Effect of Gong’s Mobilisation versus Muscle Energy Technique on Pain and Functional Ability of Shoulder in Phase II Adhesive Capsulitis

Introduction: Adhesive capsulitis is a self-limiting condition of unknown aetiology. It is characterised by painful and limited active and passive range of motion. Women are more commonly affected than men. This condition is defined as spontaneous onset of pain and limitation of shoulder range of mo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yuvarani Gopinath, Santhosh Krithika Seenivasan, Senthil Nathan Celambakkaam Veeraraghavan, Rajalaxmi Viswanathan, Mohan Kumar Govindaraj
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited 2018-09-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/12021/34725_CE[RA1]_F(SHU)_PF1(AJ_AP)_PN(AP).pdf
id doaj-0c44c29bc36748bb87e59b5ff6b190b0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0c44c29bc36748bb87e59b5ff6b190b02020-11-25T02:38:12ZengJCDR Research and Publications Private LimitedJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research2249-782X0973-709X2018-09-01129YC05YC0810.7860/JCDR/2018/34725.12021Effect of Gong’s Mobilisation versus Muscle Energy Technique on Pain and Functional Ability of Shoulder in Phase II Adhesive CapsulitisYuvarani Gopinath0Santhosh Krithika Seenivasan1Senthil Nathan Celambakkaam Veeraraghavan2Rajalaxmi Viswanathan3Mohan Kumar Govindaraj4Assistant Professor, Department of Physiotherapy, Dr.MGR Educational and Research Institute University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.Faculty of Physiotherapy, Department of Physiotherapy, Dr.MGR Educational and Research Institute University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.Principal, Department of Physiotherapy, Dr.MGR Educational and Research Institute University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.Vice Principal, Department of Physiotherapy, Dr.MGR Educational and Research Institute University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.Professor, Department of Physiotherapy, Dr.MGR Educational and Research Institute University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.Introduction: Adhesive capsulitis is a self-limiting condition of unknown aetiology. It is characterised by painful and limited active and passive range of motion. Women are more commonly affected than men. This condition is defined as spontaneous onset of pain and limitation of shoulder range of motion. Manipulation, soft tissue mobilisation techniques, electrotherapy have proved effective in reducing pain, improving the range of motion, thereby increasing the functional ability of shoulder. Aim: The present study focuses on the effectiveness of Gong’s mobilisation versus muscle energy technique on pain and functional ability of shoulder in phase II adhesive capsulitis. Materials and Methods: The present cross-sectional study included 50 subjects with the history of adhesive capsulitis (phase II) selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. They were randomly allocated into two study groups. The duration of the treatment intervention was 6 sessions per week for the duration of two weeks. The Gong’s mobilisation (Group A) pull was maintained for about 10-15 seconds and a rest period of 5 seconds was given. This technique was performed for about 2-3 minutes. Maitland’s grade 3 and 4 was performed to increase the range which was then followed by sustained stretch at grade 4 for about 5-7 seconds. Muscle energy technique was applied for 5 repetitions per set, 5 sets per session, 1 session per day, 5 days a week for 2 weeks with each repetition maintained for the duration of 7–10 seconds. The outcome measures for the range of motion was goniometer, pain was assessed by using VAS, functional ability by Shoulder Pain And Disability Index (SPADI), after six sessions of treatment for about two weeks. Results: The post-test mean value of range of motion for Group A was 155.56 and for Group B it was 135.40. The mean post test value for VAS for Group A was 2.12 and Group B it was 3.24. The post mean value for SPADI in Group A was 25.28 and Group B 34.80. Based on the above data analysis it is evident that Group A showed significant improvement than Group B. This implies that Gong’s mobilisation is more beneficial in improving ROM, reducing pain, improving functional ability. Conclusion: The present study concludes that Gong’s mobilisation is more effective than muscle energy technique in subjects with phase II adhesive capsulitis.https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/12021/34725_CE[RA1]_F(SHU)_PF1(AJ_AP)_PN(AP).pdfrange of motionshoulder pain and disability indexvisual analog scale
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yuvarani Gopinath
Santhosh Krithika Seenivasan
Senthil Nathan Celambakkaam Veeraraghavan
Rajalaxmi Viswanathan
Mohan Kumar Govindaraj
spellingShingle Yuvarani Gopinath
Santhosh Krithika Seenivasan
Senthil Nathan Celambakkaam Veeraraghavan
Rajalaxmi Viswanathan
Mohan Kumar Govindaraj
Effect of Gong’s Mobilisation versus Muscle Energy Technique on Pain and Functional Ability of Shoulder in Phase II Adhesive Capsulitis
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
range of motion
shoulder pain and disability index
visual analog scale
author_facet Yuvarani Gopinath
Santhosh Krithika Seenivasan
Senthil Nathan Celambakkaam Veeraraghavan
Rajalaxmi Viswanathan
Mohan Kumar Govindaraj
author_sort Yuvarani Gopinath
title Effect of Gong’s Mobilisation versus Muscle Energy Technique on Pain and Functional Ability of Shoulder in Phase II Adhesive Capsulitis
title_short Effect of Gong’s Mobilisation versus Muscle Energy Technique on Pain and Functional Ability of Shoulder in Phase II Adhesive Capsulitis
title_full Effect of Gong’s Mobilisation versus Muscle Energy Technique on Pain and Functional Ability of Shoulder in Phase II Adhesive Capsulitis
title_fullStr Effect of Gong’s Mobilisation versus Muscle Energy Technique on Pain and Functional Ability of Shoulder in Phase II Adhesive Capsulitis
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Gong’s Mobilisation versus Muscle Energy Technique on Pain and Functional Ability of Shoulder in Phase II Adhesive Capsulitis
title_sort effect of gong’s mobilisation versus muscle energy technique on pain and functional ability of shoulder in phase ii adhesive capsulitis
publisher JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
series Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
issn 2249-782X
0973-709X
publishDate 2018-09-01
description Introduction: Adhesive capsulitis is a self-limiting condition of unknown aetiology. It is characterised by painful and limited active and passive range of motion. Women are more commonly affected than men. This condition is defined as spontaneous onset of pain and limitation of shoulder range of motion. Manipulation, soft tissue mobilisation techniques, electrotherapy have proved effective in reducing pain, improving the range of motion, thereby increasing the functional ability of shoulder. Aim: The present study focuses on the effectiveness of Gong’s mobilisation versus muscle energy technique on pain and functional ability of shoulder in phase II adhesive capsulitis. Materials and Methods: The present cross-sectional study included 50 subjects with the history of adhesive capsulitis (phase II) selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. They were randomly allocated into two study groups. The duration of the treatment intervention was 6 sessions per week for the duration of two weeks. The Gong’s mobilisation (Group A) pull was maintained for about 10-15 seconds and a rest period of 5 seconds was given. This technique was performed for about 2-3 minutes. Maitland’s grade 3 and 4 was performed to increase the range which was then followed by sustained stretch at grade 4 for about 5-7 seconds. Muscle energy technique was applied for 5 repetitions per set, 5 sets per session, 1 session per day, 5 days a week for 2 weeks with each repetition maintained for the duration of 7–10 seconds. The outcome measures for the range of motion was goniometer, pain was assessed by using VAS, functional ability by Shoulder Pain And Disability Index (SPADI), after six sessions of treatment for about two weeks. Results: The post-test mean value of range of motion for Group A was 155.56 and for Group B it was 135.40. The mean post test value for VAS for Group A was 2.12 and Group B it was 3.24. The post mean value for SPADI in Group A was 25.28 and Group B 34.80. Based on the above data analysis it is evident that Group A showed significant improvement than Group B. This implies that Gong’s mobilisation is more beneficial in improving ROM, reducing pain, improving functional ability. Conclusion: The present study concludes that Gong’s mobilisation is more effective than muscle energy technique in subjects with phase II adhesive capsulitis.
topic range of motion
shoulder pain and disability index
visual analog scale
url https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/12021/34725_CE[RA1]_F(SHU)_PF1(AJ_AP)_PN(AP).pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT yuvaranigopinath effectofgongsmobilisationversusmuscleenergytechniqueonpainandfunctionalabilityofshoulderinphaseiiadhesivecapsulitis
AT santhoshkrithikaseenivasan effectofgongsmobilisationversusmuscleenergytechniqueonpainandfunctionalabilityofshoulderinphaseiiadhesivecapsulitis
AT senthilnathancelambakkaamveeraraghavan effectofgongsmobilisationversusmuscleenergytechniqueonpainandfunctionalabilityofshoulderinphaseiiadhesivecapsulitis
AT rajalaxmiviswanathan effectofgongsmobilisationversusmuscleenergytechniqueonpainandfunctionalabilityofshoulderinphaseiiadhesivecapsulitis
AT mohankumargovindaraj effectofgongsmobilisationversusmuscleenergytechniqueonpainandfunctionalabilityofshoulderinphaseiiadhesivecapsulitis
_version_ 1724792216668340224