Common drug review recommendations for orphan drugs in Canada: basis of recommendations and comparison with similar reviews in Quebec, Australia, Scotland and New Zealand

Abstract Background Public payer reimbursement for non-oncology drugs in Canada, including orphan drugs, is based on recommendations by the Common Drug Review (CDR) (with the exception of Quebec). CDR has been criticized for negative recommendations for orphan drugs and contributing to delays in pat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: John I. McCormick, L. Diana Berescu, Nabil Tadros
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-01-01
Series:Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13023-018-0759-9
id doaj-0c0b14f4e54447a0a19261728a7501dc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0c0b14f4e54447a0a19261728a7501dc2020-11-25T00:09:19ZengBMCOrphanet Journal of Rare Diseases1750-11722018-01-0113111210.1186/s13023-018-0759-9Common drug review recommendations for orphan drugs in Canada: basis of recommendations and comparison with similar reviews in Quebec, Australia, Scotland and New ZealandJohn I. McCormick0L. Diana Berescu1Nabil Tadros2McKesson Specialty HealthMcKesson Specialty HealthMcKesson Specialty HealthAbstract Background Public payer reimbursement for non-oncology drugs in Canada, including orphan drugs, is based on recommendations by the Common Drug Review (CDR) (with the exception of Quebec). CDR has been criticized for negative recommendations for orphan drugs and contributing to delays in patient access to these drugs. However, it is unclear how CDR makes recommendations for orphan drugs and the role clinical and economic factors play in decision making. The objective of the present study was to analyze the basis for CDR orphan drug recommendations and to compare recommendations to those in other jurisdictions. Methods A list of orphan drugs reviewed by CDR (between 2004 and 2017) was compiled and final recommendations (list/do not list) assessed. The basis of each recommendation was categorized as clinical only, price only or combined clinical and price factors, based on the ranking of clinical and price parameters in recommendation summaries. The reimbursement status of the same drugs was determined in Quebec and other jurisdictions and level of agreement with CDR decisions assessed using a kappa analysis. Results Sixty eight orphan drug submissions were identified in the CDR database. Clinical, clinical and price and price parameters were the basis of 48.5%, 44.1% and 7.4% of the reviews, respectively, and corresponding positive recommendation rates were 45.5%, 86.7% and 40.0% (p = 0.0008); overall positive recommendation rate was 63.2%. Positive recommendation rate increased from 50.0% for drugs reviewed between 2004 and 2009 to 86.7% in 2016; however, 84.6% of the latter were conditional on a price reduction. Of the drugs reviewed by CDR, 80.9%, 88.2%, 80.9% and 58.8% were reviewed for the same indications by health technology assessment agencies in Quebec, Scotland, Australia and New Zealand, respectively, with positive listing rates ranging from 60.0% (Quebec) to 92.7% (Australia) with fair (kappa coefficient 0.3307) to poor (kappa coefficient 0.0611) agreement with CDR in listing decisions, respectively. Conclusions The positive CDR recommendation rate for orphan drugs was highest when clinical and price parameters supported the assessment. Over time there has been an increase in CDR positive recommendation rates for orphan drugs, although most are conditional on a price reduction. It is unclear if this change in CDR recommendations will impact equitable and timely access to orphan drugs across Canada.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13023-018-0759-9Common Drug ReviewOrphan drugsCanadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in HealthReimbursementCost-utility
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author John I. McCormick
L. Diana Berescu
Nabil Tadros
spellingShingle John I. McCormick
L. Diana Berescu
Nabil Tadros
Common drug review recommendations for orphan drugs in Canada: basis of recommendations and comparison with similar reviews in Quebec, Australia, Scotland and New Zealand
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
Common Drug Review
Orphan drugs
Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health
Reimbursement
Cost-utility
author_facet John I. McCormick
L. Diana Berescu
Nabil Tadros
author_sort John I. McCormick
title Common drug review recommendations for orphan drugs in Canada: basis of recommendations and comparison with similar reviews in Quebec, Australia, Scotland and New Zealand
title_short Common drug review recommendations for orphan drugs in Canada: basis of recommendations and comparison with similar reviews in Quebec, Australia, Scotland and New Zealand
title_full Common drug review recommendations for orphan drugs in Canada: basis of recommendations and comparison with similar reviews in Quebec, Australia, Scotland and New Zealand
title_fullStr Common drug review recommendations for orphan drugs in Canada: basis of recommendations and comparison with similar reviews in Quebec, Australia, Scotland and New Zealand
title_full_unstemmed Common drug review recommendations for orphan drugs in Canada: basis of recommendations and comparison with similar reviews in Quebec, Australia, Scotland and New Zealand
title_sort common drug review recommendations for orphan drugs in canada: basis of recommendations and comparison with similar reviews in quebec, australia, scotland and new zealand
publisher BMC
series Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
issn 1750-1172
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Abstract Background Public payer reimbursement for non-oncology drugs in Canada, including orphan drugs, is based on recommendations by the Common Drug Review (CDR) (with the exception of Quebec). CDR has been criticized for negative recommendations for orphan drugs and contributing to delays in patient access to these drugs. However, it is unclear how CDR makes recommendations for orphan drugs and the role clinical and economic factors play in decision making. The objective of the present study was to analyze the basis for CDR orphan drug recommendations and to compare recommendations to those in other jurisdictions. Methods A list of orphan drugs reviewed by CDR (between 2004 and 2017) was compiled and final recommendations (list/do not list) assessed. The basis of each recommendation was categorized as clinical only, price only or combined clinical and price factors, based on the ranking of clinical and price parameters in recommendation summaries. The reimbursement status of the same drugs was determined in Quebec and other jurisdictions and level of agreement with CDR decisions assessed using a kappa analysis. Results Sixty eight orphan drug submissions were identified in the CDR database. Clinical, clinical and price and price parameters were the basis of 48.5%, 44.1% and 7.4% of the reviews, respectively, and corresponding positive recommendation rates were 45.5%, 86.7% and 40.0% (p = 0.0008); overall positive recommendation rate was 63.2%. Positive recommendation rate increased from 50.0% for drugs reviewed between 2004 and 2009 to 86.7% in 2016; however, 84.6% of the latter were conditional on a price reduction. Of the drugs reviewed by CDR, 80.9%, 88.2%, 80.9% and 58.8% were reviewed for the same indications by health technology assessment agencies in Quebec, Scotland, Australia and New Zealand, respectively, with positive listing rates ranging from 60.0% (Quebec) to 92.7% (Australia) with fair (kappa coefficient 0.3307) to poor (kappa coefficient 0.0611) agreement with CDR in listing decisions, respectively. Conclusions The positive CDR recommendation rate for orphan drugs was highest when clinical and price parameters supported the assessment. Over time there has been an increase in CDR positive recommendation rates for orphan drugs, although most are conditional on a price reduction. It is unclear if this change in CDR recommendations will impact equitable and timely access to orphan drugs across Canada.
topic Common Drug Review
Orphan drugs
Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health
Reimbursement
Cost-utility
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13023-018-0759-9
work_keys_str_mv AT johnimccormick commondrugreviewrecommendationsfororphandrugsincanadabasisofrecommendationsandcomparisonwithsimilarreviewsinquebecaustraliascotlandandnewzealand
AT ldianaberescu commondrugreviewrecommendationsfororphandrugsincanadabasisofrecommendationsandcomparisonwithsimilarreviewsinquebecaustraliascotlandandnewzealand
AT nabiltadros commondrugreviewrecommendationsfororphandrugsincanadabasisofrecommendationsandcomparisonwithsimilarreviewsinquebecaustraliascotlandandnewzealand
_version_ 1725412621696368640