Nitrate retention capacity of milldam-impacted legacy sediments and relict A horizon soils

While eutrophication is often attributed to contemporary nutrient pollution, there is growing evidence that past practices, like the accumulation of legacy sediment behind historic milldams, are also important. Given their prevalence, there is a critical need to understand how N flows through, a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J. N. Weitzman, J. P. Kaye
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2017-05-01
Series:SOIL
Online Access:http://www.soil-journal.net/3/95/2017/soil-3-95-2017.pdf
id doaj-0d177938e83e44deb6652726fade4d92
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0d177938e83e44deb6652726fade4d922020-11-25T00:52:42ZengCopernicus PublicationsSOIL2199-39712199-398X2017-05-0139511210.5194/soil-3-95-2017Nitrate retention capacity of milldam-impacted legacy sediments and relict A horizon soilsJ. N. Weitzman0J. N. Weitzman1J. P. Kaye2Department of Ecosystem Science and Management, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USAnow at: CUNY Advanced Research Center, 85 St. Nicholas Terrace, 5th Floor, New York, NY 10031, USADepartment of Ecosystem Science and Management, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USAWhile eutrophication is often attributed to contemporary nutrient pollution, there is growing evidence that past practices, like the accumulation of legacy sediment behind historic milldams, are also important. Given their prevalence, there is a critical need to understand how N flows through, and is retained in, legacy sediments to improve predictions and management of N transport from uplands to streams in the context of climatic variability and land-use change. Our goal was to determine how nitrate (NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>) is cycled through the soil of a legacy-sediment-strewn stream before and after soil drying. We extracted 10.16 cm radius intact soil columns that extended 30 cm into each of the three significant soil horizons at Big Spring Run (BSR) in Lancaster, Pennsylvania: surface legacy sediment characterized by a newly developing mineral A horizon soil, mid-layer legacy sediment consisting of mineral B horizon soil and a dark, organic-rich, buried relict A horizon soil. Columns were first preincubated at field capacity and then isotopically labeled nitrate (<sup>15</sup>NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>) was added and allowed to drain to estimate retention. The columns were then air-dried and subsequently rewet with N-free water and allowed to drain to quantify the drought-induced loss of <sup>15</sup>NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> from the different horizons. We found the highest initial <sup>15</sup>N retention in the mid-layer legacy sediment (17 ± 4 %) and buried relict A soil (14 ± 3 %) horizons, with significantly lower retention in the surface legacy sediment (6 ± 1 %) horizon. As expected, rewetting dry soil resulted in <sup>15</sup>N losses in all horizons, with the greatest losses in the buried relict A horizon soil, followed by the mid-layer legacy sediment and surface legacy sediment horizons. The <sup>15</sup>N remaining in the soil following the post-drought leaching was highest in the mid-layer legacy sediment, intermediate in the surface legacy sediment, and lowest in the buried relict A horizon soil. Fluctuations in the water table at BSR which affect saturation of the buried relict A horizon soil could lead to great loses of NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> from the soil, while vertical flow through the legacy-sediment-rich soil profile that originates in the surface has the potential to retain more NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>. Restoration that seeks to reconnect the groundwater and surface water, which will decrease the number of drying–rewetting events imposed on the relict A horizon soils, could initially lead to increased losses of NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> to nearby stream waters.http://www.soil-journal.net/3/95/2017/soil-3-95-2017.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author J. N. Weitzman
J. N. Weitzman
J. P. Kaye
spellingShingle J. N. Weitzman
J. N. Weitzman
J. P. Kaye
Nitrate retention capacity of milldam-impacted legacy sediments and relict A horizon soils
SOIL
author_facet J. N. Weitzman
J. N. Weitzman
J. P. Kaye
author_sort J. N. Weitzman
title Nitrate retention capacity of milldam-impacted legacy sediments and relict A horizon soils
title_short Nitrate retention capacity of milldam-impacted legacy sediments and relict A horizon soils
title_full Nitrate retention capacity of milldam-impacted legacy sediments and relict A horizon soils
title_fullStr Nitrate retention capacity of milldam-impacted legacy sediments and relict A horizon soils
title_full_unstemmed Nitrate retention capacity of milldam-impacted legacy sediments and relict A horizon soils
title_sort nitrate retention capacity of milldam-impacted legacy sediments and relict a horizon soils
publisher Copernicus Publications
series SOIL
issn 2199-3971
2199-398X
publishDate 2017-05-01
description While eutrophication is often attributed to contemporary nutrient pollution, there is growing evidence that past practices, like the accumulation of legacy sediment behind historic milldams, are also important. Given their prevalence, there is a critical need to understand how N flows through, and is retained in, legacy sediments to improve predictions and management of N transport from uplands to streams in the context of climatic variability and land-use change. Our goal was to determine how nitrate (NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>) is cycled through the soil of a legacy-sediment-strewn stream before and after soil drying. We extracted 10.16 cm radius intact soil columns that extended 30 cm into each of the three significant soil horizons at Big Spring Run (BSR) in Lancaster, Pennsylvania: surface legacy sediment characterized by a newly developing mineral A horizon soil, mid-layer legacy sediment consisting of mineral B horizon soil and a dark, organic-rich, buried relict A horizon soil. Columns were first preincubated at field capacity and then isotopically labeled nitrate (<sup>15</sup>NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>) was added and allowed to drain to estimate retention. The columns were then air-dried and subsequently rewet with N-free water and allowed to drain to quantify the drought-induced loss of <sup>15</sup>NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> from the different horizons. We found the highest initial <sup>15</sup>N retention in the mid-layer legacy sediment (17 ± 4 %) and buried relict A soil (14 ± 3 %) horizons, with significantly lower retention in the surface legacy sediment (6 ± 1 %) horizon. As expected, rewetting dry soil resulted in <sup>15</sup>N losses in all horizons, with the greatest losses in the buried relict A horizon soil, followed by the mid-layer legacy sediment and surface legacy sediment horizons. The <sup>15</sup>N remaining in the soil following the post-drought leaching was highest in the mid-layer legacy sediment, intermediate in the surface legacy sediment, and lowest in the buried relict A horizon soil. Fluctuations in the water table at BSR which affect saturation of the buried relict A horizon soil could lead to great loses of NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> from the soil, while vertical flow through the legacy-sediment-rich soil profile that originates in the surface has the potential to retain more NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>. Restoration that seeks to reconnect the groundwater and surface water, which will decrease the number of drying–rewetting events imposed on the relict A horizon soils, could initially lead to increased losses of NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> to nearby stream waters.
url http://www.soil-journal.net/3/95/2017/soil-3-95-2017.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jnweitzman nitrateretentioncapacityofmilldamimpactedlegacysedimentsandrelictahorizonsoils
AT jnweitzman nitrateretentioncapacityofmilldamimpactedlegacysedimentsandrelictahorizonsoils
AT jpkaye nitrateretentioncapacityofmilldamimpactedlegacysedimentsandrelictahorizonsoils
_version_ 1725240737869594624