This is Not a Nest

Although the architecture competition has been analysed through a number of rhetorical lenses, the recurring production of transcultural metaphors, particularly in international competitions, remains to be addressed as a genuine disciplinary phenomenon. The hypothesis of competitions as contact zon...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jean-Pierre Chupin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Jap Sam Books 2020-07-01
Series:Footprint
Online Access:https://ojs-libaccp.tudelft.nl/index.php/footprint/article/view/3835
id doaj-0d36aac9f57a47fdb10436a9452cb6bd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0d36aac9f57a47fdb10436a9452cb6bd2021-02-08T12:05:25ZengJap Sam BooksFootprint1875-15041875-14902020-07-0114110.7480/footprint.14.1.3835This is Not a NestJean-Pierre Chupin0Université de Montréal Although the architecture competition has been analysed through a number of rhetorical lenses, the recurring production of transcultural metaphors, particularly in international competitions, remains to be addressed as a genuine disciplinary phenomenon. The hypothesis of competitions as contact zones is particularly appropriate for the study of international events, in which competitors forge broad analogical figures to bridge cultural differences. Recent studies in the cognitive understanding of analogical matrices have considerably reinforced the theories on metaphors. Our analytical grid characterizes analogical matrices to identify levels of symbolic operations through the differentiation of formal, structural and conceptual analogies. We first dig into a sample of competition projects nicknames (Crystal, Birds’Nest, DNA, Cloud, Lace, Stealth, etc.) to confirm that these tropes have a paradoxical status at the intersection of architects’ intents and the public expectations. We then summarize an in-depth hermeneutical discourse analysis of 40 North American international competitions. This indicates a fourfold series of expectations to which competitors hope to provide answers in an international ‘conflict of interpretations’. Adhering to the theory of speech acts, we suggest that performative metaphors in competitions appear less as indicators of designers’ intentions than as products of the broader context surrounding competitions themselves. We conclude with a proposed grid indexing four types of contact zones in which metaphorical relationships are actively created and not just repeated. https://ojs-libaccp.tudelft.nl/index.php/footprint/article/view/3835
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jean-Pierre Chupin
spellingShingle Jean-Pierre Chupin
This is Not a Nest
Footprint
author_facet Jean-Pierre Chupin
author_sort Jean-Pierre Chupin
title This is Not a Nest
title_short This is Not a Nest
title_full This is Not a Nest
title_fullStr This is Not a Nest
title_full_unstemmed This is Not a Nest
title_sort this is not a nest
publisher Jap Sam Books
series Footprint
issn 1875-1504
1875-1490
publishDate 2020-07-01
description Although the architecture competition has been analysed through a number of rhetorical lenses, the recurring production of transcultural metaphors, particularly in international competitions, remains to be addressed as a genuine disciplinary phenomenon. The hypothesis of competitions as contact zones is particularly appropriate for the study of international events, in which competitors forge broad analogical figures to bridge cultural differences. Recent studies in the cognitive understanding of analogical matrices have considerably reinforced the theories on metaphors. Our analytical grid characterizes analogical matrices to identify levels of symbolic operations through the differentiation of formal, structural and conceptual analogies. We first dig into a sample of competition projects nicknames (Crystal, Birds’Nest, DNA, Cloud, Lace, Stealth, etc.) to confirm that these tropes have a paradoxical status at the intersection of architects’ intents and the public expectations. We then summarize an in-depth hermeneutical discourse analysis of 40 North American international competitions. This indicates a fourfold series of expectations to which competitors hope to provide answers in an international ‘conflict of interpretations’. Adhering to the theory of speech acts, we suggest that performative metaphors in competitions appear less as indicators of designers’ intentions than as products of the broader context surrounding competitions themselves. We conclude with a proposed grid indexing four types of contact zones in which metaphorical relationships are actively created and not just repeated.
url https://ojs-libaccp.tudelft.nl/index.php/footprint/article/view/3835
work_keys_str_mv AT jeanpierrechupin thisisnotanest
_version_ 1724280121919012864