Identification of germline cancer predisposition variants during clinical ctDNA testing

Abstract Next-generation sequencing of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a non-invasive method to guide therapy selection for cancer patients. ctDNA variant allele frequency (VAF) is commonly reported and may aid in discerning whether a variant is germline or somatic. We report on the fidelity of VAF...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Leigh Anne Stout, Nawal Kassem, Cynthia Hunter, Santosh Philips, Milan Radovich, Bryan P. Schneider
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2021-07-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93084-0
id doaj-0cc58bca3e134f00802d49538b3886c5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0cc58bca3e134f00802d49538b3886c52021-07-04T11:31:10ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222021-07-011111910.1038/s41598-021-93084-0Identification of germline cancer predisposition variants during clinical ctDNA testingLeigh Anne Stout0Nawal Kassem1Cynthia Hunter2Santosh Philips3Milan Radovich4Bryan P. Schneider5Indiana University School of MedicineIndiana University School of MedicineIndiana University School of MedicineIndiana University School of MedicineIndiana University School of MedicineIndiana University School of MedicineAbstract Next-generation sequencing of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a non-invasive method to guide therapy selection for cancer patients. ctDNA variant allele frequency (VAF) is commonly reported and may aid in discerning whether a variant is germline or somatic. We report on the fidelity of VAF in ctDNA as a predictor for germline variant carriage. Two patient cohorts were studied. Cohort 1 included patients with known germline variants. Cohort 2 included patients with any variant detected by the ctDNA assay with VAF of 40–60%. In cohort 1, 36 of 91 (40%) known germline variants were identified through ctDNA analysis with a VAF of 39–87.6%. In cohort 2, 111 of 160 (69%) variants identified by ctDNA analysis with a VAF between 40 and 60% were found to be germline. Therefore, variants with a VAF between 40 and 60% should induce suspicion for germline status but should not be used as a replacement for germline testing.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93084-0
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Leigh Anne Stout
Nawal Kassem
Cynthia Hunter
Santosh Philips
Milan Radovich
Bryan P. Schneider
spellingShingle Leigh Anne Stout
Nawal Kassem
Cynthia Hunter
Santosh Philips
Milan Radovich
Bryan P. Schneider
Identification of germline cancer predisposition variants during clinical ctDNA testing
Scientific Reports
author_facet Leigh Anne Stout
Nawal Kassem
Cynthia Hunter
Santosh Philips
Milan Radovich
Bryan P. Schneider
author_sort Leigh Anne Stout
title Identification of germline cancer predisposition variants during clinical ctDNA testing
title_short Identification of germline cancer predisposition variants during clinical ctDNA testing
title_full Identification of germline cancer predisposition variants during clinical ctDNA testing
title_fullStr Identification of germline cancer predisposition variants during clinical ctDNA testing
title_full_unstemmed Identification of germline cancer predisposition variants during clinical ctDNA testing
title_sort identification of germline cancer predisposition variants during clinical ctdna testing
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Abstract Next-generation sequencing of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a non-invasive method to guide therapy selection for cancer patients. ctDNA variant allele frequency (VAF) is commonly reported and may aid in discerning whether a variant is germline or somatic. We report on the fidelity of VAF in ctDNA as a predictor for germline variant carriage. Two patient cohorts were studied. Cohort 1 included patients with known germline variants. Cohort 2 included patients with any variant detected by the ctDNA assay with VAF of 40–60%. In cohort 1, 36 of 91 (40%) known germline variants were identified through ctDNA analysis with a VAF of 39–87.6%. In cohort 2, 111 of 160 (69%) variants identified by ctDNA analysis with a VAF between 40 and 60% were found to be germline. Therefore, variants with a VAF between 40 and 60% should induce suspicion for germline status but should not be used as a replacement for germline testing.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93084-0
work_keys_str_mv AT leighannestout identificationofgermlinecancerpredispositionvariantsduringclinicalctdnatesting
AT nawalkassem identificationofgermlinecancerpredispositionvariantsduringclinicalctdnatesting
AT cynthiahunter identificationofgermlinecancerpredispositionvariantsduringclinicalctdnatesting
AT santoshphilips identificationofgermlinecancerpredispositionvariantsduringclinicalctdnatesting
AT milanradovich identificationofgermlinecancerpredispositionvariantsduringclinicalctdnatesting
AT bryanpschneider identificationofgermlinecancerpredispositionvariantsduringclinicalctdnatesting
_version_ 1721320158198235136