A retrospective report (2003–2013) of the complications associated with the use of a one-man (head and tail) rope recovery system in horses following general anaesthesia
Abstract Background The mortality rate of horses undergoing general anaesthesia is high when compared to humans or small animal patients. One of the most critical periods during equine anaesthesia is recovery, as the horse attempts to regain a standing position. This study was performed in a private...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2018-02-01
|
Series: | Irish Veterinary Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13620-018-0117-1 |
id |
doaj-0c2aef94778f42c4b279eb8ea80a72f3 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0c2aef94778f42c4b279eb8ea80a72f32020-11-24T21:34:26ZengBMCIrish Veterinary Journal2046-04812018-02-017111910.1186/s13620-018-0117-1A retrospective report (2003–2013) of the complications associated with the use of a one-man (head and tail) rope recovery system in horses following general anaesthesiaMaria Chie Niimura del Barrio0Florent David1J. M. Lynne Hughes2David Clifford3Hans Wilderjans4Rachel Bennett5UCD Veterinary Hospital, University College DublinEquine Veterinary Medical Center, Al Shaqab- a member of Qatar FoundationUCD Veterinary Hospital, University College DublinUCD Veterinary Hospital, University College DublinDierenkliniek De BosdreefThe Granary, Bunstead BarnsAbstract Background The mortality rate of horses undergoing general anaesthesia is high when compared to humans or small animal patients. One of the most critical periods during equine anaesthesia is recovery, as the horse attempts to regain a standing position. This study was performed in a private equine practice in Belgium that uses a purpose-designed one-man (head and tail) rope recovery system to assist the horse during the standing process. The main purpose of the retrospective study was to report and analyse complications and the mortality rate in horses during recovery from anaesthesia using the described recovery system. Information retrieved from the medical records included patient signalment, anaesthetic protocol, duration of anaesthesia, ASA grade, type of surgery, recovery time and complications during recovery. Sedation was administered to all horses prior to recovery with the rope system. Complications were divided into major complications in which the horse was euthanized and minor complications where the horse survived. Major complications were further subdivided into those where the rope system did not contribute to the recovery complication (Group 1) and those where it was not possible to determine if the rope system was of any benefit (Group 2). Results Five thousand eight hundred fifty two horses recovered from general anaesthesia with rope assistance. Complications were identified in 30 (0.51%). Major complications occurred in 12 horses (0.20%) of which three (0.05%) were assigned to Group 1 and nine (0.15%) to Group 2. Three horses in Group 2 suffered musculoskeletal injuries (0.05%). Eighteen horses (0.31%) suffered minor complications, of which five (0.08%) were categorised as failures of the recovery system. Conclusions This study reports the major and minor complication and mortality rate during recovery from anaesthesia using a specific type of rope recovery system. Mortality associated with the rope recovery system was low. During recovery from anaesthesia this rope system may reduce the risk of lethal complications, particularly major orthopaedic injuries.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13620-018-0117-1AnaesthesiaRope-assisted recoveryComplicationsEquineMortality |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Maria Chie Niimura del Barrio Florent David J. M. Lynne Hughes David Clifford Hans Wilderjans Rachel Bennett |
spellingShingle |
Maria Chie Niimura del Barrio Florent David J. M. Lynne Hughes David Clifford Hans Wilderjans Rachel Bennett A retrospective report (2003–2013) of the complications associated with the use of a one-man (head and tail) rope recovery system in horses following general anaesthesia Irish Veterinary Journal Anaesthesia Rope-assisted recovery Complications Equine Mortality |
author_facet |
Maria Chie Niimura del Barrio Florent David J. M. Lynne Hughes David Clifford Hans Wilderjans Rachel Bennett |
author_sort |
Maria Chie Niimura del Barrio |
title |
A retrospective report (2003–2013) of the complications associated with the use of a one-man (head and tail) rope recovery system in horses following general anaesthesia |
title_short |
A retrospective report (2003–2013) of the complications associated with the use of a one-man (head and tail) rope recovery system in horses following general anaesthesia |
title_full |
A retrospective report (2003–2013) of the complications associated with the use of a one-man (head and tail) rope recovery system in horses following general anaesthesia |
title_fullStr |
A retrospective report (2003–2013) of the complications associated with the use of a one-man (head and tail) rope recovery system in horses following general anaesthesia |
title_full_unstemmed |
A retrospective report (2003–2013) of the complications associated with the use of a one-man (head and tail) rope recovery system in horses following general anaesthesia |
title_sort |
retrospective report (2003–2013) of the complications associated with the use of a one-man (head and tail) rope recovery system in horses following general anaesthesia |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Irish Veterinary Journal |
issn |
2046-0481 |
publishDate |
2018-02-01 |
description |
Abstract Background The mortality rate of horses undergoing general anaesthesia is high when compared to humans or small animal patients. One of the most critical periods during equine anaesthesia is recovery, as the horse attempts to regain a standing position. This study was performed in a private equine practice in Belgium that uses a purpose-designed one-man (head and tail) rope recovery system to assist the horse during the standing process. The main purpose of the retrospective study was to report and analyse complications and the mortality rate in horses during recovery from anaesthesia using the described recovery system. Information retrieved from the medical records included patient signalment, anaesthetic protocol, duration of anaesthesia, ASA grade, type of surgery, recovery time and complications during recovery. Sedation was administered to all horses prior to recovery with the rope system. Complications were divided into major complications in which the horse was euthanized and minor complications where the horse survived. Major complications were further subdivided into those where the rope system did not contribute to the recovery complication (Group 1) and those where it was not possible to determine if the rope system was of any benefit (Group 2). Results Five thousand eight hundred fifty two horses recovered from general anaesthesia with rope assistance. Complications were identified in 30 (0.51%). Major complications occurred in 12 horses (0.20%) of which three (0.05%) were assigned to Group 1 and nine (0.15%) to Group 2. Three horses in Group 2 suffered musculoskeletal injuries (0.05%). Eighteen horses (0.31%) suffered minor complications, of which five (0.08%) were categorised as failures of the recovery system. Conclusions This study reports the major and minor complication and mortality rate during recovery from anaesthesia using a specific type of rope recovery system. Mortality associated with the rope recovery system was low. During recovery from anaesthesia this rope system may reduce the risk of lethal complications, particularly major orthopaedic injuries. |
topic |
Anaesthesia Rope-assisted recovery Complications Equine Mortality |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13620-018-0117-1 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mariachieniimuradelbarrio aretrospectivereport20032013ofthecomplicationsassociatedwiththeuseofaonemanheadandtailroperecoverysysteminhorsesfollowinggeneralanaesthesia AT florentdavid aretrospectivereport20032013ofthecomplicationsassociatedwiththeuseofaonemanheadandtailroperecoverysysteminhorsesfollowinggeneralanaesthesia AT jmlynnehughes aretrospectivereport20032013ofthecomplicationsassociatedwiththeuseofaonemanheadandtailroperecoverysysteminhorsesfollowinggeneralanaesthesia AT davidclifford aretrospectivereport20032013ofthecomplicationsassociatedwiththeuseofaonemanheadandtailroperecoverysysteminhorsesfollowinggeneralanaesthesia AT hanswilderjans aretrospectivereport20032013ofthecomplicationsassociatedwiththeuseofaonemanheadandtailroperecoverysysteminhorsesfollowinggeneralanaesthesia AT rachelbennett aretrospectivereport20032013ofthecomplicationsassociatedwiththeuseofaonemanheadandtailroperecoverysysteminhorsesfollowinggeneralanaesthesia AT mariachieniimuradelbarrio retrospectivereport20032013ofthecomplicationsassociatedwiththeuseofaonemanheadandtailroperecoverysysteminhorsesfollowinggeneralanaesthesia AT florentdavid retrospectivereport20032013ofthecomplicationsassociatedwiththeuseofaonemanheadandtailroperecoverysysteminhorsesfollowinggeneralanaesthesia AT jmlynnehughes retrospectivereport20032013ofthecomplicationsassociatedwiththeuseofaonemanheadandtailroperecoverysysteminhorsesfollowinggeneralanaesthesia AT davidclifford retrospectivereport20032013ofthecomplicationsassociatedwiththeuseofaonemanheadandtailroperecoverysysteminhorsesfollowinggeneralanaesthesia AT hanswilderjans retrospectivereport20032013ofthecomplicationsassociatedwiththeuseofaonemanheadandtailroperecoverysysteminhorsesfollowinggeneralanaesthesia AT rachelbennett retrospectivereport20032013ofthecomplicationsassociatedwiththeuseofaonemanheadandtailroperecoverysysteminhorsesfollowinggeneralanaesthesia |
_version_ |
1725949529168019456 |