An analysis of characteristics of post-authorisation studies registered on the ENCePP EU PAS Register [version 2; referees: 2 approved]

Background: The objective of this study was to investigate the study design characteristics of Post-Authorisation Studies (PAS) requested by the European Medicines Agency which were recorded on the European Union (EU) PAS Register held by the European Network of Centres for Pharmacoepidemiology and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Robert Carroll, Sreeram V. Ramagopalan, Javier Cid-Ruzafa, Dimitra Lambrelli, Laura McDonald
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: F1000 Research Ltd 2017-11-01
Series:F1000Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://f1000research.com/articles/6-1447/v2
id doaj-0dace09baf2c4034a072d09bf83705fe
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0dace09baf2c4034a072d09bf83705fe2020-11-25T02:48:21ZengF1000 Research LtdF1000Research2046-14022017-11-01610.12688/f1000research.12198.214284An analysis of characteristics of post-authorisation studies registered on the ENCePP EU PAS Register [version 2; referees: 2 approved]Robert Carroll0Sreeram V. Ramagopalan1Javier Cid-Ruzafa2Dimitra Lambrelli3Laura McDonald4Real-World Evidence, Evidera, London, W6 8DL, UKCentre for Observational Research and Data Sciences, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Uxbridge, UB8 1DH, UKReal-World Evidence, Evidera, London, W6 8DL, UKReal-World Evidence, Evidera, London, W6 8DL, UKCentre for Observational Research and Data Sciences, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Uxbridge, UB8 1DH, UKBackground: The objective of this study was to investigate the study design characteristics of Post-Authorisation Studies (PAS) requested by the European Medicines Agency which were recorded on the European Union (EU) PAS Register held by the European Network of Centres for Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance (ENCePP). Methods: We undertook a cross-sectional descriptive analysis of all studies registered on the EU PAS Register as of 18th October 2016. Results: We identified a total of 314 studies on the EU PAS Register, including 81 (26%) finalised, 160 (51%) ongoing and 73 (23%) planned. Of those studies identified, 205 (65%) included risk assessment in their scope, 133 (42%) included drug utilisation and 94 (30%) included effectiveness evaluation. Just over half of the studies (175; 56%) used primary data capture, 135 (43%) used secondary data and 4 (1%) used a hybrid design combining both approaches. Risk assessment and effectiveness studies were more likely to use primary data capture (60% and 85% respectively as compared to 39% and 14% respectively for secondary). The converse was true for drug utilisation studies where 59% were secondary vs. 39% for primary. For type 2 diabetes mellitus, database studies were more commonly used (80% vs 3% chart review, 3% hybrid and 13% primary data capture study designs) whereas for studies in oncology, primary data capture were more likely to be used (85% vs 4% chart review, and 11% database study designs). Conclusions: Results of this analysis show that PAS design varies according to study objectives and therapeutic area.https://f1000research.com/articles/6-1447/v2Global HealthStatistical Methodologies & Health Informatics
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Robert Carroll
Sreeram V. Ramagopalan
Javier Cid-Ruzafa
Dimitra Lambrelli
Laura McDonald
spellingShingle Robert Carroll
Sreeram V. Ramagopalan
Javier Cid-Ruzafa
Dimitra Lambrelli
Laura McDonald
An analysis of characteristics of post-authorisation studies registered on the ENCePP EU PAS Register [version 2; referees: 2 approved]
F1000Research
Global Health
Statistical Methodologies & Health Informatics
author_facet Robert Carroll
Sreeram V. Ramagopalan
Javier Cid-Ruzafa
Dimitra Lambrelli
Laura McDonald
author_sort Robert Carroll
title An analysis of characteristics of post-authorisation studies registered on the ENCePP EU PAS Register [version 2; referees: 2 approved]
title_short An analysis of characteristics of post-authorisation studies registered on the ENCePP EU PAS Register [version 2; referees: 2 approved]
title_full An analysis of characteristics of post-authorisation studies registered on the ENCePP EU PAS Register [version 2; referees: 2 approved]
title_fullStr An analysis of characteristics of post-authorisation studies registered on the ENCePP EU PAS Register [version 2; referees: 2 approved]
title_full_unstemmed An analysis of characteristics of post-authorisation studies registered on the ENCePP EU PAS Register [version 2; referees: 2 approved]
title_sort analysis of characteristics of post-authorisation studies registered on the encepp eu pas register [version 2; referees: 2 approved]
publisher F1000 Research Ltd
series F1000Research
issn 2046-1402
publishDate 2017-11-01
description Background: The objective of this study was to investigate the study design characteristics of Post-Authorisation Studies (PAS) requested by the European Medicines Agency which were recorded on the European Union (EU) PAS Register held by the European Network of Centres for Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance (ENCePP). Methods: We undertook a cross-sectional descriptive analysis of all studies registered on the EU PAS Register as of 18th October 2016. Results: We identified a total of 314 studies on the EU PAS Register, including 81 (26%) finalised, 160 (51%) ongoing and 73 (23%) planned. Of those studies identified, 205 (65%) included risk assessment in their scope, 133 (42%) included drug utilisation and 94 (30%) included effectiveness evaluation. Just over half of the studies (175; 56%) used primary data capture, 135 (43%) used secondary data and 4 (1%) used a hybrid design combining both approaches. Risk assessment and effectiveness studies were more likely to use primary data capture (60% and 85% respectively as compared to 39% and 14% respectively for secondary). The converse was true for drug utilisation studies where 59% were secondary vs. 39% for primary. For type 2 diabetes mellitus, database studies were more commonly used (80% vs 3% chart review, 3% hybrid and 13% primary data capture study designs) whereas for studies in oncology, primary data capture were more likely to be used (85% vs 4% chart review, and 11% database study designs). Conclusions: Results of this analysis show that PAS design varies according to study objectives and therapeutic area.
topic Global Health
Statistical Methodologies & Health Informatics
url https://f1000research.com/articles/6-1447/v2
work_keys_str_mv AT robertcarroll ananalysisofcharacteristicsofpostauthorisationstudiesregisteredontheenceppeupasregisterversion2referees2approved
AT sreeramvramagopalan ananalysisofcharacteristicsofpostauthorisationstudiesregisteredontheenceppeupasregisterversion2referees2approved
AT javiercidruzafa ananalysisofcharacteristicsofpostauthorisationstudiesregisteredontheenceppeupasregisterversion2referees2approved
AT dimitralambrelli ananalysisofcharacteristicsofpostauthorisationstudiesregisteredontheenceppeupasregisterversion2referees2approved
AT lauramcdonald ananalysisofcharacteristicsofpostauthorisationstudiesregisteredontheenceppeupasregisterversion2referees2approved
AT robertcarroll analysisofcharacteristicsofpostauthorisationstudiesregisteredontheenceppeupasregisterversion2referees2approved
AT sreeramvramagopalan analysisofcharacteristicsofpostauthorisationstudiesregisteredontheenceppeupasregisterversion2referees2approved
AT javiercidruzafa analysisofcharacteristicsofpostauthorisationstudiesregisteredontheenceppeupasregisterversion2referees2approved
AT dimitralambrelli analysisofcharacteristicsofpostauthorisationstudiesregisteredontheenceppeupasregisterversion2referees2approved
AT lauramcdonald analysisofcharacteristicsofpostauthorisationstudiesregisteredontheenceppeupasregisterversion2referees2approved
_version_ 1724748429269139456