Methods of Promoting Professional Agency at Work
In the midst of continuous changes in working life, finding a way to balance organizational demands and the needs of employees has become an important task. This task has highlighted the significance of agency and social interaction, as influencing factors that can enhance people’s potential to meet...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-12-01
|
Series: | Challenges |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/11/2/30 |
id |
doaj-0c292b3607d147778e7b8727d72755d1 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0c292b3607d147778e7b8727d72755d12020-12-05T00:04:47ZengMDPI AGChallenges2078-15472020-12-0111303010.3390/challe11020030Methods of Promoting Professional Agency at WorkSatu Kalliola0Salme Mahlakaarto1Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Kalevantie 4, 33014 Tampere, FinlandID Mahlakaarto Ltd. (Private Company), Kauppakatu 14 B 11, 33210 Tampere, FinlandIn the midst of continuous changes in working life, finding a way to balance organizational demands and the needs of employees has become an important task. This task has highlighted the significance of agency and social interaction, as influencing factors that can enhance people’s potential to meet new learning tasks. In the Scandinavian and Finnish contexts, research institutions, in cooperation with work organizations, have developed practical methods to promote agency and learning at work. The objective of this study is to evaluate the potential of two different workplace development methods, identity (ID) training, and participatory action research (PAR) using dialogue forums if combined and applied as a two-level approach. The study asks what the characteristics of these methods are in general and if there are any key characteristics that could support their combined application. The research question is answered by a qualitative descriptive analysis of the literature on organizations, agency, and applications of the methods. The results shed light on and emphasize the intertwining characteristics of the methods. The research concludes with the hypothesis—to be tested in further research—that the methods are necessary for each other and recommends a preliminary investigation on the prevailing organizational culture, as a resource for organization-specific modifications.https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/11/2/30agencydialoguework organization |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Satu Kalliola Salme Mahlakaarto |
spellingShingle |
Satu Kalliola Salme Mahlakaarto Methods of Promoting Professional Agency at Work Challenges agency dialogue work organization |
author_facet |
Satu Kalliola Salme Mahlakaarto |
author_sort |
Satu Kalliola |
title |
Methods of Promoting Professional Agency at Work |
title_short |
Methods of Promoting Professional Agency at Work |
title_full |
Methods of Promoting Professional Agency at Work |
title_fullStr |
Methods of Promoting Professional Agency at Work |
title_full_unstemmed |
Methods of Promoting Professional Agency at Work |
title_sort |
methods of promoting professional agency at work |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Challenges |
issn |
2078-1547 |
publishDate |
2020-12-01 |
description |
In the midst of continuous changes in working life, finding a way to balance organizational demands and the needs of employees has become an important task. This task has highlighted the significance of agency and social interaction, as influencing factors that can enhance people’s potential to meet new learning tasks. In the Scandinavian and Finnish contexts, research institutions, in cooperation with work organizations, have developed practical methods to promote agency and learning at work. The objective of this study is to evaluate the potential of two different workplace development methods, identity (ID) training, and participatory action research (PAR) using dialogue forums if combined and applied as a two-level approach. The study asks what the characteristics of these methods are in general and if there are any key characteristics that could support their combined application. The research question is answered by a qualitative descriptive analysis of the literature on organizations, agency, and applications of the methods. The results shed light on and emphasize the intertwining characteristics of the methods. The research concludes with the hypothesis—to be tested in further research—that the methods are necessary for each other and recommends a preliminary investigation on the prevailing organizational culture, as a resource for organization-specific modifications. |
topic |
agency dialogue work organization |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/11/2/30 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT satukalliola methodsofpromotingprofessionalagencyatwork AT salmemahlakaarto methodsofpromotingprofessionalagencyatwork |
_version_ |
1724399999546032128 |