Feasibility of LifeFul, a relationship and reablement-focused culture change program in residential aged care
Abstract Background The protective, custodial, task-oriented care provided in residential aged care facilitates decreases health and wellbeing of residents. The aim of the study was to conduct a feasibility study of LifeFul – a 12 month reablement program in residential aged care. Methods LifeFul wa...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2018-05-01
|
Series: | BMC Geriatrics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12877-018-0822-3 |
id |
doaj-0d4e2a4a66394f6da11407c80136d6c5 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0d4e2a4a66394f6da11407c80136d6c52020-11-25T03:52:08ZengBMCBMC Geriatrics1471-23182018-05-0118111210.1186/s12877-018-0822-3Feasibility of LifeFul, a relationship and reablement-focused culture change program in residential aged careLee-Fay Low0Shruti Venkatesh1Lindy Clemson2Dafna Merom3Anne-Nicole Casey4Henry Brodaty5The University of SydneyThe University of SydneyThe University of SydneyWestern Sydney UniversityCentre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBa), the University of New South WalesCentre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBa), the University of New South WalesAbstract Background The protective, custodial, task-oriented care provided in residential aged care facilitates decreases health and wellbeing of residents. The aim of the study was to conduct a feasibility study of LifeFul – a 12 month reablement program in residential aged care. Methods LifeFul was developed based on systematic reviews of reablement and staff behaviour change in residential aged care, and in consultation with aged care providers, consumers and clinicians. LifeFul includes: engaging and supporting facility leaders to facilitate organisational change, procedural changes including dedicated rostering, assigning each resident a ‘focus’ carer and focusing on the psychosocial care of residents part of handovers and staff training. The study was conducted in three Australian residential aged care facilities. A pre-post mixed methods design was used to evaluate recruitment and retention, fidelity and adherence, acceptability, enablers and barriers and suitability of outcome measures for the program. Results Eighty of 146 residents agreed to participate at baseline and 69 of these were followed up at 12 months. One hundred and four of 157 staff participated at baseline and 85 of 123 who were still working at the facilities participated at 12 months. Staff perceived the program to be acceptable, barriers included having insufficient time, having insufficient staff, negative attitudes, misunderstanding new procedures, and lack of sufficient leadership support. Quantitative data were promising in regards to residents’ depression symptoms, functioning and social care related quality of life. Conclusion It is feasible to deliver and evaluate LifeFul. The program could be improved through increased leadership training and support, and by focusing efforts on residents having a ‘best week’ rather than on completing a document each handover. Trial registration Registered prospectively on 22nd January 2016 on ANZCTR369802.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12877-018-0822-3Nursing homeResidential aged careLong-term careReablementRestorative careRelationship-focused care |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Lee-Fay Low Shruti Venkatesh Lindy Clemson Dafna Merom Anne-Nicole Casey Henry Brodaty |
spellingShingle |
Lee-Fay Low Shruti Venkatesh Lindy Clemson Dafna Merom Anne-Nicole Casey Henry Brodaty Feasibility of LifeFul, a relationship and reablement-focused culture change program in residential aged care BMC Geriatrics Nursing home Residential aged care Long-term care Reablement Restorative care Relationship-focused care |
author_facet |
Lee-Fay Low Shruti Venkatesh Lindy Clemson Dafna Merom Anne-Nicole Casey Henry Brodaty |
author_sort |
Lee-Fay Low |
title |
Feasibility of LifeFul, a relationship and reablement-focused culture change program in residential aged care |
title_short |
Feasibility of LifeFul, a relationship and reablement-focused culture change program in residential aged care |
title_full |
Feasibility of LifeFul, a relationship and reablement-focused culture change program in residential aged care |
title_fullStr |
Feasibility of LifeFul, a relationship and reablement-focused culture change program in residential aged care |
title_full_unstemmed |
Feasibility of LifeFul, a relationship and reablement-focused culture change program in residential aged care |
title_sort |
feasibility of lifeful, a relationship and reablement-focused culture change program in residential aged care |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Geriatrics |
issn |
1471-2318 |
publishDate |
2018-05-01 |
description |
Abstract Background The protective, custodial, task-oriented care provided in residential aged care facilitates decreases health and wellbeing of residents. The aim of the study was to conduct a feasibility study of LifeFul – a 12 month reablement program in residential aged care. Methods LifeFul was developed based on systematic reviews of reablement and staff behaviour change in residential aged care, and in consultation with aged care providers, consumers and clinicians. LifeFul includes: engaging and supporting facility leaders to facilitate organisational change, procedural changes including dedicated rostering, assigning each resident a ‘focus’ carer and focusing on the psychosocial care of residents part of handovers and staff training. The study was conducted in three Australian residential aged care facilities. A pre-post mixed methods design was used to evaluate recruitment and retention, fidelity and adherence, acceptability, enablers and barriers and suitability of outcome measures for the program. Results Eighty of 146 residents agreed to participate at baseline and 69 of these were followed up at 12 months. One hundred and four of 157 staff participated at baseline and 85 of 123 who were still working at the facilities participated at 12 months. Staff perceived the program to be acceptable, barriers included having insufficient time, having insufficient staff, negative attitudes, misunderstanding new procedures, and lack of sufficient leadership support. Quantitative data were promising in regards to residents’ depression symptoms, functioning and social care related quality of life. Conclusion It is feasible to deliver and evaluate LifeFul. The program could be improved through increased leadership training and support, and by focusing efforts on residents having a ‘best week’ rather than on completing a document each handover. Trial registration Registered prospectively on 22nd January 2016 on ANZCTR369802. |
topic |
Nursing home Residential aged care Long-term care Reablement Restorative care Relationship-focused care |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12877-018-0822-3 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT leefaylow feasibilityoflifefularelationshipandreablementfocusedculturechangeprograminresidentialagedcare AT shrutivenkatesh feasibilityoflifefularelationshipandreablementfocusedculturechangeprograminresidentialagedcare AT lindyclemson feasibilityoflifefularelationshipandreablementfocusedculturechangeprograminresidentialagedcare AT dafnamerom feasibilityoflifefularelationshipandreablementfocusedculturechangeprograminresidentialagedcare AT annenicolecasey feasibilityoflifefularelationshipandreablementfocusedculturechangeprograminresidentialagedcare AT henrybrodaty feasibilityoflifefularelationshipandreablementfocusedculturechangeprograminresidentialagedcare |
_version_ |
1724484149047197696 |