Decision-Making Styles in the Workplace

Two procedures were adopted to assess decision-making styles in the workplace: (a) the administration of traditional standardized self-report questionnaires and (b) open-ended questions about the way respondents would take decisions in a critical business case. Seventy-four adults were given two que...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Silvia Raffaldi, Paola Iannello, Laura Vittani, Alessandro Antonietti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2012-05-01
Series:SAGE Open
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244012448082
id doaj-0c1247fcc18c472886179e77f67a4a75
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0c1247fcc18c472886179e77f67a4a752020-11-25T02:50:11ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402012-05-01210.1177/215824401244808210.1177_2158244012448082Decision-Making Styles in the WorkplaceSilvia Raffaldi0Paola Iannello1Laura Vittani2Alessandro Antonietti3Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milano, ItalyCatholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milano, ItalyChamber of Commerce, Industry, Craft Trade, and Agriculture of Milano, ItalyCatholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milano, ItalyTwo procedures were adopted to assess decision-making styles in the workplace: (a) the administration of traditional standardized self-report questionnaires and (b) open-ended questions about the way respondents would take decisions in a critical business case. Seventy-four adults were given two questionnaires: the Preference for Intuition and Deliberation , which assesses “deliberative” or “intuitive” decision style, and the Style of Learning and Thinking , which assesses thinking styles as “left” (namely, analytical-systematic) or “right” (that is, global-intuitive). Participants were also presented with a business case that involved taking a decision. Responses to the business case were used to classify approaches to decision making as “analytical-systematic” or “global-intuitive.” Results showed that the questionnaires correlated consistently with scores from the business case, thus supporting the notion that the assessment of decision style through self-report questionnaires is reliable and valid.https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244012448082
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Silvia Raffaldi
Paola Iannello
Laura Vittani
Alessandro Antonietti
spellingShingle Silvia Raffaldi
Paola Iannello
Laura Vittani
Alessandro Antonietti
Decision-Making Styles in the Workplace
SAGE Open
author_facet Silvia Raffaldi
Paola Iannello
Laura Vittani
Alessandro Antonietti
author_sort Silvia Raffaldi
title Decision-Making Styles in the Workplace
title_short Decision-Making Styles in the Workplace
title_full Decision-Making Styles in the Workplace
title_fullStr Decision-Making Styles in the Workplace
title_full_unstemmed Decision-Making Styles in the Workplace
title_sort decision-making styles in the workplace
publisher SAGE Publishing
series SAGE Open
issn 2158-2440
publishDate 2012-05-01
description Two procedures were adopted to assess decision-making styles in the workplace: (a) the administration of traditional standardized self-report questionnaires and (b) open-ended questions about the way respondents would take decisions in a critical business case. Seventy-four adults were given two questionnaires: the Preference for Intuition and Deliberation , which assesses “deliberative” or “intuitive” decision style, and the Style of Learning and Thinking , which assesses thinking styles as “left” (namely, analytical-systematic) or “right” (that is, global-intuitive). Participants were also presented with a business case that involved taking a decision. Responses to the business case were used to classify approaches to decision making as “analytical-systematic” or “global-intuitive.” Results showed that the questionnaires correlated consistently with scores from the business case, thus supporting the notion that the assessment of decision style through self-report questionnaires is reliable and valid.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244012448082
work_keys_str_mv AT silviaraffaldi decisionmakingstylesintheworkplace
AT paolaiannello decisionmakingstylesintheworkplace
AT lauravittani decisionmakingstylesintheworkplace
AT alessandroantonietti decisionmakingstylesintheworkplace
_version_ 1724739450956677120