Model-Based Evaluation of Land Management Strategies with Regard to Multiple Ecosystem Services

In agroecosystem management, conflicts between various services such as food provision and nutrient regulation are common. This study examined the trade-offs between selected ecosystem services such as food provision, water quantity and quality, erosion and climate regulations in an agricultural cat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nina Zarrineh, Karim C. Abbaspour, Ann van Griensven, Bernard Jeangros, Annelie Holzkämper
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-10-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/11/3844
id doaj-0c9715377c034cbfa99d3f25923b9ee3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0c9715377c034cbfa99d3f25923b9ee32020-11-24T20:44:55ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502018-10-011011384410.3390/su10113844su10113844Model-Based Evaluation of Land Management Strategies with Regard to Multiple Ecosystem ServicesNina Zarrineh0Karim C. Abbaspour1Ann van Griensven2Bernard Jeangros3Annelie Holzkämper4Agroscope, Agroecology and Environment Division, Reckenholzstrasse 191, CH-8046 Zürich, SwitzerlandEawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, P.O. Box 611, CH-8600 Dübendorf, SwitzerlandVrije Universiteit Brussel, Department of Hydrology and Hydraulic Engineering, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, BelgiumAgroscope, Plant Production Systems, CH-1260 Nyon, SwitzerlandAgroscope, Agroecology and Environment Division, Reckenholzstrasse 191, CH-8046 Zürich, SwitzerlandIn agroecosystem management, conflicts between various services such as food provision and nutrient regulation are common. This study examined the trade-offs between selected ecosystem services such as food provision, water quantity and quality, erosion and climate regulations in an agricultural catchment in Western Switzerland. The aim was to explore the existing land use conflicts by a shift in land use and management strategy following two stakeholder-defined scenarios based on either land sparing or land sharing concepts. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) was used to build an agro-hydrologic model of the region, which was calibrated and validated based on daily river discharge, monthly nitrate and annual crop yield, considering uncertainties associated with land management set up and model parameterization. The results show that land sparing scenario has the highest agricultural benefit, while also the highest nitrate concentration and GHG emissions. The land sharing scenario improves water quality and climate regulation services and reduces food provision. The management changes considered in the two land use scenarios did not seem to reduce the conflict but only led to a shift in trade-offs. Water quantity and erosion regulation remain unaffected by the two scenarios.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/11/3844SWAT modelmodel parameterizationland sharingland sparingwater quantitywater qualitygreenhouse gas emissionsagriculturemultifunctionality
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nina Zarrineh
Karim C. Abbaspour
Ann van Griensven
Bernard Jeangros
Annelie Holzkämper
spellingShingle Nina Zarrineh
Karim C. Abbaspour
Ann van Griensven
Bernard Jeangros
Annelie Holzkämper
Model-Based Evaluation of Land Management Strategies with Regard to Multiple Ecosystem Services
Sustainability
SWAT model
model parameterization
land sharing
land sparing
water quantity
water quality
greenhouse gas emissions
agriculture
multifunctionality
author_facet Nina Zarrineh
Karim C. Abbaspour
Ann van Griensven
Bernard Jeangros
Annelie Holzkämper
author_sort Nina Zarrineh
title Model-Based Evaluation of Land Management Strategies with Regard to Multiple Ecosystem Services
title_short Model-Based Evaluation of Land Management Strategies with Regard to Multiple Ecosystem Services
title_full Model-Based Evaluation of Land Management Strategies with Regard to Multiple Ecosystem Services
title_fullStr Model-Based Evaluation of Land Management Strategies with Regard to Multiple Ecosystem Services
title_full_unstemmed Model-Based Evaluation of Land Management Strategies with Regard to Multiple Ecosystem Services
title_sort model-based evaluation of land management strategies with regard to multiple ecosystem services
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2018-10-01
description In agroecosystem management, conflicts between various services such as food provision and nutrient regulation are common. This study examined the trade-offs between selected ecosystem services such as food provision, water quantity and quality, erosion and climate regulations in an agricultural catchment in Western Switzerland. The aim was to explore the existing land use conflicts by a shift in land use and management strategy following two stakeholder-defined scenarios based on either land sparing or land sharing concepts. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) was used to build an agro-hydrologic model of the region, which was calibrated and validated based on daily river discharge, monthly nitrate and annual crop yield, considering uncertainties associated with land management set up and model parameterization. The results show that land sparing scenario has the highest agricultural benefit, while also the highest nitrate concentration and GHG emissions. The land sharing scenario improves water quality and climate regulation services and reduces food provision. The management changes considered in the two land use scenarios did not seem to reduce the conflict but only led to a shift in trade-offs. Water quantity and erosion regulation remain unaffected by the two scenarios.
topic SWAT model
model parameterization
land sharing
land sparing
water quantity
water quality
greenhouse gas emissions
agriculture
multifunctionality
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/11/3844
work_keys_str_mv AT ninazarrineh modelbasedevaluationoflandmanagementstrategieswithregardtomultipleecosystemservices
AT karimcabbaspour modelbasedevaluationoflandmanagementstrategieswithregardtomultipleecosystemservices
AT annvangriensven modelbasedevaluationoflandmanagementstrategieswithregardtomultipleecosystemservices
AT bernardjeangros modelbasedevaluationoflandmanagementstrategieswithregardtomultipleecosystemservices
AT annelieholzkamper modelbasedevaluationoflandmanagementstrategieswithregardtomultipleecosystemservices
_version_ 1716816176246423552