Natural Course and Diagnosis of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: WFNS Spine Committee Recommendations
Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is defined as a degenerative disorder showing a narrowing of the spinal canal. The diagnosis is straightforward in cases with typical neurogenic claudication symptoms and unequivocal imaging findings. However, not all patients present with typical symptoms, and there is...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2020-07-01
|
Series: | World Neurosurgery: X |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590139720300041 |
id |
doaj-0c8580ad4e554eab9418ae9a82e7237b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0c8580ad4e554eab9418ae9a82e7237b2020-11-25T03:28:15ZengElsevierWorld Neurosurgery: X2590-13972020-07-017100073Natural Course and Diagnosis of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: WFNS Spine Committee RecommendationsMehmet Zileli0Marco Crostelli1Marco Grimaldi2Osvaldo Mazza3Carla Anania4Maurizio Fornari5Francesco Costa6Neurosurgery Department, Ege University, Bornova, Izmir, Turkey; To whom correspondence should be addressed: Mehmet Zileli, M.D.Spine Surgery Unit, Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù, Rome, ItalyNeuroradiology Unit, Ospedale Cristo Re, Rome, ItalySpine Surgery Unit, Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù, Rome, ItalyNeurosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Milan, ItalyNeurosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Milan, ItalyNeurosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Milan, ItalyLumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is defined as a degenerative disorder showing a narrowing of the spinal canal. The diagnosis is straightforward in cases with typical neurogenic claudication symptoms and unequivocal imaging findings. However, not all patients present with typical symptoms, and there is obviously no correlation between the severity of stenosis and clinical complaint. The radiologic diagnosis of LSS is widely discussed in the literature. The best diagnostic test for the diagnosis of LSS is magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, canal diameter measurements have not gained much consensus from radiologists, whereas qualitative measures, such as cerebrospinal fluid space obliteration, have achieved greater consensus. Instability can best be defined by standing lateral radiograms and flexion-extension radiograms. For cases showing typical neurogenic claudication symptoms and unequivocal imaging findings, the diagnosis is straightforward. However, not all patients present with typical symptoms, and there is obviously no correlation between the severity of stenosis (computed tomography and MRI) and clinical complaint. In fact, recent MRI studies have shown that mild-to-moderate stenosis can also be found in asymptomatic individuals. Routine electrophysiological tests such as lower extremity electromyography, nerve conduction studies, F-wave, and H-reflex are not helpful in the diagnosis and outcome prediction of LSS. The electrophysiological recordings are complementary to the neurologic examination and can provide confirmatory information in less obvious clinical complaints. However, in the absence of reliable evidence, imaging studies should be considered as a first-line diagnostic test in the diagnosis of degenerative LSS.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590139720300041Canal diameterCentral stenosisElectrophysiological recordingsForaminal stenosisIntraoperative neurophysiological monitoringLumbar spinal stenosis |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mehmet Zileli Marco Crostelli Marco Grimaldi Osvaldo Mazza Carla Anania Maurizio Fornari Francesco Costa |
spellingShingle |
Mehmet Zileli Marco Crostelli Marco Grimaldi Osvaldo Mazza Carla Anania Maurizio Fornari Francesco Costa Natural Course and Diagnosis of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: WFNS Spine Committee Recommendations World Neurosurgery: X Canal diameter Central stenosis Electrophysiological recordings Foraminal stenosis Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring Lumbar spinal stenosis |
author_facet |
Mehmet Zileli Marco Crostelli Marco Grimaldi Osvaldo Mazza Carla Anania Maurizio Fornari Francesco Costa |
author_sort |
Mehmet Zileli |
title |
Natural Course and Diagnosis of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: WFNS Spine Committee Recommendations |
title_short |
Natural Course and Diagnosis of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: WFNS Spine Committee Recommendations |
title_full |
Natural Course and Diagnosis of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: WFNS Spine Committee Recommendations |
title_fullStr |
Natural Course and Diagnosis of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: WFNS Spine Committee Recommendations |
title_full_unstemmed |
Natural Course and Diagnosis of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: WFNS Spine Committee Recommendations |
title_sort |
natural course and diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: wfns spine committee recommendations |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
World Neurosurgery: X |
issn |
2590-1397 |
publishDate |
2020-07-01 |
description |
Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is defined as a degenerative disorder showing a narrowing of the spinal canal. The diagnosis is straightforward in cases with typical neurogenic claudication symptoms and unequivocal imaging findings. However, not all patients present with typical symptoms, and there is obviously no correlation between the severity of stenosis and clinical complaint. The radiologic diagnosis of LSS is widely discussed in the literature. The best diagnostic test for the diagnosis of LSS is magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, canal diameter measurements have not gained much consensus from radiologists, whereas qualitative measures, such as cerebrospinal fluid space obliteration, have achieved greater consensus. Instability can best be defined by standing lateral radiograms and flexion-extension radiograms. For cases showing typical neurogenic claudication symptoms and unequivocal imaging findings, the diagnosis is straightforward. However, not all patients present with typical symptoms, and there is obviously no correlation between the severity of stenosis (computed tomography and MRI) and clinical complaint. In fact, recent MRI studies have shown that mild-to-moderate stenosis can also be found in asymptomatic individuals. Routine electrophysiological tests such as lower extremity electromyography, nerve conduction studies, F-wave, and H-reflex are not helpful in the diagnosis and outcome prediction of LSS. The electrophysiological recordings are complementary to the neurologic examination and can provide confirmatory information in less obvious clinical complaints. However, in the absence of reliable evidence, imaging studies should be considered as a first-line diagnostic test in the diagnosis of degenerative LSS. |
topic |
Canal diameter Central stenosis Electrophysiological recordings Foraminal stenosis Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring Lumbar spinal stenosis |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590139720300041 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mehmetzileli naturalcourseanddiagnosisoflumbarspinalstenosiswfnsspinecommitteerecommendations AT marcocrostelli naturalcourseanddiagnosisoflumbarspinalstenosiswfnsspinecommitteerecommendations AT marcogrimaldi naturalcourseanddiagnosisoflumbarspinalstenosiswfnsspinecommitteerecommendations AT osvaldomazza naturalcourseanddiagnosisoflumbarspinalstenosiswfnsspinecommitteerecommendations AT carlaanania naturalcourseanddiagnosisoflumbarspinalstenosiswfnsspinecommitteerecommendations AT mauriziofornari naturalcourseanddiagnosisoflumbarspinalstenosiswfnsspinecommitteerecommendations AT francescocosta naturalcourseanddiagnosisoflumbarspinalstenosiswfnsspinecommitteerecommendations |
_version_ |
1724585408387350528 |