Taking in Account Parcial Judges for the Composition of Disciplinary Quorums: Critical Analysis of the Rulings of the Brazilian Supreme Court and of the National Council of Justice
The article 93, VIII and X, of the Brazilian Constitution provides that more than half of a court must be in agreement when judging its peers. The Brazilian Supreme Court and the National Council of Justice have rulings in the sense that even the members of the court who declare themselves parcial –...
Main Author: | Inês Ferreira Dias Tavares |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Portuguese |
Published: |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
2016-10-01
|
Series: | Revista de Política Judiciária, Gestão e Administração da Justiça |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistapoliticiajudiciaria/article/view/519 |
Similar Items
-
IMPARCIALIDADE JUDICIAL À BRASILEIRA? / BRAZILIAN JUDICIAL IMPARTIALITY?
by: ALEXANDRE DOUGLAS ZAIDAN DE CARVALHO
Published: (2018-02-01) -
PRINCIPLE OF JUDGE IMPARTIALITY: CONFLICT WITH HUMAN MENTAL PROCESSES
by: Ana Flavia de Andrade Nogueira Castilho, et al.
Published: (2018-08-01) -
Control of Foreign Courts: Limits and Possibilities of the National Council of Justice
by: Edith Maria Barbosa Ramos, et al.
Published: (2015-12-01) -
Independencia del Poder Judicial. Punto final al peligroso mecanismo de designación de jueces subrogantes
by: Gonzalo Fuentes
Published: (2017-10-01) -
The role of the judge and hermeneut partially positive
by: Marcos Antônio Striquer Soares, et al.
Published: (2015-09-01)