CORRECTION OF GLOBAL AND REFLEX RADIATION VALUES MEASURED ABOVE THE LAKE BALATON

Albedo measurements have been carried out since 2007 above the Lake Balaton near Keszthely and Siofok. It turned out that a systematic offset error was superposed to both the global and the reflex radiation. The value of this systematic error was approximately constant per pyranometer within a year...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laszlo Menyhart, Angéla ANDA
Format: Article
Language:Bulgarian
Published: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Agriculture 2014-03-01
Series:Journal of Central European Agriculture
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jcea.agr.hr/articles/774366_BALATON_FELETT_M_RT_GLOB_L_S_REFLEXSUG_RZ_S_RT_KEK_KORREKCI_JA_hu.pdf
id doaj-0c05032cc68946c099c23dff51bc6eb4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0c05032cc68946c099c23dff51bc6eb42020-11-24T23:47:49ZbulUniversity of Zagreb, Faculty of AgricultureJournal of Central European Agriculture1332-90492014-03-0115122223510.5513/JCEA01/15.1.1440CORRECTION OF GLOBAL AND REFLEX RADIATION VALUES MEASURED ABOVE THE LAKE BALATONLaszlo MenyhartAngéla ANDAAlbedo measurements have been carried out since 2007 above the Lake Balaton near Keszthely and Siofok. It turned out that a systematic offset error was superposed to both the global and the reflex radiation. The value of this systematic error was approximately constant per pyranometer within a year but on the other hand it varied from year to year and from pyranometer to pyranometer. In this paper the values of this systematic errors were determined with two different methods. The difference between the values measured at night-time and the intrinsic thermal offset error of pyranometers were examined with both methods. The base of the first method is the empirical observation, that the values measured at night-time by a global radiometer are typically negative whereas by a reflex radiometer are typically positive. The substance of the second method is utilizing the air temperature measured within 1 as well as 5 hours before the radiation measuring to +select the fully overcast nights, when the thermal offset error of the global radiometer is zero. In addition, the cases where the thermal offset error of the reflex radiometer is zero were selected on the basis of the difference between water and air temperature. When the thermal offset error is zero the measured value is equal to the systematic error. Comparing the results of the two methods showed that the systematic error of the global radiometer were determined with uncertainty of 1 Wm–2, whereas that of the reflex radiometer with uncertainty of 2 Wm–2. The calibration constants were recalculated from the values being in the calibration reports taking the systematic errors into account.http://jcea.agr.hr/articles/774366_BALATON_FELETT_M_RT_GLOB_L_S_REFLEXSUG_RZ_S_RT_KEK_KORREKCI_JA_hu.pdfalbedometeradatkorrekciópiranométertermikus offszet
collection DOAJ
language Bulgarian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Laszlo Menyhart
Angéla ANDA
spellingShingle Laszlo Menyhart
Angéla ANDA
CORRECTION OF GLOBAL AND REFLEX RADIATION VALUES MEASURED ABOVE THE LAKE BALATON
Journal of Central European Agriculture
albedometer
adatkorrekció
piranométer
termikus offszet
author_facet Laszlo Menyhart
Angéla ANDA
author_sort Laszlo Menyhart
title CORRECTION OF GLOBAL AND REFLEX RADIATION VALUES MEASURED ABOVE THE LAKE BALATON
title_short CORRECTION OF GLOBAL AND REFLEX RADIATION VALUES MEASURED ABOVE THE LAKE BALATON
title_full CORRECTION OF GLOBAL AND REFLEX RADIATION VALUES MEASURED ABOVE THE LAKE BALATON
title_fullStr CORRECTION OF GLOBAL AND REFLEX RADIATION VALUES MEASURED ABOVE THE LAKE BALATON
title_full_unstemmed CORRECTION OF GLOBAL AND REFLEX RADIATION VALUES MEASURED ABOVE THE LAKE BALATON
title_sort correction of global and reflex radiation values measured above the lake balaton
publisher University of Zagreb, Faculty of Agriculture
series Journal of Central European Agriculture
issn 1332-9049
publishDate 2014-03-01
description Albedo measurements have been carried out since 2007 above the Lake Balaton near Keszthely and Siofok. It turned out that a systematic offset error was superposed to both the global and the reflex radiation. The value of this systematic error was approximately constant per pyranometer within a year but on the other hand it varied from year to year and from pyranometer to pyranometer. In this paper the values of this systematic errors were determined with two different methods. The difference between the values measured at night-time and the intrinsic thermal offset error of pyranometers were examined with both methods. The base of the first method is the empirical observation, that the values measured at night-time by a global radiometer are typically negative whereas by a reflex radiometer are typically positive. The substance of the second method is utilizing the air temperature measured within 1 as well as 5 hours before the radiation measuring to +select the fully overcast nights, when the thermal offset error of the global radiometer is zero. In addition, the cases where the thermal offset error of the reflex radiometer is zero were selected on the basis of the difference between water and air temperature. When the thermal offset error is zero the measured value is equal to the systematic error. Comparing the results of the two methods showed that the systematic error of the global radiometer were determined with uncertainty of 1 Wm–2, whereas that of the reflex radiometer with uncertainty of 2 Wm–2. The calibration constants were recalculated from the values being in the calibration reports taking the systematic errors into account.
topic albedometer
adatkorrekció
piranométer
termikus offszet
url http://jcea.agr.hr/articles/774366_BALATON_FELETT_M_RT_GLOB_L_S_REFLEXSUG_RZ_S_RT_KEK_KORREKCI_JA_hu.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT laszlomenyhart correctionofglobalandreflexradiationvaluesmeasuredabovethelakebalaton
AT angelaanda correctionofglobalandreflexradiationvaluesmeasuredabovethelakebalaton
_version_ 1725488481684160512