Decision-Making Styles in the Workplace
Two procedures were adopted to assess decision-making styles in the workplace: (a) the administration of traditional standardized self-report questionnaires and (b) open-ended questions about the way respondents would take decisions in a critical business case. Seventy-four adults were given two que...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2012-05-01
|
Series: | SAGE Open |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244012448082 |
id |
doaj-0c1247fcc18c472886179e77f67a4a75 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0c1247fcc18c472886179e77f67a4a752020-11-25T02:50:11ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402012-05-01210.1177/215824401244808210.1177_2158244012448082Decision-Making Styles in the WorkplaceSilvia Raffaldi0Paola Iannello1Laura Vittani2Alessandro Antonietti3Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milano, ItalyCatholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milano, ItalyChamber of Commerce, Industry, Craft Trade, and Agriculture of Milano, ItalyCatholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milano, ItalyTwo procedures were adopted to assess decision-making styles in the workplace: (a) the administration of traditional standardized self-report questionnaires and (b) open-ended questions about the way respondents would take decisions in a critical business case. Seventy-four adults were given two questionnaires: the Preference for Intuition and Deliberation , which assesses “deliberative” or “intuitive” decision style, and the Style of Learning and Thinking , which assesses thinking styles as “left” (namely, analytical-systematic) or “right” (that is, global-intuitive). Participants were also presented with a business case that involved taking a decision. Responses to the business case were used to classify approaches to decision making as “analytical-systematic” or “global-intuitive.” Results showed that the questionnaires correlated consistently with scores from the business case, thus supporting the notion that the assessment of decision style through self-report questionnaires is reliable and valid.https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244012448082 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Silvia Raffaldi Paola Iannello Laura Vittani Alessandro Antonietti |
spellingShingle |
Silvia Raffaldi Paola Iannello Laura Vittani Alessandro Antonietti Decision-Making Styles in the Workplace SAGE Open |
author_facet |
Silvia Raffaldi Paola Iannello Laura Vittani Alessandro Antonietti |
author_sort |
Silvia Raffaldi |
title |
Decision-Making Styles in the Workplace |
title_short |
Decision-Making Styles in the Workplace |
title_full |
Decision-Making Styles in the Workplace |
title_fullStr |
Decision-Making Styles in the Workplace |
title_full_unstemmed |
Decision-Making Styles in the Workplace |
title_sort |
decision-making styles in the workplace |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
SAGE Open |
issn |
2158-2440 |
publishDate |
2012-05-01 |
description |
Two procedures were adopted to assess decision-making styles in the workplace: (a) the administration of traditional standardized self-report questionnaires and (b) open-ended questions about the way respondents would take decisions in a critical business case. Seventy-four adults were given two questionnaires: the Preference for Intuition and Deliberation , which assesses “deliberative” or “intuitive” decision style, and the Style of Learning and Thinking , which assesses thinking styles as “left” (namely, analytical-systematic) or “right” (that is, global-intuitive). Participants were also presented with a business case that involved taking a decision. Responses to the business case were used to classify approaches to decision making as “analytical-systematic” or “global-intuitive.” Results showed that the questionnaires correlated consistently with scores from the business case, thus supporting the notion that the assessment of decision style through self-report questionnaires is reliable and valid. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244012448082 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT silviaraffaldi decisionmakingstylesintheworkplace AT paolaiannello decisionmakingstylesintheworkplace AT lauravittani decisionmakingstylesintheworkplace AT alessandroantonietti decisionmakingstylesintheworkplace |
_version_ |
1724739450956677120 |