Feasibility of LifeFul, a relationship and reablement-focused culture change program in residential aged care

Abstract Background The protective, custodial, task-oriented care provided in residential aged care facilitates decreases health and wellbeing of residents. The aim of the study was to conduct a feasibility study of LifeFul – a 12 month reablement program in residential aged care. Methods LifeFul wa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lee-Fay Low, Shruti Venkatesh, Lindy Clemson, Dafna Merom, Anne-Nicole Casey, Henry Brodaty
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-05-01
Series:BMC Geriatrics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12877-018-0822-3
id doaj-0d4e2a4a66394f6da11407c80136d6c5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0d4e2a4a66394f6da11407c80136d6c52020-11-25T03:52:08ZengBMCBMC Geriatrics1471-23182018-05-0118111210.1186/s12877-018-0822-3Feasibility of LifeFul, a relationship and reablement-focused culture change program in residential aged careLee-Fay Low0Shruti Venkatesh1Lindy Clemson2Dafna Merom3Anne-Nicole Casey4Henry Brodaty5The University of SydneyThe University of SydneyThe University of SydneyWestern Sydney UniversityCentre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBa), the University of New South WalesCentre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBa), the University of New South WalesAbstract Background The protective, custodial, task-oriented care provided in residential aged care facilitates decreases health and wellbeing of residents. The aim of the study was to conduct a feasibility study of LifeFul – a 12 month reablement program in residential aged care. Methods LifeFul was developed based on systematic reviews of reablement and staff behaviour change in residential aged care, and in consultation with aged care providers, consumers and clinicians. LifeFul includes: engaging and supporting facility leaders to facilitate organisational change, procedural changes including dedicated rostering, assigning each resident a ‘focus’ carer and focusing on the psychosocial care of residents part of handovers and staff training. The study was conducted in three Australian residential aged care facilities. A pre-post mixed methods design was used to evaluate recruitment and retention, fidelity and adherence, acceptability, enablers and barriers and suitability of outcome measures for the program. Results Eighty of 146 residents agreed to participate at baseline and 69 of these were followed up at 12 months. One hundred and four of 157 staff participated at baseline and 85 of 123 who were still working at the facilities participated at 12 months. Staff perceived the program to be acceptable, barriers included having insufficient time, having insufficient staff, negative attitudes, misunderstanding new procedures, and lack of sufficient leadership support. Quantitative data were promising in regards to residents’ depression symptoms, functioning and social care related quality of life. Conclusion It is feasible to deliver and evaluate LifeFul. The program could be improved through increased leadership training and support, and by focusing efforts on residents having a ‘best week’ rather than on completing a document each handover. Trial registration Registered prospectively on 22nd January 2016 on ANZCTR369802.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12877-018-0822-3Nursing homeResidential aged careLong-term careReablementRestorative careRelationship-focused care
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lee-Fay Low
Shruti Venkatesh
Lindy Clemson
Dafna Merom
Anne-Nicole Casey
Henry Brodaty
spellingShingle Lee-Fay Low
Shruti Venkatesh
Lindy Clemson
Dafna Merom
Anne-Nicole Casey
Henry Brodaty
Feasibility of LifeFul, a relationship and reablement-focused culture change program in residential aged care
BMC Geriatrics
Nursing home
Residential aged care
Long-term care
Reablement
Restorative care
Relationship-focused care
author_facet Lee-Fay Low
Shruti Venkatesh
Lindy Clemson
Dafna Merom
Anne-Nicole Casey
Henry Brodaty
author_sort Lee-Fay Low
title Feasibility of LifeFul, a relationship and reablement-focused culture change program in residential aged care
title_short Feasibility of LifeFul, a relationship and reablement-focused culture change program in residential aged care
title_full Feasibility of LifeFul, a relationship and reablement-focused culture change program in residential aged care
title_fullStr Feasibility of LifeFul, a relationship and reablement-focused culture change program in residential aged care
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility of LifeFul, a relationship and reablement-focused culture change program in residential aged care
title_sort feasibility of lifeful, a relationship and reablement-focused culture change program in residential aged care
publisher BMC
series BMC Geriatrics
issn 1471-2318
publishDate 2018-05-01
description Abstract Background The protective, custodial, task-oriented care provided in residential aged care facilitates decreases health and wellbeing of residents. The aim of the study was to conduct a feasibility study of LifeFul – a 12 month reablement program in residential aged care. Methods LifeFul was developed based on systematic reviews of reablement and staff behaviour change in residential aged care, and in consultation with aged care providers, consumers and clinicians. LifeFul includes: engaging and supporting facility leaders to facilitate organisational change, procedural changes including dedicated rostering, assigning each resident a ‘focus’ carer and focusing on the psychosocial care of residents part of handovers and staff training. The study was conducted in three Australian residential aged care facilities. A pre-post mixed methods design was used to evaluate recruitment and retention, fidelity and adherence, acceptability, enablers and barriers and suitability of outcome measures for the program. Results Eighty of 146 residents agreed to participate at baseline and 69 of these were followed up at 12 months. One hundred and four of 157 staff participated at baseline and 85 of 123 who were still working at the facilities participated at 12 months. Staff perceived the program to be acceptable, barriers included having insufficient time, having insufficient staff, negative attitudes, misunderstanding new procedures, and lack of sufficient leadership support. Quantitative data were promising in regards to residents’ depression symptoms, functioning and social care related quality of life. Conclusion It is feasible to deliver and evaluate LifeFul. The program could be improved through increased leadership training and support, and by focusing efforts on residents having a ‘best week’ rather than on completing a document each handover. Trial registration Registered prospectively on 22nd January 2016 on ANZCTR369802.
topic Nursing home
Residential aged care
Long-term care
Reablement
Restorative care
Relationship-focused care
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12877-018-0822-3
work_keys_str_mv AT leefaylow feasibilityoflifefularelationshipandreablementfocusedculturechangeprograminresidentialagedcare
AT shrutivenkatesh feasibilityoflifefularelationshipandreablementfocusedculturechangeprograminresidentialagedcare
AT lindyclemson feasibilityoflifefularelationshipandreablementfocusedculturechangeprograminresidentialagedcare
AT dafnamerom feasibilityoflifefularelationshipandreablementfocusedculturechangeprograminresidentialagedcare
AT annenicolecasey feasibilityoflifefularelationshipandreablementfocusedculturechangeprograminresidentialagedcare
AT henrybrodaty feasibilityoflifefularelationshipandreablementfocusedculturechangeprograminresidentialagedcare
_version_ 1724484149047197696