Autonomy and Emotion Management. Middle managers in welfare professions during radical organizational change

This case study was conducted among middle managers during a period of radical change within the Norwegian child welfare service. Our goal was to explore how the middle managers handle and respond to emotional dissonance and constraints in autonomy during the change process. We collected data throug...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hulda Mjöll Gunnarsdóttir
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Aalborg University 2016-03-01
Series:Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://tidsskrift.dk/njwls/article/view/26654
id doaj-0d580ab8c01e4b1196cc9119233f53be
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0d580ab8c01e4b1196cc9119233f53be2020-11-24T21:26:23ZengAalborg UniversityNordic Journal of Working Life Studies2245-01572016-03-016S110.19154/njwls.v6i1.488724050Autonomy and Emotion Management. Middle managers in welfare professions during radical organizational changeHulda Mjöll Gunnarsdóttir0Institute of Media, Culture, and Social Sciences Faculty of Social Sciences, University of StavangerThis case study was conducted among middle managers during a period of radical change within the Norwegian child welfare service. Our goal was to explore how the middle managers handle and respond to emotional dissonance and constraints in autonomy during the change process. We collected data through group meetings, individual interviews, and focus groups. Prior research on middle managers has shown their importance in the implementation of organizational change. We propose that middle managers conduct emotion work, emotional labor, and emotional balancing in response to the increased complexity of organizational expectations during change processes. Further, we argue that the need for relevant emotion management reflects a threat to managers’ autonomy. Our findings indicate that middle managers feel emotional dissonance, due to their position as both recipients and executers of organizational change. This makes them vulnerable to questions of loyalty, and they feel they have no backstage where they can express themselves openly. However, their ability to plan emotion management and to balance various conflicting expectations enables them to maintain autonomy during a radical change process. Our basic arguments and findings are summarized by applying the logic of a historistic functional model.https://tidsskrift.dk/njwls/article/view/26654Organization & management
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hulda Mjöll Gunnarsdóttir
spellingShingle Hulda Mjöll Gunnarsdóttir
Autonomy and Emotion Management. Middle managers in welfare professions during radical organizational change
Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies
Organization & management
author_facet Hulda Mjöll Gunnarsdóttir
author_sort Hulda Mjöll Gunnarsdóttir
title Autonomy and Emotion Management. Middle managers in welfare professions during radical organizational change
title_short Autonomy and Emotion Management. Middle managers in welfare professions during radical organizational change
title_full Autonomy and Emotion Management. Middle managers in welfare professions during radical organizational change
title_fullStr Autonomy and Emotion Management. Middle managers in welfare professions during radical organizational change
title_full_unstemmed Autonomy and Emotion Management. Middle managers in welfare professions during radical organizational change
title_sort autonomy and emotion management. middle managers in welfare professions during radical organizational change
publisher Aalborg University
series Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies
issn 2245-0157
publishDate 2016-03-01
description This case study was conducted among middle managers during a period of radical change within the Norwegian child welfare service. Our goal was to explore how the middle managers handle and respond to emotional dissonance and constraints in autonomy during the change process. We collected data through group meetings, individual interviews, and focus groups. Prior research on middle managers has shown their importance in the implementation of organizational change. We propose that middle managers conduct emotion work, emotional labor, and emotional balancing in response to the increased complexity of organizational expectations during change processes. Further, we argue that the need for relevant emotion management reflects a threat to managers’ autonomy. Our findings indicate that middle managers feel emotional dissonance, due to their position as both recipients and executers of organizational change. This makes them vulnerable to questions of loyalty, and they feel they have no backstage where they can express themselves openly. However, their ability to plan emotion management and to balance various conflicting expectations enables them to maintain autonomy during a radical change process. Our basic arguments and findings are summarized by applying the logic of a historistic functional model.
topic Organization & management
url https://tidsskrift.dk/njwls/article/view/26654
work_keys_str_mv AT huldamjollgunnarsdottir autonomyandemotionmanagementmiddlemanagersinwelfareprofessionsduringradicalorganizationalchange
_version_ 1725980155039449088