Application in a biomonitoring context of three-spined stickleback immunomarker reference ranges
The relevance of a biomarker for biomonitoring programs was influenced both by the knowledge on biomarker natural inter-individual and site variabilities and by the sensitivity of the biomarker towards environmental perturbations. To minimize data misinterpretation, robustness reference values for b...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2021-10-01
|
Series: | Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147651321006928 |
id |
doaj-0dce50e5a1ef49ad84a773711efae7bd |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0dce50e5a1ef49ad84a773711efae7bd2021-08-18T04:20:21ZengElsevierEcotoxicology and Environmental Safety0147-65132021-10-01223112580Application in a biomonitoring context of three-spined stickleback immunomarker reference rangesAdrien Marchand0Cleo Tebby1Audrey Catteau2Cyril Turiès3Jean-Marc Porcher4Anne Bado-Nilles5Institut National de l′Environnement Industriel et des Risques (INERIS), UMR-I 02 SEBIO, Parc Technologique Alata, BP 2, 60550 Verneuil-en-Halatte, FranceINERIS, Unit of Models for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology (METO), Parc Technologique Alata, BP 2, 60550 Verneuil-en-Halatte, FranceInstitut National de l′Environnement Industriel et des Risques (INERIS), UMR-I 02 SEBIO, Parc Technologique Alata, BP 2, 60550 Verneuil-en-Halatte, FranceInstitut National de l′Environnement Industriel et des Risques (INERIS), UMR-I 02 SEBIO, Parc Technologique Alata, BP 2, 60550 Verneuil-en-Halatte, FranceInstitut National de l′Environnement Industriel et des Risques (INERIS), UMR-I 02 SEBIO, Parc Technologique Alata, BP 2, 60550 Verneuil-en-Halatte, FranceInstitut National de l′Environnement Industriel et des Risques (INERIS), UMR-I 02 SEBIO, Parc Technologique Alata, BP 2, 60550 Verneuil-en-Halatte, France; Corresponding author.The relevance of a biomarker for biomonitoring programs was influenced both by the knowledge on biomarker natural inter-individual and site variabilities and by the sensitivity of the biomarker towards environmental perturbations. To minimize data misinterpretation, robustness reference values for biomarkers were important in biomonitoring programs. Specific three-spined stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus, immune reference ranges for field studies had been determined based on laboratory data and one reference station (Contentieuse river at Houdancourt). In this study, data obtained in one uncontaminated and three contaminated sites were compared to these reference ranges as a validation step before considering them for larger scale biomonitoring programs. When the field reference range were compared to data from the uncontaminated station (Béronelle), only few deviations were shown. In this way, data coming from uncontaminated station (Béronelle) was integrated in the field reference ranges to improve the evaluation of site variability. The new field reference ranges provided better discrimination of sites and spanned a larger range of fish lengths than the initial reference ranges. Furthermore, the results suggest lysosomal presence during several months and phagocytosis capacity in autumn may be the most relevant immunomarkers towards identifying contaminated sites. In the future, combining this reference value approach with active biomonitoring could facilitate the obtention of data in multiple stream conditions.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147651321006928field reference valuesBiomonitoringFishInnate immunityConfounding factors |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Adrien Marchand Cleo Tebby Audrey Catteau Cyril Turiès Jean-Marc Porcher Anne Bado-Nilles |
spellingShingle |
Adrien Marchand Cleo Tebby Audrey Catteau Cyril Turiès Jean-Marc Porcher Anne Bado-Nilles Application in a biomonitoring context of three-spined stickleback immunomarker reference ranges Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety field reference values Biomonitoring Fish Innate immunity Confounding factors |
author_facet |
Adrien Marchand Cleo Tebby Audrey Catteau Cyril Turiès Jean-Marc Porcher Anne Bado-Nilles |
author_sort |
Adrien Marchand |
title |
Application in a biomonitoring context of three-spined stickleback immunomarker reference ranges |
title_short |
Application in a biomonitoring context of three-spined stickleback immunomarker reference ranges |
title_full |
Application in a biomonitoring context of three-spined stickleback immunomarker reference ranges |
title_fullStr |
Application in a biomonitoring context of three-spined stickleback immunomarker reference ranges |
title_full_unstemmed |
Application in a biomonitoring context of three-spined stickleback immunomarker reference ranges |
title_sort |
application in a biomonitoring context of three-spined stickleback immunomarker reference ranges |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety |
issn |
0147-6513 |
publishDate |
2021-10-01 |
description |
The relevance of a biomarker for biomonitoring programs was influenced both by the knowledge on biomarker natural inter-individual and site variabilities and by the sensitivity of the biomarker towards environmental perturbations. To minimize data misinterpretation, robustness reference values for biomarkers were important in biomonitoring programs. Specific three-spined stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus, immune reference ranges for field studies had been determined based on laboratory data and one reference station (Contentieuse river at Houdancourt). In this study, data obtained in one uncontaminated and three contaminated sites were compared to these reference ranges as a validation step before considering them for larger scale biomonitoring programs. When the field reference range were compared to data from the uncontaminated station (Béronelle), only few deviations were shown. In this way, data coming from uncontaminated station (Béronelle) was integrated in the field reference ranges to improve the evaluation of site variability. The new field reference ranges provided better discrimination of sites and spanned a larger range of fish lengths than the initial reference ranges. Furthermore, the results suggest lysosomal presence during several months and phagocytosis capacity in autumn may be the most relevant immunomarkers towards identifying contaminated sites. In the future, combining this reference value approach with active biomonitoring could facilitate the obtention of data in multiple stream conditions. |
topic |
field reference values Biomonitoring Fish Innate immunity Confounding factors |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147651321006928 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT adrienmarchand applicationinabiomonitoringcontextofthreespinedsticklebackimmunomarkerreferenceranges AT cleotebby applicationinabiomonitoringcontextofthreespinedsticklebackimmunomarkerreferenceranges AT audreycatteau applicationinabiomonitoringcontextofthreespinedsticklebackimmunomarkerreferenceranges AT cyrilturies applicationinabiomonitoringcontextofthreespinedsticklebackimmunomarkerreferenceranges AT jeanmarcporcher applicationinabiomonitoringcontextofthreespinedsticklebackimmunomarkerreferenceranges AT annebadonilles applicationinabiomonitoringcontextofthreespinedsticklebackimmunomarkerreferenceranges |
_version_ |
1721203729890279424 |