A retrospective report (2003–2013) of the complications associated with the use of a one-man (head and tail) rope recovery system in horses following general anaesthesia

Abstract Background The mortality rate of horses undergoing general anaesthesia is high when compared to humans or small animal patients. One of the most critical periods during equine anaesthesia is recovery, as the horse attempts to regain a standing position. This study was performed in a private...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maria Chie Niimura del Barrio, Florent David, J. M. Lynne Hughes, David Clifford, Hans Wilderjans, Rachel Bennett
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-02-01
Series:Irish Veterinary Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13620-018-0117-1
id doaj-0c2aef94778f42c4b279eb8ea80a72f3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0c2aef94778f42c4b279eb8ea80a72f32020-11-24T21:34:26ZengBMCIrish Veterinary Journal2046-04812018-02-017111910.1186/s13620-018-0117-1A retrospective report (2003–2013) of the complications associated with the use of a one-man (head and tail) rope recovery system in horses following general anaesthesiaMaria Chie Niimura del Barrio0Florent David1J. M. Lynne Hughes2David Clifford3Hans Wilderjans4Rachel Bennett5UCD Veterinary Hospital, University College DublinEquine Veterinary Medical Center, Al Shaqab- a member of Qatar FoundationUCD Veterinary Hospital, University College DublinUCD Veterinary Hospital, University College DublinDierenkliniek De BosdreefThe Granary, Bunstead BarnsAbstract Background The mortality rate of horses undergoing general anaesthesia is high when compared to humans or small animal patients. One of the most critical periods during equine anaesthesia is recovery, as the horse attempts to regain a standing position. This study was performed in a private equine practice in Belgium that uses a purpose-designed one-man (head and tail) rope recovery system to assist the horse during the standing process. The main purpose of the retrospective study was to report and analyse complications and the mortality rate in horses during recovery from anaesthesia using the described recovery system. Information retrieved from the medical records included patient signalment, anaesthetic protocol, duration of anaesthesia, ASA grade, type of surgery, recovery time and complications during recovery. Sedation was administered to all horses prior to recovery with the rope system. Complications were divided into major complications in which the horse was euthanized and minor complications where the horse survived. Major complications were further subdivided into those where the rope system did not contribute to the recovery complication (Group 1) and those where it was not possible to determine if the rope system was of any benefit (Group 2). Results Five thousand eight hundred fifty two horses recovered from general anaesthesia with rope assistance. Complications were identified in 30 (0.51%). Major complications occurred in 12 horses (0.20%) of which three (0.05%) were assigned to Group 1 and nine (0.15%) to Group 2. Three horses in Group 2 suffered musculoskeletal injuries (0.05%). Eighteen horses (0.31%) suffered minor complications, of which five (0.08%) were categorised as failures of the recovery system. Conclusions This study reports the major and minor complication and mortality rate during recovery from anaesthesia using a specific type of rope recovery system. Mortality associated with the rope recovery system was low. During recovery from anaesthesia this rope system may reduce the risk of lethal complications, particularly major orthopaedic injuries.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13620-018-0117-1AnaesthesiaRope-assisted recoveryComplicationsEquineMortality
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Maria Chie Niimura del Barrio
Florent David
J. M. Lynne Hughes
David Clifford
Hans Wilderjans
Rachel Bennett
spellingShingle Maria Chie Niimura del Barrio
Florent David
J. M. Lynne Hughes
David Clifford
Hans Wilderjans
Rachel Bennett
A retrospective report (2003–2013) of the complications associated with the use of a one-man (head and tail) rope recovery system in horses following general anaesthesia
Irish Veterinary Journal
Anaesthesia
Rope-assisted recovery
Complications
Equine
Mortality
author_facet Maria Chie Niimura del Barrio
Florent David
J. M. Lynne Hughes
David Clifford
Hans Wilderjans
Rachel Bennett
author_sort Maria Chie Niimura del Barrio
title A retrospective report (2003–2013) of the complications associated with the use of a one-man (head and tail) rope recovery system in horses following general anaesthesia
title_short A retrospective report (2003–2013) of the complications associated with the use of a one-man (head and tail) rope recovery system in horses following general anaesthesia
title_full A retrospective report (2003–2013) of the complications associated with the use of a one-man (head and tail) rope recovery system in horses following general anaesthesia
title_fullStr A retrospective report (2003–2013) of the complications associated with the use of a one-man (head and tail) rope recovery system in horses following general anaesthesia
title_full_unstemmed A retrospective report (2003–2013) of the complications associated with the use of a one-man (head and tail) rope recovery system in horses following general anaesthesia
title_sort retrospective report (2003–2013) of the complications associated with the use of a one-man (head and tail) rope recovery system in horses following general anaesthesia
publisher BMC
series Irish Veterinary Journal
issn 2046-0481
publishDate 2018-02-01
description Abstract Background The mortality rate of horses undergoing general anaesthesia is high when compared to humans or small animal patients. One of the most critical periods during equine anaesthesia is recovery, as the horse attempts to regain a standing position. This study was performed in a private equine practice in Belgium that uses a purpose-designed one-man (head and tail) rope recovery system to assist the horse during the standing process. The main purpose of the retrospective study was to report and analyse complications and the mortality rate in horses during recovery from anaesthesia using the described recovery system. Information retrieved from the medical records included patient signalment, anaesthetic protocol, duration of anaesthesia, ASA grade, type of surgery, recovery time and complications during recovery. Sedation was administered to all horses prior to recovery with the rope system. Complications were divided into major complications in which the horse was euthanized and minor complications where the horse survived. Major complications were further subdivided into those where the rope system did not contribute to the recovery complication (Group 1) and those where it was not possible to determine if the rope system was of any benefit (Group 2). Results Five thousand eight hundred fifty two horses recovered from general anaesthesia with rope assistance. Complications were identified in 30 (0.51%). Major complications occurred in 12 horses (0.20%) of which three (0.05%) were assigned to Group 1 and nine (0.15%) to Group 2. Three horses in Group 2 suffered musculoskeletal injuries (0.05%). Eighteen horses (0.31%) suffered minor complications, of which five (0.08%) were categorised as failures of the recovery system. Conclusions This study reports the major and minor complication and mortality rate during recovery from anaesthesia using a specific type of rope recovery system. Mortality associated with the rope recovery system was low. During recovery from anaesthesia this rope system may reduce the risk of lethal complications, particularly major orthopaedic injuries.
topic Anaesthesia
Rope-assisted recovery
Complications
Equine
Mortality
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13620-018-0117-1
work_keys_str_mv AT mariachieniimuradelbarrio aretrospectivereport20032013ofthecomplicationsassociatedwiththeuseofaonemanheadandtailroperecoverysysteminhorsesfollowinggeneralanaesthesia
AT florentdavid aretrospectivereport20032013ofthecomplicationsassociatedwiththeuseofaonemanheadandtailroperecoverysysteminhorsesfollowinggeneralanaesthesia
AT jmlynnehughes aretrospectivereport20032013ofthecomplicationsassociatedwiththeuseofaonemanheadandtailroperecoverysysteminhorsesfollowinggeneralanaesthesia
AT davidclifford aretrospectivereport20032013ofthecomplicationsassociatedwiththeuseofaonemanheadandtailroperecoverysysteminhorsesfollowinggeneralanaesthesia
AT hanswilderjans aretrospectivereport20032013ofthecomplicationsassociatedwiththeuseofaonemanheadandtailroperecoverysysteminhorsesfollowinggeneralanaesthesia
AT rachelbennett aretrospectivereport20032013ofthecomplicationsassociatedwiththeuseofaonemanheadandtailroperecoverysysteminhorsesfollowinggeneralanaesthesia
AT mariachieniimuradelbarrio retrospectivereport20032013ofthecomplicationsassociatedwiththeuseofaonemanheadandtailroperecoverysysteminhorsesfollowinggeneralanaesthesia
AT florentdavid retrospectivereport20032013ofthecomplicationsassociatedwiththeuseofaonemanheadandtailroperecoverysysteminhorsesfollowinggeneralanaesthesia
AT jmlynnehughes retrospectivereport20032013ofthecomplicationsassociatedwiththeuseofaonemanheadandtailroperecoverysysteminhorsesfollowinggeneralanaesthesia
AT davidclifford retrospectivereport20032013ofthecomplicationsassociatedwiththeuseofaonemanheadandtailroperecoverysysteminhorsesfollowinggeneralanaesthesia
AT hanswilderjans retrospectivereport20032013ofthecomplicationsassociatedwiththeuseofaonemanheadandtailroperecoverysysteminhorsesfollowinggeneralanaesthesia
AT rachelbennett retrospectivereport20032013ofthecomplicationsassociatedwiththeuseofaonemanheadandtailroperecoverysysteminhorsesfollowinggeneralanaesthesia
_version_ 1725949529168019456