Are predation rates comparable between natural and artificial open-cup tree nests in boreal forest landscapes?

Nest predation studies often use artificial nests to secure sample sizes and nest distribution patterns that allow empirically testing differences in predation rates between ecological units of interest. These studies rely on the assumption that natural and artificial nests experience similar or con...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Katrine S Hoset, Magne Husby
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210151
id doaj-0ca128f767d1493dae5bc408ada31298
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0ca128f767d1493dae5bc408ada312982021-03-03T20:58:48ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-01141e021015110.1371/journal.pone.0210151Are predation rates comparable between natural and artificial open-cup tree nests in boreal forest landscapes?Katrine S HosetMagne HusbyNest predation studies often use artificial nests to secure sample sizes and nest distribution patterns that allow empirically testing differences in predation rates between ecological units of interest. These studies rely on the assumption that natural and artificial nests experience similar or consistent relative predation rates across ecological gradients. As this assumption may depend on several factors (for example differences in predator community, nest construction, parental care patterns), it is important to test whether artificial nests provide adequate and comparable estimates of predation rates to natural nests. In this study, we compare predation rates of above-ground natural open-cup nests, artificial nests and natural nests with artificial eggs along a forest gradient from edge to interior (interior, transition zone and edge) and within two nest visibility classes (visible and concealed). Our aim was to determine whether nest structure affects comparability between nest types along these ecological gradients in boreal forests. Our results indicated important contributions of nest type, nest visibility and location along the forest edge-interior gradient, but no variable had strong significant effects on predation rates, except exposure time that showed lower predation rates at longer exposure times. Predation rates in visible and concealed nests remained similar for all nest types, but not along the forest edge-interior gradient. Here, artificial nests showed much lower predation rates than natural nests, whereas natural nests with artificial eggs tended to have higher predation rates than natural nests. We conclude that artificial nests in boreal forests represent an adequate measure of relative nest predation risk in open-cup natural nests along some ecological gradients, but results on predation rates along forest edge-interior gradients obtained from artificial nests should be interpreted with care.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210151
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Katrine S Hoset
Magne Husby
spellingShingle Katrine S Hoset
Magne Husby
Are predation rates comparable between natural and artificial open-cup tree nests in boreal forest landscapes?
PLoS ONE
author_facet Katrine S Hoset
Magne Husby
author_sort Katrine S Hoset
title Are predation rates comparable between natural and artificial open-cup tree nests in boreal forest landscapes?
title_short Are predation rates comparable between natural and artificial open-cup tree nests in boreal forest landscapes?
title_full Are predation rates comparable between natural and artificial open-cup tree nests in boreal forest landscapes?
title_fullStr Are predation rates comparable between natural and artificial open-cup tree nests in boreal forest landscapes?
title_full_unstemmed Are predation rates comparable between natural and artificial open-cup tree nests in boreal forest landscapes?
title_sort are predation rates comparable between natural and artificial open-cup tree nests in boreal forest landscapes?
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Nest predation studies often use artificial nests to secure sample sizes and nest distribution patterns that allow empirically testing differences in predation rates between ecological units of interest. These studies rely on the assumption that natural and artificial nests experience similar or consistent relative predation rates across ecological gradients. As this assumption may depend on several factors (for example differences in predator community, nest construction, parental care patterns), it is important to test whether artificial nests provide adequate and comparable estimates of predation rates to natural nests. In this study, we compare predation rates of above-ground natural open-cup nests, artificial nests and natural nests with artificial eggs along a forest gradient from edge to interior (interior, transition zone and edge) and within two nest visibility classes (visible and concealed). Our aim was to determine whether nest structure affects comparability between nest types along these ecological gradients in boreal forests. Our results indicated important contributions of nest type, nest visibility and location along the forest edge-interior gradient, but no variable had strong significant effects on predation rates, except exposure time that showed lower predation rates at longer exposure times. Predation rates in visible and concealed nests remained similar for all nest types, but not along the forest edge-interior gradient. Here, artificial nests showed much lower predation rates than natural nests, whereas natural nests with artificial eggs tended to have higher predation rates than natural nests. We conclude that artificial nests in boreal forests represent an adequate measure of relative nest predation risk in open-cup natural nests along some ecological gradients, but results on predation rates along forest edge-interior gradients obtained from artificial nests should be interpreted with care.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210151
work_keys_str_mv AT katrineshoset arepredationratescomparablebetweennaturalandartificialopencuptreenestsinborealforestlandscapes
AT magnehusby arepredationratescomparablebetweennaturalandartificialopencuptreenestsinborealforestlandscapes
_version_ 1714819353798508544