Tax Policy Assessment in Slovenia – Case of Interest Tax Shield

The tax policy assessment is an indispensable strategy within any modern country’s system of governance. There are several types of “impact assessments”, with RIA as one of the most commonly used. This tool is used to measure and analyse the benefits, costs and effects of a new or existing legal reg...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jovanovic Tatjana, Klun Maja
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2017-03-01
Series:Danube
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/danb-2017-0001
id doaj-0da49326221547e09d58112f1ee5a641
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0da49326221547e09d58112f1ee5a6412021-09-05T20:42:41ZengSciendoDanube1804-82852017-03-018111710.1515/danb-2017-0001danb-2017-0001Tax Policy Assessment in Slovenia – Case of Interest Tax ShieldJovanovic Tatjana0Klun Maja1University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Administration, Gosarjeva ulica 5, SI-1000 Ljubljana, SloveniaUniversity of Ljubljana, Faculty of Administration, Gosarjeva ulica 5, SI-1000 Ljubljana, SloveniaThe tax policy assessment is an indispensable strategy within any modern country’s system of governance. There are several types of “impact assessments”, with RIA as one of the most commonly used. This tool is used to measure and analyse the benefits, costs and effects of a new or existing legal regime, which can be carried out by collecting and analysing empirical data in the context of a broader decision-making framework. The main objective of the paper is to analyse which stage the Slovenian regulatory impact assessment is in, and whether this stage is sophisticated enough to provide for the essential verification of tax policy and specific instruments, focusing mainly on the case of interest tax shield issues. Methodologically, the paper is based on a systematic literature review, a survey for public consultations and statistical tools for calculating the differences in internal indebtedness in different observed periods. The results show that the Slovenian RIA is not sophisticated enough to evaluate complex tax instruments and policy. Nevertheless, tax policy decision-makers should reconsider the implementation of a thin capitalization rule (but also future tax policy instruments) focusing also on other, non-tax revenue, factors.https://doi.org/10.1515/danb-2017-0001regulatory impact assessmenttax policythin capitalisationmultinational companies
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jovanovic Tatjana
Klun Maja
spellingShingle Jovanovic Tatjana
Klun Maja
Tax Policy Assessment in Slovenia – Case of Interest Tax Shield
Danube
regulatory impact assessment
tax policy
thin capitalisation
multinational companies
author_facet Jovanovic Tatjana
Klun Maja
author_sort Jovanovic Tatjana
title Tax Policy Assessment in Slovenia – Case of Interest Tax Shield
title_short Tax Policy Assessment in Slovenia – Case of Interest Tax Shield
title_full Tax Policy Assessment in Slovenia – Case of Interest Tax Shield
title_fullStr Tax Policy Assessment in Slovenia – Case of Interest Tax Shield
title_full_unstemmed Tax Policy Assessment in Slovenia – Case of Interest Tax Shield
title_sort tax policy assessment in slovenia – case of interest tax shield
publisher Sciendo
series Danube
issn 1804-8285
publishDate 2017-03-01
description The tax policy assessment is an indispensable strategy within any modern country’s system of governance. There are several types of “impact assessments”, with RIA as one of the most commonly used. This tool is used to measure and analyse the benefits, costs and effects of a new or existing legal regime, which can be carried out by collecting and analysing empirical data in the context of a broader decision-making framework. The main objective of the paper is to analyse which stage the Slovenian regulatory impact assessment is in, and whether this stage is sophisticated enough to provide for the essential verification of tax policy and specific instruments, focusing mainly on the case of interest tax shield issues. Methodologically, the paper is based on a systematic literature review, a survey for public consultations and statistical tools for calculating the differences in internal indebtedness in different observed periods. The results show that the Slovenian RIA is not sophisticated enough to evaluate complex tax instruments and policy. Nevertheless, tax policy decision-makers should reconsider the implementation of a thin capitalization rule (but also future tax policy instruments) focusing also on other, non-tax revenue, factors.
topic regulatory impact assessment
tax policy
thin capitalisation
multinational companies
url https://doi.org/10.1515/danb-2017-0001
work_keys_str_mv AT jovanovictatjana taxpolicyassessmentinsloveniacaseofinteresttaxshield
AT klunmaja taxpolicyassessmentinsloveniacaseofinteresttaxshield
_version_ 1717785265010900992