Molecular Reconstruction of an Old Pedigree of Diploid and Triploid Hydrangea macrophylla Genotypes

The ornamental crop species Hydrangea macrophylla exhibits diploid and triploid levels of ploidy and develops lacecap (wild type) or mophead inflorescences. In order to characterize a H. macrophylla germplasm collection, we determined the inflorescence type and the 2C DNA content of 120 plants repre...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter Hempel, Annette Hohe, Conny Tränkner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Plant Science
Subjects:
SSR
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2018.00429/full
id doaj-0ce32182e87a436c96d25330c102609b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0ce32182e87a436c96d25330c102609b2020-11-24T23:24:48ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Plant Science1664-462X2018-04-01910.3389/fpls.2018.00429323932Molecular Reconstruction of an Old Pedigree of Diploid and Triploid Hydrangea macrophylla GenotypesPeter Hempel0Peter Hempel1Annette Hohe2Annette Hohe3Conny Tränkner4Leibniz Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops, Erfurt, GermanyFaculty of Landscape Architecture, Horticulture and Forestry, University of Applied Sciences Erfurt, Erfurt, GermanyLeibniz Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops, Erfurt, GermanyFaculty of Landscape Architecture, Horticulture and Forestry, University of Applied Sciences Erfurt, Erfurt, GermanyLeibniz Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops, Erfurt, GermanyThe ornamental crop species Hydrangea macrophylla exhibits diploid and triploid levels of ploidy and develops lacecap (wild type) or mophead inflorescences. In order to characterize a H. macrophylla germplasm collection, we determined the inflorescence type and the 2C DNA content of 120 plants representing 43 cultivars. We identified 78 putative diploid and 39 putative triploid plants by flow cytometry. In our collection 69 out of 98 flowering plants produced lacecap inflorescences, whereas 29 plants developed mophead inflorescences. Surprisingly, 12 cultivars included diploid as well as triploid plants, while 5 cultivars contained plants with different inflorescence types. We genotyped this germplasm collection using 12 SSR markers that detected 2–7 alleles per marker, and identified 51 different alleles in this collection. We detected 62 distinct fingerprints, revealing a higher genetic variation than the number of cultivars suggested. Only one genotype per cultivar is expected due to the vegetative propagation of Hydrangea cultivars; however we identified 25 cultivars containing 2–4 different genotypes. These different genotypes explained the variation in DNA content and inflorescence type. Diploid and triploid plants with the same cultivar name were exclusively mix-ups. We therefor assume, that 36% of the tested plants were mislabeled. Based on the “Wädenswil” pedigree, which includes 31 of the tested cultivars, we predicted cultivar-specific fingerprints and identified at least 21 out of 31 cultivars by SSR marker-based reconstruction of the “Wädenswil” pedigree. Furthermore, we detected 4 putative interploid crosses between diploid and triploid plants in this pedigree. These interploid crosses resulted in diploid or/and triploid offspring, suggesting that crosses with triploids were successfully applied in breeding of H. macrophylla.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2018.00429/fullgenotype identificationgene bankinterploid crossesmicrosatelliteSSRfingerprint
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Peter Hempel
Peter Hempel
Annette Hohe
Annette Hohe
Conny Tränkner
spellingShingle Peter Hempel
Peter Hempel
Annette Hohe
Annette Hohe
Conny Tränkner
Molecular Reconstruction of an Old Pedigree of Diploid and Triploid Hydrangea macrophylla Genotypes
Frontiers in Plant Science
genotype identification
gene bank
interploid crosses
microsatellite
SSR
fingerprint
author_facet Peter Hempel
Peter Hempel
Annette Hohe
Annette Hohe
Conny Tränkner
author_sort Peter Hempel
title Molecular Reconstruction of an Old Pedigree of Diploid and Triploid Hydrangea macrophylla Genotypes
title_short Molecular Reconstruction of an Old Pedigree of Diploid and Triploid Hydrangea macrophylla Genotypes
title_full Molecular Reconstruction of an Old Pedigree of Diploid and Triploid Hydrangea macrophylla Genotypes
title_fullStr Molecular Reconstruction of an Old Pedigree of Diploid and Triploid Hydrangea macrophylla Genotypes
title_full_unstemmed Molecular Reconstruction of an Old Pedigree of Diploid and Triploid Hydrangea macrophylla Genotypes
title_sort molecular reconstruction of an old pedigree of diploid and triploid hydrangea macrophylla genotypes
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Plant Science
issn 1664-462X
publishDate 2018-04-01
description The ornamental crop species Hydrangea macrophylla exhibits diploid and triploid levels of ploidy and develops lacecap (wild type) or mophead inflorescences. In order to characterize a H. macrophylla germplasm collection, we determined the inflorescence type and the 2C DNA content of 120 plants representing 43 cultivars. We identified 78 putative diploid and 39 putative triploid plants by flow cytometry. In our collection 69 out of 98 flowering plants produced lacecap inflorescences, whereas 29 plants developed mophead inflorescences. Surprisingly, 12 cultivars included diploid as well as triploid plants, while 5 cultivars contained plants with different inflorescence types. We genotyped this germplasm collection using 12 SSR markers that detected 2–7 alleles per marker, and identified 51 different alleles in this collection. We detected 62 distinct fingerprints, revealing a higher genetic variation than the number of cultivars suggested. Only one genotype per cultivar is expected due to the vegetative propagation of Hydrangea cultivars; however we identified 25 cultivars containing 2–4 different genotypes. These different genotypes explained the variation in DNA content and inflorescence type. Diploid and triploid plants with the same cultivar name were exclusively mix-ups. We therefor assume, that 36% of the tested plants were mislabeled. Based on the “Wädenswil” pedigree, which includes 31 of the tested cultivars, we predicted cultivar-specific fingerprints and identified at least 21 out of 31 cultivars by SSR marker-based reconstruction of the “Wädenswil” pedigree. Furthermore, we detected 4 putative interploid crosses between diploid and triploid plants in this pedigree. These interploid crosses resulted in diploid or/and triploid offspring, suggesting that crosses with triploids were successfully applied in breeding of H. macrophylla.
topic genotype identification
gene bank
interploid crosses
microsatellite
SSR
fingerprint
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2018.00429/full
work_keys_str_mv AT peterhempel molecularreconstructionofanoldpedigreeofdiploidandtriploidhydrangeamacrophyllagenotypes
AT peterhempel molecularreconstructionofanoldpedigreeofdiploidandtriploidhydrangeamacrophyllagenotypes
AT annettehohe molecularreconstructionofanoldpedigreeofdiploidandtriploidhydrangeamacrophyllagenotypes
AT annettehohe molecularreconstructionofanoldpedigreeofdiploidandtriploidhydrangeamacrophyllagenotypes
AT connytrankner molecularreconstructionofanoldpedigreeofdiploidandtriploidhydrangeamacrophyllagenotypes
_version_ 1725558720434274304