The Origins of Scientific Evidence: Salvatore Ottolenghi’s Police School

The essay deals with the steps that led to the birth of the Scientific Police School (Higher School from 1925), thanks to the work of Salvatore Ottolenghi. The School was founded in 1902 in Rome and aimed to teach both police and investigative police officers a scientific method to best perform thei...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Loredana Garlati
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal 2021-08-01
Series:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ibraspp.com.br/revista/index.php/RBDPP/article/view/597
id doaj-0c2a76fc0c144c64b9f3f3ab13af9179
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0c2a76fc0c144c64b9f3f3ab13af91792021-08-29T22:07:21ZspaInstituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual PenalRevista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal2525-510X2021-08-017210.22197/rbdpp.v7i2.597238The Origins of Scientific Evidence: Salvatore Ottolenghi’s Police SchoolLoredana Garlati0Università degli Studi Milano BicoccaThe essay deals with the steps that led to the birth of the Scientific Police School (Higher School from 1925), thanks to the work of Salvatore Ottolenghi. The School was founded in 1902 in Rome and aimed to teach both police and investigative police officers a scientific method to best perform their tasks: in the former case, the prevention of crimes; in the latter one, providing the judiciary with “objective” data in order to ascertain the procedural truth. The survey gives the chance to focus on a culturally lively period, in which the fideistic enthusiasm towards the so-called auxiliary sciences (anthropology, psychology, forensic medicine, statistics, and so forth) came on the scene of criminal trials, also thanks to the boost given by the Positive School. Particular attention was paid to anthropometry, developed by Bertillon, and dactyloscopy, also thanks to the studies of the Italian Gasti. It was the dawn of the so-called scientific proof, which raised questions – asked even today – about the role of the judge; the legitimacy of practices accused to be invasive and to violate personal rights; the relationship between science and law and between scientific proof and discretionary power (or intime conviction) of the judge.http://www.ibraspp.com.br/revista/index.php/RBDPP/article/view/597scuola di polizia scientificaottolenghi, salvatoreantropometriadattiloscopia.
collection DOAJ
language Spanish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Loredana Garlati
spellingShingle Loredana Garlati
The Origins of Scientific Evidence: Salvatore Ottolenghi’s Police School
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal
scuola di polizia scientifica
ottolenghi, salvatore
antropometria
dattiloscopia.
author_facet Loredana Garlati
author_sort Loredana Garlati
title The Origins of Scientific Evidence: Salvatore Ottolenghi’s Police School
title_short The Origins of Scientific Evidence: Salvatore Ottolenghi’s Police School
title_full The Origins of Scientific Evidence: Salvatore Ottolenghi’s Police School
title_fullStr The Origins of Scientific Evidence: Salvatore Ottolenghi’s Police School
title_full_unstemmed The Origins of Scientific Evidence: Salvatore Ottolenghi’s Police School
title_sort origins of scientific evidence: salvatore ottolenghi’s police school
publisher Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal
series Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal
issn 2525-510X
publishDate 2021-08-01
description The essay deals with the steps that led to the birth of the Scientific Police School (Higher School from 1925), thanks to the work of Salvatore Ottolenghi. The School was founded in 1902 in Rome and aimed to teach both police and investigative police officers a scientific method to best perform their tasks: in the former case, the prevention of crimes; in the latter one, providing the judiciary with “objective” data in order to ascertain the procedural truth. The survey gives the chance to focus on a culturally lively period, in which the fideistic enthusiasm towards the so-called auxiliary sciences (anthropology, psychology, forensic medicine, statistics, and so forth) came on the scene of criminal trials, also thanks to the boost given by the Positive School. Particular attention was paid to anthropometry, developed by Bertillon, and dactyloscopy, also thanks to the studies of the Italian Gasti. It was the dawn of the so-called scientific proof, which raised questions – asked even today – about the role of the judge; the legitimacy of practices accused to be invasive and to violate personal rights; the relationship between science and law and between scientific proof and discretionary power (or intime conviction) of the judge.
topic scuola di polizia scientifica
ottolenghi, salvatore
antropometria
dattiloscopia.
url http://www.ibraspp.com.br/revista/index.php/RBDPP/article/view/597
work_keys_str_mv AT loredanagarlati theoriginsofscientificevidencesalvatoreottolenghispoliceschool
AT loredanagarlati originsofscientificevidencesalvatoreottolenghispoliceschool
_version_ 1721186181083824128