Meat bone meal as fertiliser for barley and oat

The traditional production of mineral N and P fertilisers is unsustainable due its reliance on fossil fuels in the case of N, and on limited mineral resource stocks in the case of P. The use of alternative or complementary fertilisers that originate from organic waste materials is gaining interest....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: L. CHEN, J. KIVELÄ, J. HELENIUS
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Scientific Agricultural Society of Finland 2008-12-01
Series:Agricultural and Food Science
Online Access:https://journal.fi/afs/article/view/6018
id doaj-0d9b7ced8c3c41bd871086646d4c86b4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0d9b7ced8c3c41bd871086646d4c86b42020-11-24T23:59:46ZengScientific Agricultural Society of FinlandAgricultural and Food Science1459-60671795-18952008-12-01203 Meat bone meal as fertiliser for barley and oatL. CHENJ. KIVELÄJ. HELENIUSThe traditional production of mineral N and P fertilisers is unsustainable due its reliance on fossil fuels in the case of N, and on limited mineral resource stocks in the case of P. The use of alternative or complementary fertilisers that originate from organic waste materials is gaining interest. Organic farms, especially arable organic farms without livestock, need usable sources of plant nutrients. Meat bone meal (MBM), a potential organic fertiliser for agricultural crops, contains considerable amounts of nutrients (on average 8% N, 5% P, 1% K and 10% Ca). In EU countries, Commission regulation (EC) No 181/2006 authorised the use of MBM as an organic fertiliser. In this study, MBM was compared to conventional mineral NPK fertiliser. Two randomised complete block split-plot field experiments were conducted: one with spring barley (Hordeum vulgare) in two years; and another with oat (Avena sativa) for three years, including a fourth year of testing for residual effect. Compared to mineral fertiliser (20% N, 3% P and 9% K), MBM was applied at three N levels: 60, 90 and 120 kg N ha-1. The grain yield of both cereal species supported by MBM, did not differ from the yield obtained with the mineral fertiliser at any N level. At 120 kg N ha-1, the grain yield level with either type was ca. 4500 kg ha-1 of barley and 5000 kg ha-1 of oat, representing fair averages for Finnish conditions. Moreover, MBM and mineral fertilisation showed no differences in quality in terms of 1000-grain weight, test-weight, protein content and protein yield. Since MBM has a low N/P ratio, P was applied in surplus to attain comparable N levels. Therefore MBM fertilisation should be fitted for crop rotation and for meeting environmental requirements.;https://journal.fi/afs/article/view/6018
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author L. CHEN
J. KIVELÄ
J. HELENIUS
spellingShingle L. CHEN
J. KIVELÄ
J. HELENIUS
Meat bone meal as fertiliser for barley and oat
Agricultural and Food Science
author_facet L. CHEN
J. KIVELÄ
J. HELENIUS
author_sort L. CHEN
title Meat bone meal as fertiliser for barley and oat
title_short Meat bone meal as fertiliser for barley and oat
title_full Meat bone meal as fertiliser for barley and oat
title_fullStr Meat bone meal as fertiliser for barley and oat
title_full_unstemmed Meat bone meal as fertiliser for barley and oat
title_sort meat bone meal as fertiliser for barley and oat
publisher Scientific Agricultural Society of Finland
series Agricultural and Food Science
issn 1459-6067
1795-1895
publishDate 2008-12-01
description The traditional production of mineral N and P fertilisers is unsustainable due its reliance on fossil fuels in the case of N, and on limited mineral resource stocks in the case of P. The use of alternative or complementary fertilisers that originate from organic waste materials is gaining interest. Organic farms, especially arable organic farms without livestock, need usable sources of plant nutrients. Meat bone meal (MBM), a potential organic fertiliser for agricultural crops, contains considerable amounts of nutrients (on average 8% N, 5% P, 1% K and 10% Ca). In EU countries, Commission regulation (EC) No 181/2006 authorised the use of MBM as an organic fertiliser. In this study, MBM was compared to conventional mineral NPK fertiliser. Two randomised complete block split-plot field experiments were conducted: one with spring barley (Hordeum vulgare) in two years; and another with oat (Avena sativa) for three years, including a fourth year of testing for residual effect. Compared to mineral fertiliser (20% N, 3% P and 9% K), MBM was applied at three N levels: 60, 90 and 120 kg N ha-1. The grain yield of both cereal species supported by MBM, did not differ from the yield obtained with the mineral fertiliser at any N level. At 120 kg N ha-1, the grain yield level with either type was ca. 4500 kg ha-1 of barley and 5000 kg ha-1 of oat, representing fair averages for Finnish conditions. Moreover, MBM and mineral fertilisation showed no differences in quality in terms of 1000-grain weight, test-weight, protein content and protein yield. Since MBM has a low N/P ratio, P was applied in surplus to attain comparable N levels. Therefore MBM fertilisation should be fitted for crop rotation and for meeting environmental requirements.;
url https://journal.fi/afs/article/view/6018
work_keys_str_mv AT lchen meatbonemealasfertiliserforbarleyandoat
AT jkivela meatbonemealasfertiliserforbarleyandoat
AT jhelenius meatbonemealasfertiliserforbarleyandoat
_version_ 1725446152367636480