Comparing IDREAM as an Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm against In Filtered Back Projection in Computed Tomography
<strong><em>Introduction:</em></strong> Recent studies of Computed Tomography (CT) conducted on patient dose reduction have recommended using an iterative reconstruction algorithm and mA (mili-Ampere) dose modulation. The current study aimed to evaluate Iterative Dose Reducti...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
2020-05-01
|
Series: | Iranian Journal of Medical Physics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ijmp.mums.ac.ir/article_13925_cc10cc0edbb680540b14462da7acf61f.pdf |
id |
doaj-0c87cc8c701a4cd2877e79f26c588e03 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0c87cc8c701a4cd2877e79f26c588e032020-11-25T03:35:36ZengMashhad University of Medical SciencesIranian Journal of Medical Physics2345-36722345-36722020-05-0117317017410.22038/ijmp.2019.41872.161313925Comparing IDREAM as an Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm against In Filtered Back Projection in Computed TomographyEslam Maamoun0cairo ,egypt<strong><em>Introduction:</em></strong> Recent studies of Computed Tomography (CT) conducted on patient dose reduction have recommended using an iterative reconstruction algorithm and mA (mili-Ampere) dose modulation. The current study aimed to evaluate Iterative Dose Reduction Algorithm (IDREAM) as an iterative reconstruction algorithm. <strong><em>Material and Methods:</em></strong> Two CT protocols (i.e., A: 120 KV /150 mA, FBP; B: 120KV/ (20-150) mAs, IDREAM) to scan water and acrylic phantoms. A number of 40 patients were assigned to two CT protocols (C: n=20, 120KV/160 ±10 mAs, FBP and D: n=20, 120 KV/ (30-150 mAs, IDREAM), the two groups (C and D) were then referred to abdomen and pelvis CT scan (Sinovision, insitum 16) with contrast. Image quality parameters, dose calculations were measured for all groups (i.e., A, B, C, and D). <strong><em>Results:</em></strong> Group B had a highly significant SNR with less significant noise (P<0.05), in comparison with group A. In addition, uniformity was markedly higher for group B (P<0.05) in water phantom and insignificantly different (P>0.05) in acrylic phantom, as compared to group A. CTDIvol (A: 13.94 mGy ; B: 6.91 mGy , P<0.05 ) and DLP (A:501.76 mGy.cm ; B :248.88 mGy.cm). Noise and SNR were significantly different (P<0.05) in group D against C. CTDIvol (C: 30.3±5.2 mGy ; D : 15.4 ±2.7 mGy, P<0.05 ) , DLP (C:544±100 mGy.cm; D :272.3±50.3 mGy.cm ,P<0.05) and the effective dose (C:8.1±1.5 mSv; D :4.08±0.75 mSv,P<0.05) <strong><em>Conclusion: </em></strong>The results of the present study were indicative of the feasibility of IDREAMas an iterative reconstruction algorithm.http://ijmp.mums.ac.ir/article_13925_cc10cc0edbb680540b14462da7acf61f.pdfcomputed tomographyfbpidreamimage noiseimage qualityiterative algorithm snr |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Eslam Maamoun |
spellingShingle |
Eslam Maamoun Comparing IDREAM as an Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm against In Filtered Back Projection in Computed Tomography Iranian Journal of Medical Physics computed tomography fbp idream image noise image quality iterative algorithm snr |
author_facet |
Eslam Maamoun |
author_sort |
Eslam Maamoun |
title |
Comparing IDREAM as an Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm against In Filtered Back Projection in Computed Tomography |
title_short |
Comparing IDREAM as an Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm against In Filtered Back Projection in Computed Tomography |
title_full |
Comparing IDREAM as an Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm against In Filtered Back Projection in Computed Tomography |
title_fullStr |
Comparing IDREAM as an Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm against In Filtered Back Projection in Computed Tomography |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparing IDREAM as an Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm against In Filtered Back Projection in Computed Tomography |
title_sort |
comparing idream as an iterative reconstruction algorithm against in filtered back projection in computed tomography |
publisher |
Mashhad University of Medical Sciences |
series |
Iranian Journal of Medical Physics |
issn |
2345-3672 2345-3672 |
publishDate |
2020-05-01 |
description |
<strong><em>Introduction:</em></strong> Recent studies of Computed Tomography (CT) conducted on patient dose reduction have recommended using an iterative reconstruction algorithm and mA (mili-Ampere) dose modulation. The current study aimed to evaluate Iterative Dose Reduction Algorithm (IDREAM) as an iterative reconstruction algorithm.
<strong><em>Material and Methods:</em></strong> Two CT protocols (i.e., A: 120 KV /150 mA, FBP; B: 120KV/ (20-150) mAs, IDREAM) to scan water and acrylic phantoms. A number of 40 patients were assigned to two CT protocols (C: n=20, 120KV/160 ±10 mAs, FBP and D: n=20, 120 KV/ (30-150 mAs, IDREAM), the two groups (C and D) were then referred to abdomen and pelvis CT scan (Sinovision, insitum 16) with contrast. Image quality parameters, dose calculations were measured for all groups (i.e., A, B, C, and D).
<strong><em>Results:</em></strong> Group B had a highly significant SNR with less significant noise (P<0.05), in comparison with group A. In addition, uniformity was markedly higher for group B (P<0.05) in water phantom and insignificantly different (P>0.05) in acrylic phantom, as compared to group A. CTDIvol (A: 13.94 mGy ; B: 6.91 mGy , P<0.05 ) and DLP (A:501.76 mGy.cm ; B :248.88 mGy.cm). Noise and SNR were significantly different (P<0.05) in group D against C. CTDIvol (C: 30.3±5.2 mGy ; D : 15.4 ±2.7 mGy, P<0.05 ) , DLP (C:544±100 mGy.cm; D :272.3±50.3 mGy.cm ,P<0.05) and the effective dose (C:8.1±1.5 mSv; D :4.08±0.75 mSv,P<0.05)
<strong><em>Conclusion: </em></strong>The results of the present study were indicative of the feasibility of IDREAMas an iterative reconstruction algorithm. |
topic |
computed tomography fbp idream image noise image quality iterative algorithm snr |
url |
http://ijmp.mums.ac.ir/article_13925_cc10cc0edbb680540b14462da7acf61f.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT eslammaamoun comparingidreamasaniterativereconstructionalgorithmagainstinfilteredbackprojectionincomputedtomography |
_version_ |
1724553483878662144 |