Review of soft tissue augmentation in the face

James NewmanFacial Plastic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CAFacial Plastic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA, USAAbstract: A primary pillar of facial rejuvenation is the replacement of soft tissue atrophy via a variety of augmentation techniques. The...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: James Newman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2009-08-01
Series:Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
Online Access:http://www.dovepress.com/review-of-soft-tissue-augmentation-in-the-face-a3489
id doaj-0c515fad1c4846b2b9bf01035ee20cbb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0c515fad1c4846b2b9bf01035ee20cbb2020-11-24T22:51:35ZengDove Medical PressClinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology1178-70152009-08-012009default141150Review of soft tissue augmentation in the faceJames NewmanJames NewmanFacial Plastic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CAFacial Plastic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA, USAAbstract: A primary pillar of facial rejuvenation is the replacement of soft tissue atrophy via a variety of augmentation techniques. The techniques can be classified into three categories, skeletal onlay grafts, subcutaneous volumizers, and dermal fillers. While onlay grafts and subcutaneous volumizers have the most persistent results, the emergence of improved dermal fillers in the past 5 years has become increasingly popular. An accurate diagnosis of the level(s) of soft tissue atrophy in the face needs to be made prior to selection of the category or combination of techniques. In the younger patient, the selection of a dermal filler or combination of fillers can be adequate for treatment. A comparison of the composition and characteristics of the available dermal fillers are discussed in detail to assist the clinician in understanding the actual mechanism of soft tissue augmentation. In the more advanced aging face, a combination of the three categories may be necessary to produce optimal results. Just as dermal fillers have become more differentiated to increase their longevity, the non-injectible long-lasting implants are becoming more developed to mimic accurate viscoelastic properties of the facial soft tissues. All three classes of augmentation techniques can provide patients with very satisfactory results as part of overall facial rejuvenation.Keywords: soft tissue, dermal fillers, facial implants, facial augmentation http://www.dovepress.com/review-of-soft-tissue-augmentation-in-the-face-a3489
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author James Newman
spellingShingle James Newman
Review of soft tissue augmentation in the face
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
author_facet James Newman
author_sort James Newman
title Review of soft tissue augmentation in the face
title_short Review of soft tissue augmentation in the face
title_full Review of soft tissue augmentation in the face
title_fullStr Review of soft tissue augmentation in the face
title_full_unstemmed Review of soft tissue augmentation in the face
title_sort review of soft tissue augmentation in the face
publisher Dove Medical Press
series Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
issn 1178-7015
publishDate 2009-08-01
description James NewmanFacial Plastic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CAFacial Plastic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA, USAAbstract: A primary pillar of facial rejuvenation is the replacement of soft tissue atrophy via a variety of augmentation techniques. The techniques can be classified into three categories, skeletal onlay grafts, subcutaneous volumizers, and dermal fillers. While onlay grafts and subcutaneous volumizers have the most persistent results, the emergence of improved dermal fillers in the past 5 years has become increasingly popular. An accurate diagnosis of the level(s) of soft tissue atrophy in the face needs to be made prior to selection of the category or combination of techniques. In the younger patient, the selection of a dermal filler or combination of fillers can be adequate for treatment. A comparison of the composition and characteristics of the available dermal fillers are discussed in detail to assist the clinician in understanding the actual mechanism of soft tissue augmentation. In the more advanced aging face, a combination of the three categories may be necessary to produce optimal results. Just as dermal fillers have become more differentiated to increase their longevity, the non-injectible long-lasting implants are becoming more developed to mimic accurate viscoelastic properties of the facial soft tissues. All three classes of augmentation techniques can provide patients with very satisfactory results as part of overall facial rejuvenation.Keywords: soft tissue, dermal fillers, facial implants, facial augmentation
url http://www.dovepress.com/review-of-soft-tissue-augmentation-in-the-face-a3489
work_keys_str_mv AT jamesnewman reviewofsofttissueaugmentationintheface
_version_ 1725668974470889472