Establishing a Field of Collaboration for Engineers, Scientists, and Community Groups: Incentives, Barriers, and Potential

Abstract With the aim of mobilizing engineers and scientists to address environmental, climate, and energy justice challenges in the United States, this study examines how engineers and scientists view their incentives, barriers, and potential for community‐based collaborations. Through a purposive...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J. L. Boucher, A. M. Levenda, J. Morales‐Guerrero, M. M. Macias, D. M. A. Karwat
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Geophysical Union (AGU) 2020-10-01
Series:Earth's Future
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001624
id doaj-0d98522672e848ba84ed686e5f05e41b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0d98522672e848ba84ed686e5f05e41b2021-06-09T21:33:47ZengAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU)Earth's Future2328-42772020-10-01810n/an/a10.1029/2020EF001624Establishing a Field of Collaboration for Engineers, Scientists, and Community Groups: Incentives, Barriers, and PotentialJ. L. Boucher0A. M. Levenda1J. Morales‐Guerrero2M. M. Macias3D. M. A. Karwat4School for the Future of Innovation in Society Arizona State University Tempe AZ USADepartment of Geography and Environmental Sustainability University of Oklahoma Norman OK USASchool of Sustainability Arizona State University Tempe AZ USAIra A. Fulton Schools of Engineering Arizona State University Tempe AZ USASchool for the Future of Innovation in Society Arizona State University Tempe AZ USAAbstract With the aim of mobilizing engineers and scientists to address environmental, climate, and energy justice challenges in the United States, this study examines how engineers and scientists view their incentives, barriers, and potential for community‐based collaborations. Through a purposive convenience sample (n = 281) and an online questionnaire, we investigate the attitudes and experiences of engineers and scientists regarding their community‐based work. Our analyses reveal dynamics of race, class, and experience, suggesting a type of socio‐demographic conditioning informing community‐based collaborations. Engineers and scientists also identify four main barriers to community‐based work: lack of time, lack of funding, lack of rapport, and knowledge deficits. In response, we introduce a field of collaboration with its own set of capitals—economic, cultural, social, and symbolic—and offer recommendations on how engineers, scientists, and community groups might collaborate with each other to address longstanding issues of energy, climate, and environmental injustice in the United States.https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001624community‐based engineering and scienceenvironmental, climate, and energy justicefield of collaboration
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author J. L. Boucher
A. M. Levenda
J. Morales‐Guerrero
M. M. Macias
D. M. A. Karwat
spellingShingle J. L. Boucher
A. M. Levenda
J. Morales‐Guerrero
M. M. Macias
D. M. A. Karwat
Establishing a Field of Collaboration for Engineers, Scientists, and Community Groups: Incentives, Barriers, and Potential
Earth's Future
community‐based engineering and science
environmental, climate, and energy justice
field of collaboration
author_facet J. L. Boucher
A. M. Levenda
J. Morales‐Guerrero
M. M. Macias
D. M. A. Karwat
author_sort J. L. Boucher
title Establishing a Field of Collaboration for Engineers, Scientists, and Community Groups: Incentives, Barriers, and Potential
title_short Establishing a Field of Collaboration for Engineers, Scientists, and Community Groups: Incentives, Barriers, and Potential
title_full Establishing a Field of Collaboration for Engineers, Scientists, and Community Groups: Incentives, Barriers, and Potential
title_fullStr Establishing a Field of Collaboration for Engineers, Scientists, and Community Groups: Incentives, Barriers, and Potential
title_full_unstemmed Establishing a Field of Collaboration for Engineers, Scientists, and Community Groups: Incentives, Barriers, and Potential
title_sort establishing a field of collaboration for engineers, scientists, and community groups: incentives, barriers, and potential
publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU)
series Earth's Future
issn 2328-4277
publishDate 2020-10-01
description Abstract With the aim of mobilizing engineers and scientists to address environmental, climate, and energy justice challenges in the United States, this study examines how engineers and scientists view their incentives, barriers, and potential for community‐based collaborations. Through a purposive convenience sample (n = 281) and an online questionnaire, we investigate the attitudes and experiences of engineers and scientists regarding their community‐based work. Our analyses reveal dynamics of race, class, and experience, suggesting a type of socio‐demographic conditioning informing community‐based collaborations. Engineers and scientists also identify four main barriers to community‐based work: lack of time, lack of funding, lack of rapport, and knowledge deficits. In response, we introduce a field of collaboration with its own set of capitals—economic, cultural, social, and symbolic—and offer recommendations on how engineers, scientists, and community groups might collaborate with each other to address longstanding issues of energy, climate, and environmental injustice in the United States.
topic community‐based engineering and science
environmental, climate, and energy justice
field of collaboration
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001624
work_keys_str_mv AT jlboucher establishingafieldofcollaborationforengineersscientistsandcommunitygroupsincentivesbarriersandpotential
AT amlevenda establishingafieldofcollaborationforengineersscientistsandcommunitygroupsincentivesbarriersandpotential
AT jmoralesguerrero establishingafieldofcollaborationforengineersscientistsandcommunitygroupsincentivesbarriersandpotential
AT mmmacias establishingafieldofcollaborationforengineersscientistsandcommunitygroupsincentivesbarriersandpotential
AT dmakarwat establishingafieldofcollaborationforengineersscientistsandcommunitygroupsincentivesbarriersandpotential
_version_ 1721386472321318912