A population-based study of the effectiveness of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus conventional fractionated radiotherapy for clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer patients

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is a promising option for non-operated early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared to conventional fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT). However, results from conclusive randomized controlled trials are not yet available. The aim of our study was to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tu Chih-Yen, Hsia Te-Chun, Fang Hsin-Yuan, Liang Ji-An, Yang Su-Tso, Li Chia-Chin, Chien Chun-Ru
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2017-12-01
Series:Radiology and Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/raon-2017-0058
Description
Summary:Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is a promising option for non-operated early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared to conventional fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT). However, results from conclusive randomized controlled trials are not yet available. The aim of our study was to explore the effectiveness of SABR vs. CFRT for non-operated early-stage NSCLC.
ISSN:1581-3207