Force Concept Inventory-based multiple-choice test for investigating students’ representational consistency

This study investigates students’ ability to interpret multiple representations consistently (i.e., representational consistency) in the context of the force concept. For this purpose we developed the Representational Variant of the Force Concept Inventory (R-FCI), which makes use of nine items from...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pasi Nieminen, Antti Savinainen, Jouni Viiri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Physical Society 2010-08-01
Series:Physical Review Special Topics. Physics Education Research
Online Access:http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.6.020109
id doaj-0cfe3dfa5aa34a9c8666411c5415ecad
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0cfe3dfa5aa34a9c8666411c5415ecad2020-11-24T22:08:40ZengAmerican Physical SocietyPhysical Review Special Topics. Physics Education Research1554-91782010-08-0162Force Concept Inventory-based multiple-choice test for investigating students’ representational consistencyPasi NieminenAntti SavinainenJouni ViiriThis study investigates students’ ability to interpret multiple representations consistently (i.e., representational consistency) in the context of the force concept. For this purpose we developed the Representational Variant of the Force Concept Inventory (R-FCI), which makes use of nine items from the 1995 version of the Force Concept Inventory (FCI). These original FCI items were redesigned using various representations (such as motion map, vectorial and graphical), yielding 27 multiple-choice items concerning four central concepts underpinning the force concept: Newton’s first, second, and third laws, and gravitation. We provide some evidence for the validity and reliability of the R-FCI; this analysis is limited to the student population of one Finnish high school. The students took the R-FCI at the beginning and at the end of their first high school physics course. We found that students’ (n=168) representational consistency (whether scientifically correct or not) varied considerably depending on the concept. On average, representational consistency and scientifically correct understanding increased during the instruction, although in the post-test only a few students performed consistently both in terms of representations and scientifically correct understanding. We also compared students’ (n=87) results of the R-FCI and the FCI, and found that they correlated quite well.http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.6.020109
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Pasi Nieminen
Antti Savinainen
Jouni Viiri
spellingShingle Pasi Nieminen
Antti Savinainen
Jouni Viiri
Force Concept Inventory-based multiple-choice test for investigating students’ representational consistency
Physical Review Special Topics. Physics Education Research
author_facet Pasi Nieminen
Antti Savinainen
Jouni Viiri
author_sort Pasi Nieminen
title Force Concept Inventory-based multiple-choice test for investigating students’ representational consistency
title_short Force Concept Inventory-based multiple-choice test for investigating students’ representational consistency
title_full Force Concept Inventory-based multiple-choice test for investigating students’ representational consistency
title_fullStr Force Concept Inventory-based multiple-choice test for investigating students’ representational consistency
title_full_unstemmed Force Concept Inventory-based multiple-choice test for investigating students’ representational consistency
title_sort force concept inventory-based multiple-choice test for investigating students’ representational consistency
publisher American Physical Society
series Physical Review Special Topics. Physics Education Research
issn 1554-9178
publishDate 2010-08-01
description This study investigates students’ ability to interpret multiple representations consistently (i.e., representational consistency) in the context of the force concept. For this purpose we developed the Representational Variant of the Force Concept Inventory (R-FCI), which makes use of nine items from the 1995 version of the Force Concept Inventory (FCI). These original FCI items were redesigned using various representations (such as motion map, vectorial and graphical), yielding 27 multiple-choice items concerning four central concepts underpinning the force concept: Newton’s first, second, and third laws, and gravitation. We provide some evidence for the validity and reliability of the R-FCI; this analysis is limited to the student population of one Finnish high school. The students took the R-FCI at the beginning and at the end of their first high school physics course. We found that students’ (n=168) representational consistency (whether scientifically correct or not) varied considerably depending on the concept. On average, representational consistency and scientifically correct understanding increased during the instruction, although in the post-test only a few students performed consistently both in terms of representations and scientifically correct understanding. We also compared students’ (n=87) results of the R-FCI and the FCI, and found that they correlated quite well.
url http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.6.020109
work_keys_str_mv AT pasinieminen forceconceptinventorybasedmultiplechoicetestforinvestigatingstudentsrepresentationalconsistency
AT anttisavinainen forceconceptinventorybasedmultiplechoicetestforinvestigatingstudentsrepresentationalconsistency
AT jouniviiri forceconceptinventorybasedmultiplechoicetestforinvestigatingstudentsrepresentationalconsistency
_version_ 1716591350843965440