Comparing IDREAM as an Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm against In Filtered Back Projection in Computed Tomography

<strong><em>Introduction:</em></strong> Recent studies of Computed Tomography (CT) conducted on patient dose reduction have recommended using an iterative reconstruction algorithm and mA (mili-Ampere) dose modulation. The current study aimed to evaluate Iterative Dose Reducti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Eslam Maamoun
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Mashhad University of Medical Sciences 2020-05-01
Series:Iranian Journal of Medical Physics
Subjects:
fbp
Online Access:http://ijmp.mums.ac.ir/article_13925_cc10cc0edbb680540b14462da7acf61f.pdf
id doaj-0c87cc8c701a4cd2877e79f26c588e03
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0c87cc8c701a4cd2877e79f26c588e032020-11-25T03:35:36ZengMashhad University of Medical SciencesIranian Journal of Medical Physics2345-36722345-36722020-05-0117317017410.22038/ijmp.2019.41872.161313925Comparing IDREAM as an Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm against In Filtered Back Projection in Computed TomographyEslam Maamoun0cairo ,egypt<strong><em>Introduction:</em></strong> Recent studies of Computed Tomography (CT) conducted on patient dose reduction have recommended using an iterative reconstruction algorithm and mA (mili-Ampere) dose modulation. The current study aimed to evaluate Iterative Dose Reduction Algorithm (IDREAM) as an iterative reconstruction algorithm. <strong><em>Material and Methods:</em></strong> Two CT protocols (i.e., A: 120 KV /150 mA, FBP; B: 120KV/ (20-150) mAs, IDREAM) to scan water and acrylic phantoms. A number of 40 patients were assigned to two CT protocols (C: n=20, 120KV/160 ±10 mAs, FBP and D: n=20, 120 KV/ (30-150 mAs, IDREAM), the two groups (C and D) were then referred to abdomen and pelvis CT scan (Sinovision, insitum 16) with contrast. Image quality parameters, dose calculations were measured for all groups (i.e., A, B, C, and D). <strong><em>Results:</em></strong> Group B had a highly significant SNR with less significant noise (P<0.05), in comparison with group A. In addition, uniformity was markedly higher for group B (P<0.05) in water phantom and insignificantly different (P>0.05) in acrylic phantom, as compared to group A.  CTDIvol (A: 13.94 mGy ; B: 6.91 mGy , P<0.05  ) and   DLP (A:501.76 mGy.cm ; B :248.88 mGy.cm). Noise and SNR were significantly different (P<0.05) in group D against C. CTDIvol (C: 30.3±5.2 mGy ; D : 15.4 ±2.7 mGy, P<0.05 ) ,   DLP (C:544±100 mGy.cm; D :272.3±50.3 mGy.cm ,P<0.05) and the effective dose (C:8.1±1.5 mSv; D :4.08±0.75 mSv,P<0.05) <strong><em>Conclusion: </em></strong>The results of the present study were indicative of the feasibility of IDREAMas an iterative reconstruction algorithm.http://ijmp.mums.ac.ir/article_13925_cc10cc0edbb680540b14462da7acf61f.pdfcomputed tomographyfbpidreamimage noiseimage qualityiterative algorithm snr
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Eslam Maamoun
spellingShingle Eslam Maamoun
Comparing IDREAM as an Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm against In Filtered Back Projection in Computed Tomography
Iranian Journal of Medical Physics
computed tomography
fbp
idream
image noise
image quality
iterative algorithm snr
author_facet Eslam Maamoun
author_sort Eslam Maamoun
title Comparing IDREAM as an Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm against In Filtered Back Projection in Computed Tomography
title_short Comparing IDREAM as an Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm against In Filtered Back Projection in Computed Tomography
title_full Comparing IDREAM as an Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm against In Filtered Back Projection in Computed Tomography
title_fullStr Comparing IDREAM as an Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm against In Filtered Back Projection in Computed Tomography
title_full_unstemmed Comparing IDREAM as an Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm against In Filtered Back Projection in Computed Tomography
title_sort comparing idream as an iterative reconstruction algorithm against in filtered back projection in computed tomography
publisher Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
series Iranian Journal of Medical Physics
issn 2345-3672
2345-3672
publishDate 2020-05-01
description <strong><em>Introduction:</em></strong> Recent studies of Computed Tomography (CT) conducted on patient dose reduction have recommended using an iterative reconstruction algorithm and mA (mili-Ampere) dose modulation. The current study aimed to evaluate Iterative Dose Reduction Algorithm (IDREAM) as an iterative reconstruction algorithm. <strong><em>Material and Methods:</em></strong> Two CT protocols (i.e., A: 120 KV /150 mA, FBP; B: 120KV/ (20-150) mAs, IDREAM) to scan water and acrylic phantoms. A number of 40 patients were assigned to two CT protocols (C: n=20, 120KV/160 ±10 mAs, FBP and D: n=20, 120 KV/ (30-150 mAs, IDREAM), the two groups (C and D) were then referred to abdomen and pelvis CT scan (Sinovision, insitum 16) with contrast. Image quality parameters, dose calculations were measured for all groups (i.e., A, B, C, and D). <strong><em>Results:</em></strong> Group B had a highly significant SNR with less significant noise (P<0.05), in comparison with group A. In addition, uniformity was markedly higher for group B (P<0.05) in water phantom and insignificantly different (P>0.05) in acrylic phantom, as compared to group A.  CTDIvol (A: 13.94 mGy ; B: 6.91 mGy , P<0.05  ) and   DLP (A:501.76 mGy.cm ; B :248.88 mGy.cm). Noise and SNR were significantly different (P<0.05) in group D against C. CTDIvol (C: 30.3±5.2 mGy ; D : 15.4 ±2.7 mGy, P<0.05 ) ,   DLP (C:544±100 mGy.cm; D :272.3±50.3 mGy.cm ,P<0.05) and the effective dose (C:8.1±1.5 mSv; D :4.08±0.75 mSv,P<0.05) <strong><em>Conclusion: </em></strong>The results of the present study were indicative of the feasibility of IDREAMas an iterative reconstruction algorithm.
topic computed tomography
fbp
idream
image noise
image quality
iterative algorithm snr
url http://ijmp.mums.ac.ir/article_13925_cc10cc0edbb680540b14462da7acf61f.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT eslammaamoun comparingidreamasaniterativereconstructionalgorithmagainstinfilteredbackprojectionincomputedtomography
_version_ 1724553483878662144