first wave and 601 during the second wave) were tested for SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies using fingerprick capillary blood. In addition, during the second wave, 346 individuals were tested for SARS-CoV-2-specific antigen using either oral swabs or saliva. The overall seroprevalence of first-time-tested individuals was 12.6% during the first wave and 7.7% during the second wave (P < 0.01). Seroconversions and seroreversions within 6 months occurred at low rates, both below 5%. During the second wave, 3.5% of tested individuals were SARS-CoV-2 antigen positive, with two cases considered as re-infections. Severe clinical symptoms occurred in a greater proportion of cases during the first wave compared with the second wave (27.8% vs 10.6%, respectively; P = 0.03). Conclusion: The cumulative seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Madrid at the end of 2020 was approximately 20%. Seroreversions within 6 months occurred in 4% of cases. Seroconversions and re-infections were clinically less severe during the second wave than during the first wave. Hypothetically, a lower viral inoculum as a result of social distancing, increased use of face masks, promotion of outdoor activities and restrictions on gatherings may have contributed to this lower pathogenicity.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971221002010CoronavirusSARS-CoV-2AntibodiesRe-infectionsPrevalence
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Vicente Soriano
Pilar Ganado-Pinilla
Miguel Sanchez-Santos
Felix Gómez-Gallego
Pablo Barreiro
Carmen de Mendoza
Octavio Corral
spellingShingle Vicente Soriano
Pilar Ganado-Pinilla
Miguel Sanchez-Santos
Felix Gómez-Gallego
Pablo Barreiro
Carmen de Mendoza
Octavio Corral
Main differences between the first and second waves of COVID-19 in Madrid, Spain
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
Coronavirus
SARS-CoV-2
Antibodies
Re-infections
Prevalence
author_facet Vicente Soriano
Pilar Ganado-Pinilla
Miguel Sanchez-Santos
Felix Gómez-Gallego
Pablo Barreiro
Carmen de Mendoza
Octavio Corral
author_sort Vicente Soriano
title Main differences between the first and second waves of COVID-19 in Madrid, Spain
title_short Main differences between the first and second waves of COVID-19 in Madrid, Spain
title_full Main differences between the first and second waves of COVID-19 in Madrid, Spain
title_fullStr Main differences between the first and second waves of COVID-19 in Madrid, Spain
title_full_unstemmed Main differences between the first and second waves of COVID-19 in Madrid, Spain
title_sort main differences between the first and second waves of covid-19 in madrid, spain
publisher Elsevier
series International Journal of Infectious Diseases
issn 1201-9712
publishDate 2021-04-01
description Background: The emergence and rapid global spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) represents a major challenge to health services, and has disrupted social and economic activities worldwide. In Spain, the first pandemic wave started in mid-March 2020 and lasted for 3 months, requiring home confinement and strict lockdown. Following relaxation of the measures during the summer, a second wave commenced in mid-September 2020 and extended until Christmas 2020. Methods: The two pandemic waves were compared using information collected from rapid diagnostic tests and polymerase chain reaction assays at one university clinic in Madrid, the epicentre of the pandemic in Spain. Results: In total, 1569 individuals (968 during the first wave and 601 during the second wave) were tested for SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies using fingerprick capillary blood. In addition, during the second wave, 346 individuals were tested for SARS-CoV-2-specific antigen using either oral swabs or saliva. The overall seroprevalence of first-time-tested individuals was 12.6% during the first wave and 7.7% during the second wave (P < 0.01). Seroconversions and seroreversions within 6 months occurred at low rates, both below 5%. During the second wave, 3.5% of tested individuals were SARS-CoV-2 antigen positive, with two cases considered as re-infections. Severe clinical symptoms occurred in a greater proportion of cases during the first wave compared with the second wave (27.8% vs 10.6%, respectively; P = 0.03). Conclusion: The cumulative seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Madrid at the end of 2020 was approximately 20%. Seroreversions within 6 months occurred in 4% of cases. Seroconversions and re-infections were clinically less severe during the second wave than during the first wave. Hypothetically, a lower viral inoculum as a result of social distancing, increased use of face masks, promotion of outdoor activities and restrictions on gatherings may have contributed to this lower pathogenicity.
topic Coronavirus
SARS-CoV-2
Antibodies
Re-infections
Prevalence
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971221002010
work_keys_str_mv AT vicentesoriano maindifferencesbetweenthefirstandsecondwavesofcovid19inmadridspain
AT pilarganadopinilla maindifferencesbetweenthefirstandsecondwavesofcovid19inmadridspain
AT miguelsanchezsantos maindifferencesbetweenthefirstandsecondwavesofcovid19inmadridspain
AT felixgomezgallego maindifferencesbetweenthefirstandsecondwavesofcovid19inmadridspain
AT pablobarreiro maindifferencesbetweenthefirstandsecondwavesofcovid19inmadridspain
AT carmendemendoza maindifferencesbetweenthefirstandsecondwavesofcovid19inmadridspain
AT octaviocorral maindifferencesbetweenthefirstandsecondwavesofcovid19inmadridspain
_version_ 1721508009075539968