WRITING AND PUBLISHING AS CONVERSATION/ LA ESCRITURA Y LA PUBLICACIÓN COMO CONVERSACIÓN/ A ESCRITA E A PUBLICAÇÃO COMO CONVERSAÇÃO

This article asserts that the publishing process will be better understood as a conversational task that connects empirical precedents and theoretical debates in a given domain to produce new claims. It proposes that the lack of a conversational focus on the current academic environment and an exces...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gaea Leinhardt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad Nacional de Colombia 2012-07-01
Series:Revista Colombiana de Psicología
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/psicologia/article/viewFile/31027/31108
id doaj-0c652938c3ac446491931f00fce6fc67
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0c652938c3ac446491931f00fce6fc672020-11-24T23:28:16ZengUniversidad Nacional de ColombiaRevista Colombiana de Psicología0121-54692012-07-012111525WRITING AND PUBLISHING AS CONVERSATION/ LA ESCRITURA Y LA PUBLICACIÓN COMO CONVERSACIÓN/ A ESCRITA E A PUBLICAÇÃO COMO CONVERSAÇÃOGaea LeinhardtThis article asserts that the publishing process will be better understood as a conversational task that connects empirical precedents and theoretical debates in a given domain to produce new claims. It proposes that the lack of a conversational focus on the current academic environment and an excessive emphasis on impact indexes have created a citational inflation, in which authors and journals try to artificially increase the impact indexes without contributing to disciplinary progress. Based on current literature in psychology and conversational analysis, the article suggests that conversations are collaborative efforts that, in the case of publishing, must respond to two principles: quantity and quality. Quantity refers to making contributions as informative as possible, and quality refers to providing strong support for every claim. To explain this perspective, the author presents two case studies regarding the elaboration of seminal papers on educational psychology and education.http://www.revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/psicologia/article/viewFile/31027/31108publishingconversationbibliometricsimpact indexespublicaciónconversaciónbibliometríaíndices de impactopublicaçãoconversaçãobibliometriaíndices de impacto
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gaea Leinhardt
spellingShingle Gaea Leinhardt
WRITING AND PUBLISHING AS CONVERSATION/ LA ESCRITURA Y LA PUBLICACIÓN COMO CONVERSACIÓN/ A ESCRITA E A PUBLICAÇÃO COMO CONVERSAÇÃO
Revista Colombiana de Psicología
publishing
conversation
bibliometrics
impact indexes
publicación
conversación
bibliometría
índices de impacto
publicação
conversação
bibliometria
índices de impacto
author_facet Gaea Leinhardt
author_sort Gaea Leinhardt
title WRITING AND PUBLISHING AS CONVERSATION/ LA ESCRITURA Y LA PUBLICACIÓN COMO CONVERSACIÓN/ A ESCRITA E A PUBLICAÇÃO COMO CONVERSAÇÃO
title_short WRITING AND PUBLISHING AS CONVERSATION/ LA ESCRITURA Y LA PUBLICACIÓN COMO CONVERSACIÓN/ A ESCRITA E A PUBLICAÇÃO COMO CONVERSAÇÃO
title_full WRITING AND PUBLISHING AS CONVERSATION/ LA ESCRITURA Y LA PUBLICACIÓN COMO CONVERSACIÓN/ A ESCRITA E A PUBLICAÇÃO COMO CONVERSAÇÃO
title_fullStr WRITING AND PUBLISHING AS CONVERSATION/ LA ESCRITURA Y LA PUBLICACIÓN COMO CONVERSACIÓN/ A ESCRITA E A PUBLICAÇÃO COMO CONVERSAÇÃO
title_full_unstemmed WRITING AND PUBLISHING AS CONVERSATION/ LA ESCRITURA Y LA PUBLICACIÓN COMO CONVERSACIÓN/ A ESCRITA E A PUBLICAÇÃO COMO CONVERSAÇÃO
title_sort writing and publishing as conversation/ la escritura y la publicación como conversación/ a escrita e a publicação como conversação
publisher Universidad Nacional de Colombia
series Revista Colombiana de Psicología
issn 0121-5469
publishDate 2012-07-01
description This article asserts that the publishing process will be better understood as a conversational task that connects empirical precedents and theoretical debates in a given domain to produce new claims. It proposes that the lack of a conversational focus on the current academic environment and an excessive emphasis on impact indexes have created a citational inflation, in which authors and journals try to artificially increase the impact indexes without contributing to disciplinary progress. Based on current literature in psychology and conversational analysis, the article suggests that conversations are collaborative efforts that, in the case of publishing, must respond to two principles: quantity and quality. Quantity refers to making contributions as informative as possible, and quality refers to providing strong support for every claim. To explain this perspective, the author presents two case studies regarding the elaboration of seminal papers on educational psychology and education.
topic publishing
conversation
bibliometrics
impact indexes
publicación
conversación
bibliometría
índices de impacto
publicação
conversação
bibliometria
índices de impacto
url http://www.revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/psicologia/article/viewFile/31027/31108
work_keys_str_mv AT gaealeinhardt writingandpublishingasconversationlaescrituraylapublicacioncomoconversacionaescritaeapublicacaocomoconversacao
_version_ 1725550092735217664