The Delivery of Health Promotion and Environmental Health Services; Public Health or Primary Care Settings?

The WHO Regional Office for Europe developed a set of public health functions resulting in the ten Essential Public Health Operations (EPHO). Public health or primary care settings seem to be favorable to embrace all actions included into EPHOs. The presented paper aims to guide readers on how to as...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lene Bjørn Jensen, Irena Lukic, Gabriel Gulis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-05-01
Series:Healthcare
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/6/2/42
id doaj-0c8713d05db548c28cb4bb0b74058034
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0c8713d05db548c28cb4bb0b740580342020-11-25T01:31:58ZengMDPI AGHealthcare2227-90322018-05-01624210.3390/healthcare6020042healthcare6020042The Delivery of Health Promotion and Environmental Health Services; Public Health or Primary Care Settings?Lene Bjørn Jensen0Irena Lukic1Gabriel Gulis2Public Health Consultant, Haderslev Municipality, Noerregade 41, 6100 Haderslev, DenmarkUnit for Health Promotion Research, University of Southern Denmark, 6700 Esbjerg, DenmarkUnit for Health Promotion Research, University of Southern Denmark, 6700 Esbjerg, DenmarkThe WHO Regional Office for Europe developed a set of public health functions resulting in the ten Essential Public Health Operations (EPHO). Public health or primary care settings seem to be favorable to embrace all actions included into EPHOs. The presented paper aims to guide readers on how to assign individual health promotion and environmental health services to public health or primary care settings. Survey tools were developed based on EPHO 2, 3 and 4; there were six key informant surveys out of 18 contacted completed via e-mails by informants working in Denmark on health promotion and five face-to-face interviews were conducted in Australia (Melbourne and Victoria state) with experts from environmental health, public health and a physician. Based on interviews, we developed a set of indicators to support the assignment process. Population or individual focus, a system approach or one-to-one approach, dealing with hazards or dealing with effects, being proactive or reactive were identified as main element of the decision tool. Assignment of public health services to one of two settings proved to be possible in some cases, whereas in many there is no clear distinction between the two settings. National context might be the one which guides delivery of public health services.http://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/6/2/42public health operationssettingsdecision toolsprimary care
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lene Bjørn Jensen
Irena Lukic
Gabriel Gulis
spellingShingle Lene Bjørn Jensen
Irena Lukic
Gabriel Gulis
The Delivery of Health Promotion and Environmental Health Services; Public Health or Primary Care Settings?
Healthcare
public health operations
settings
decision tools
primary care
author_facet Lene Bjørn Jensen
Irena Lukic
Gabriel Gulis
author_sort Lene Bjørn Jensen
title The Delivery of Health Promotion and Environmental Health Services; Public Health or Primary Care Settings?
title_short The Delivery of Health Promotion and Environmental Health Services; Public Health or Primary Care Settings?
title_full The Delivery of Health Promotion and Environmental Health Services; Public Health or Primary Care Settings?
title_fullStr The Delivery of Health Promotion and Environmental Health Services; Public Health or Primary Care Settings?
title_full_unstemmed The Delivery of Health Promotion and Environmental Health Services; Public Health or Primary Care Settings?
title_sort delivery of health promotion and environmental health services; public health or primary care settings?
publisher MDPI AG
series Healthcare
issn 2227-9032
publishDate 2018-05-01
description The WHO Regional Office for Europe developed a set of public health functions resulting in the ten Essential Public Health Operations (EPHO). Public health or primary care settings seem to be favorable to embrace all actions included into EPHOs. The presented paper aims to guide readers on how to assign individual health promotion and environmental health services to public health or primary care settings. Survey tools were developed based on EPHO 2, 3 and 4; there were six key informant surveys out of 18 contacted completed via e-mails by informants working in Denmark on health promotion and five face-to-face interviews were conducted in Australia (Melbourne and Victoria state) with experts from environmental health, public health and a physician. Based on interviews, we developed a set of indicators to support the assignment process. Population or individual focus, a system approach or one-to-one approach, dealing with hazards or dealing with effects, being proactive or reactive were identified as main element of the decision tool. Assignment of public health services to one of two settings proved to be possible in some cases, whereas in many there is no clear distinction between the two settings. National context might be the one which guides delivery of public health services.
topic public health operations
settings
decision tools
primary care
url http://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/6/2/42
work_keys_str_mv AT lenebjørnjensen thedeliveryofhealthpromotionandenvironmentalhealthservicespublichealthorprimarycaresettings
AT irenalukic thedeliveryofhealthpromotionandenvironmentalhealthservicespublichealthorprimarycaresettings
AT gabrielgulis thedeliveryofhealthpromotionandenvironmentalhealthservicespublichealthorprimarycaresettings
AT lenebjørnjensen deliveryofhealthpromotionandenvironmentalhealthservicespublichealthorprimarycaresettings
AT irenalukic deliveryofhealthpromotionandenvironmentalhealthservicespublichealthorprimarycaresettings
AT gabrielgulis deliveryofhealthpromotionandenvironmentalhealthservicespublichealthorprimarycaresettings
_version_ 1725084102689816576