Rethinking Debates in Narrative Methods: Narrative Orthodoxy and Research Challenges with Children with Intellectual Disability

Undertaking narrative research with children with intellectual disability is a practical, ethical and methodological challenge. Rather than the traditional focus on how this challenge can be overcome, this paper takes up an alternative position by focusing on the relationship between disability and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Susan Flynn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Stockholm University Press 2019-07-01
Series:Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.sjdr.se/articles/613
id doaj-0cbd136481174d999c9b35e1d1b03ae8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0cbd136481174d999c9b35e1d1b03ae82020-11-24T22:09:53ZengStockholm University PressScandinavian Journal of Disability Research1745-30112019-07-0121110.16993/sjdr.613527Rethinking Debates in Narrative Methods: Narrative Orthodoxy and Research Challenges with Children with Intellectual DisabilitySusan Flynn0IT SligoUndertaking narrative research with children with intellectual disability is a practical, ethical and methodological challenge. Rather than the traditional focus on how this challenge can be overcome, this paper takes up an alternative position by focusing on the relationship between disability and the wider narrative research environment. The focused commentary on the literature provided interjects into narrative methods debates by questioning what this challenge teaches us about the taken-for-granted tenets of the narrative approach. The commentary draws out broad themes from existing literature and is declared from the outset as operating from the theoretical field of critical disability studies. Specifically, the review takes up Fiona Kumari Campbell’s work on ableism, requiring that analysis and focus on amending problems that disability draws attention to does not remain with children with disability. Rather, a refocus towards implementing change within broader ableist practices, in this case within narrative research orthodoxy, is obligatory.https://www.sjdr.se/articles/613narrative inquiryintellectual disabilitychildren
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Susan Flynn
spellingShingle Susan Flynn
Rethinking Debates in Narrative Methods: Narrative Orthodoxy and Research Challenges with Children with Intellectual Disability
Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research
narrative inquiry
intellectual disability
children
author_facet Susan Flynn
author_sort Susan Flynn
title Rethinking Debates in Narrative Methods: Narrative Orthodoxy and Research Challenges with Children with Intellectual Disability
title_short Rethinking Debates in Narrative Methods: Narrative Orthodoxy and Research Challenges with Children with Intellectual Disability
title_full Rethinking Debates in Narrative Methods: Narrative Orthodoxy and Research Challenges with Children with Intellectual Disability
title_fullStr Rethinking Debates in Narrative Methods: Narrative Orthodoxy and Research Challenges with Children with Intellectual Disability
title_full_unstemmed Rethinking Debates in Narrative Methods: Narrative Orthodoxy and Research Challenges with Children with Intellectual Disability
title_sort rethinking debates in narrative methods: narrative orthodoxy and research challenges with children with intellectual disability
publisher Stockholm University Press
series Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research
issn 1745-3011
publishDate 2019-07-01
description Undertaking narrative research with children with intellectual disability is a practical, ethical and methodological challenge. Rather than the traditional focus on how this challenge can be overcome, this paper takes up an alternative position by focusing on the relationship between disability and the wider narrative research environment. The focused commentary on the literature provided interjects into narrative methods debates by questioning what this challenge teaches us about the taken-for-granted tenets of the narrative approach. The commentary draws out broad themes from existing literature and is declared from the outset as operating from the theoretical field of critical disability studies. Specifically, the review takes up Fiona Kumari Campbell’s work on ableism, requiring that analysis and focus on amending problems that disability draws attention to does not remain with children with disability. Rather, a refocus towards implementing change within broader ableist practices, in this case within narrative research orthodoxy, is obligatory.
topic narrative inquiry
intellectual disability
children
url https://www.sjdr.se/articles/613
work_keys_str_mv AT susanflynn rethinkingdebatesinnarrativemethodsnarrativeorthodoxyandresearchchallengeswithchildrenwithintellectualdisability
_version_ 1725810240255950848