Under false flag: using technical artifacts for cyber attack attribution
Abstract The attribution of cyber attacks is often neglected. The consensus still is that little can be done to prosecute the perpetrators – and unfortunately, this might be right in many cases. What is however only of limited interest for the private industry is in the center of interest for nation...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2020-03-01
|
Series: | Cybersecurity |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s42400-020-00048-4 |
id |
doaj-0d49d7c31d1443dd936d7e2d89120800 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0d49d7c31d1443dd936d7e2d891208002020-11-25T02:30:46ZengSpringerOpenCybersecurity2523-32462020-03-013112010.1186/s42400-020-00048-4Under false flag: using technical artifacts for cyber attack attributionFlorian Skopik0Timea Pahi1Center for Digital Safety and Security, AIT Austrian Institute of Technology, AustriaCenter for Digital Safety and Security, AIT Austrian Institute of Technology, AustriaAbstract The attribution of cyber attacks is often neglected. The consensus still is that little can be done to prosecute the perpetrators – and unfortunately, this might be right in many cases. What is however only of limited interest for the private industry is in the center of interest for nation states. Investigating if an attack was carried out in the name of a nation state is a crucial task for secret services. Many methods, tools and processes exist for network- and computer forensics that allow the collection of traces and evidences. They are the basis to associate adversarial actions to threat actors. However, a serious problem which has not got the appropriate attention from research yet, are false flag campaigns, cyber attacks which apply covert tactics to deceive or misguide attribution attempts – either to hide traces or to blame others. In this paper we provide an overview of prominent attack techniques along the cyber kill chain. We investigate traces left by attack techniques and which questions in course of the attribution process are answered by investigating these traces. Eventually, we assess how easily traces can be spoofed and rate their relevancy with respect to identifying false flag campaigns.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s42400-020-00048-4Actor attributionAdvanced persistent threatsTechnical indicatorsFalse flag campaigns |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Florian Skopik Timea Pahi |
spellingShingle |
Florian Skopik Timea Pahi Under false flag: using technical artifacts for cyber attack attribution Cybersecurity Actor attribution Advanced persistent threats Technical indicators False flag campaigns |
author_facet |
Florian Skopik Timea Pahi |
author_sort |
Florian Skopik |
title |
Under false flag: using technical artifacts for cyber attack attribution |
title_short |
Under false flag: using technical artifacts for cyber attack attribution |
title_full |
Under false flag: using technical artifacts for cyber attack attribution |
title_fullStr |
Under false flag: using technical artifacts for cyber attack attribution |
title_full_unstemmed |
Under false flag: using technical artifacts for cyber attack attribution |
title_sort |
under false flag: using technical artifacts for cyber attack attribution |
publisher |
SpringerOpen |
series |
Cybersecurity |
issn |
2523-3246 |
publishDate |
2020-03-01 |
description |
Abstract The attribution of cyber attacks is often neglected. The consensus still is that little can be done to prosecute the perpetrators – and unfortunately, this might be right in many cases. What is however only of limited interest for the private industry is in the center of interest for nation states. Investigating if an attack was carried out in the name of a nation state is a crucial task for secret services. Many methods, tools and processes exist for network- and computer forensics that allow the collection of traces and evidences. They are the basis to associate adversarial actions to threat actors. However, a serious problem which has not got the appropriate attention from research yet, are false flag campaigns, cyber attacks which apply covert tactics to deceive or misguide attribution attempts – either to hide traces or to blame others. In this paper we provide an overview of prominent attack techniques along the cyber kill chain. We investigate traces left by attack techniques and which questions in course of the attribution process are answered by investigating these traces. Eventually, we assess how easily traces can be spoofed and rate their relevancy with respect to identifying false flag campaigns. |
topic |
Actor attribution Advanced persistent threats Technical indicators False flag campaigns |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s42400-020-00048-4 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT florianskopik underfalseflagusingtechnicalartifactsforcyberattackattribution AT timeapahi underfalseflagusingtechnicalartifactsforcyberattackattribution |
_version_ |
1724827999772082176 |