Linking ClinicalTrials.gov and PubMed to track results of interventional human clinical trials.

In an effort to understand how results of human clinical trials are made public, we analyze a large set of clinical trials registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, the world's largest clinical trial registry.We considered two trial result artifacts: (1) existence of a trial result journal article that...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vojtech Huser, James J Cimino
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3706420?pdf=render
id doaj-0c7d1d78fb6a40b3a9cc5742c4f40a0b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0c7d1d78fb6a40b3a9cc5742c4f40a0b2020-11-25T02:47:03ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-0187e6840910.1371/journal.pone.0068409Linking ClinicalTrials.gov and PubMed to track results of interventional human clinical trials.Vojtech HuserJames J CiminoIn an effort to understand how results of human clinical trials are made public, we analyze a large set of clinical trials registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, the world's largest clinical trial registry.We considered two trial result artifacts: (1) existence of a trial result journal article that is formally linked to a registered trial or (2) the deposition of a trial's basic summary results within the registry.The study sample consisted of 8907 completed, interventional, phase 2-or-higher clinical trials that were completed in 2006-2009. The majority of trials (72.2%) had no structured trial-article link present. A total of 2367 trials (26.6%) deposited basic summary results within the registry. Of those, 969 trials (10.9%) were classified as trials with extended results and 1398 trials (15.7%) were classified as trials with only required basic results. The majority of the trials (54.8%) had no evidence of results, based on either linked result articles or basic summary results (silent trials), while a minimal number (9.2%) report results through both registry deposition and publication.Our study analyzes the body of linked knowledge around clinical trials (which we refer to as the "trialome"). Our results show that most trials do not report results and, for those that do, there is minimal overlap in the types of reporting. We identify several mechanisms by which the linkages between trials and their published results can be increased.Our study shows that even when combining publications and registry results, and despite availability of several information channels, trial sponsors do not sufficiently meet the mandate to inform the public either via a linked result publication or basic results submission.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3706420?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Vojtech Huser
James J Cimino
spellingShingle Vojtech Huser
James J Cimino
Linking ClinicalTrials.gov and PubMed to track results of interventional human clinical trials.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Vojtech Huser
James J Cimino
author_sort Vojtech Huser
title Linking ClinicalTrials.gov and PubMed to track results of interventional human clinical trials.
title_short Linking ClinicalTrials.gov and PubMed to track results of interventional human clinical trials.
title_full Linking ClinicalTrials.gov and PubMed to track results of interventional human clinical trials.
title_fullStr Linking ClinicalTrials.gov and PubMed to track results of interventional human clinical trials.
title_full_unstemmed Linking ClinicalTrials.gov and PubMed to track results of interventional human clinical trials.
title_sort linking clinicaltrials.gov and pubmed to track results of interventional human clinical trials.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2013-01-01
description In an effort to understand how results of human clinical trials are made public, we analyze a large set of clinical trials registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, the world's largest clinical trial registry.We considered two trial result artifacts: (1) existence of a trial result journal article that is formally linked to a registered trial or (2) the deposition of a trial's basic summary results within the registry.The study sample consisted of 8907 completed, interventional, phase 2-or-higher clinical trials that were completed in 2006-2009. The majority of trials (72.2%) had no structured trial-article link present. A total of 2367 trials (26.6%) deposited basic summary results within the registry. Of those, 969 trials (10.9%) were classified as trials with extended results and 1398 trials (15.7%) were classified as trials with only required basic results. The majority of the trials (54.8%) had no evidence of results, based on either linked result articles or basic summary results (silent trials), while a minimal number (9.2%) report results through both registry deposition and publication.Our study analyzes the body of linked knowledge around clinical trials (which we refer to as the "trialome"). Our results show that most trials do not report results and, for those that do, there is minimal overlap in the types of reporting. We identify several mechanisms by which the linkages between trials and their published results can be increased.Our study shows that even when combining publications and registry results, and despite availability of several information channels, trial sponsors do not sufficiently meet the mandate to inform the public either via a linked result publication or basic results submission.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3706420?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT vojtechhuser linkingclinicaltrialsgovandpubmedtotrackresultsofinterventionalhumanclinicaltrials
AT jamesjcimino linkingclinicaltrialsgovandpubmedtotrackresultsofinterventionalhumanclinicaltrials
_version_ 1724755100601155584