Why Care About Robots? Empathy, Moral Standing, and the Language of Suffering

This paper tries to understand the phenomenon that humans are able to empathize with robots and the intuition that there might be something wrong with “abusing” robots by discussing the question regarding the moral standing of robots. After a review of some relevant work in empirical psychology and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Coeckelbergh Mark
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2018-06-01
Series:Kairos: Journal of Philosophy & Science
Subjects:
art
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2478/kjps-2018-0007
id doaj-0d12be61d3e34c119c44a83bf57b713b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0d12be61d3e34c119c44a83bf57b713b2021-09-05T21:02:08ZengSciendoKairos: Journal of Philosophy & Science1647-659X2018-06-0120114115810.2478/kjps-2018-0007kjps-2018-0007Why Care About Robots? Empathy, Moral Standing, and the Language of SufferingCoeckelbergh Mark0University of Vienna and De Montfort University (UK)This paper tries to understand the phenomenon that humans are able to empathize with robots and the intuition that there might be something wrong with “abusing” robots by discussing the question regarding the moral standing of robots. After a review of some relevant work in empirical psychology and a discussion of the ethics of empathizing with robots, a philosophical argument concerning the moral standing of robots is made that questions distant and uncritical moral reasoning about entities’ properties and that recommends first trying to understand the issue by means of philosophical and artistic work that shows how ethics is always relational and historical, and that highlights the importance of language and appearance in moral reasoning and moral psychology. It is concluded that attention to relationality and to verbal and non-verbal languages of suffering is key to understand the phenomenon under investigation, and that in robot ethics we need less certainty and more caution and patience when it comes to thinking about moral standing.https://doi.org/10.2478/kjps-2018-0007moral standingrobotsempathyrelationslanguageartphenomenologyhermeneuticswittgenstein
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Coeckelbergh Mark
spellingShingle Coeckelbergh Mark
Why Care About Robots? Empathy, Moral Standing, and the Language of Suffering
Kairos: Journal of Philosophy & Science
moral standing
robots
empathy
relations
language
art
phenomenology
hermeneutics
wittgenstein
author_facet Coeckelbergh Mark
author_sort Coeckelbergh Mark
title Why Care About Robots? Empathy, Moral Standing, and the Language of Suffering
title_short Why Care About Robots? Empathy, Moral Standing, and the Language of Suffering
title_full Why Care About Robots? Empathy, Moral Standing, and the Language of Suffering
title_fullStr Why Care About Robots? Empathy, Moral Standing, and the Language of Suffering
title_full_unstemmed Why Care About Robots? Empathy, Moral Standing, and the Language of Suffering
title_sort why care about robots? empathy, moral standing, and the language of suffering
publisher Sciendo
series Kairos: Journal of Philosophy & Science
issn 1647-659X
publishDate 2018-06-01
description This paper tries to understand the phenomenon that humans are able to empathize with robots and the intuition that there might be something wrong with “abusing” robots by discussing the question regarding the moral standing of robots. After a review of some relevant work in empirical psychology and a discussion of the ethics of empathizing with robots, a philosophical argument concerning the moral standing of robots is made that questions distant and uncritical moral reasoning about entities’ properties and that recommends first trying to understand the issue by means of philosophical and artistic work that shows how ethics is always relational and historical, and that highlights the importance of language and appearance in moral reasoning and moral psychology. It is concluded that attention to relationality and to verbal and non-verbal languages of suffering is key to understand the phenomenon under investigation, and that in robot ethics we need less certainty and more caution and patience when it comes to thinking about moral standing.
topic moral standing
robots
empathy
relations
language
art
phenomenology
hermeneutics
wittgenstein
url https://doi.org/10.2478/kjps-2018-0007
work_keys_str_mv AT coeckelberghmark whycareaboutrobotsempathymoralstandingandthelanguageofsuffering
_version_ 1717781216936067072