'Andere katholieken': een nieuwe visie

<strong><em>‘Other Catholics’: A New Vision</em></strong><br />The title of my response to De Rooy’s text sums up the crux of our discussion. Andere katholieken, a volume of essays published in the year 2000, offers ‘a new vision’ of the history of Dutch Catholicism in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: P. Luykx
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Open Journals 2009-01-01
Series:BMGN: Low Countries Historical Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.bmgn-lchr.nl/articles/6896
id doaj-0bef24c26a854b248d8d039b2cdc3ece
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0bef24c26a854b248d8d039b2cdc3ece2021-10-02T09:00:09ZengOpen JournalsBMGN: Low Countries Historical Review0165-05052211-28982009-01-011241758110.18352/bmgn-lchr.68966864'Andere katholieken': een nieuwe visieP. Luykx<strong><em>‘Other Catholics’: A New Vision</em></strong><br />The title of my response to De Rooy’s text sums up the crux of our discussion. Andere katholieken, a volume of essays published in the year 2000, offers ‘a new vision’ of the history of Dutch Catholicism in the twentieth century. Contrary to the prevailing idea of an unshakable unity and a closed front, recent studies demonstrate more and more clearly variation and differentiation in mentality and behaviour, above all under the influence of a progressive modernization of state and society. It is the so-called pillarization theory, in particular, which was put forward by a group of politicologists (notably A. Lijphart), that seems to influence the view of my opponent. According to that theory, passivity and docility of, among others, Catholic people is unjustly assumed. Last but not least, my response aims to correct some inaccuracies and clear up some misunderstandings in my opponent’s critique.<br /><div> </div><div>This article is part of the <a href="/417/volume/124/issue/1/">forum</a> 'Recent studies about Dutch Catholicism'.</div>https://www.bmgn-lchr.nl/articles/6896Roman Catholicsm
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author P. Luykx
spellingShingle P. Luykx
'Andere katholieken': een nieuwe visie
BMGN: Low Countries Historical Review
Roman Catholicsm
author_facet P. Luykx
author_sort P. Luykx
title 'Andere katholieken': een nieuwe visie
title_short 'Andere katholieken': een nieuwe visie
title_full 'Andere katholieken': een nieuwe visie
title_fullStr 'Andere katholieken': een nieuwe visie
title_full_unstemmed 'Andere katholieken': een nieuwe visie
title_sort 'andere katholieken': een nieuwe visie
publisher Open Journals
series BMGN: Low Countries Historical Review
issn 0165-0505
2211-2898
publishDate 2009-01-01
description <strong><em>‘Other Catholics’: A New Vision</em></strong><br />The title of my response to De Rooy’s text sums up the crux of our discussion. Andere katholieken, a volume of essays published in the year 2000, offers ‘a new vision’ of the history of Dutch Catholicism in the twentieth century. Contrary to the prevailing idea of an unshakable unity and a closed front, recent studies demonstrate more and more clearly variation and differentiation in mentality and behaviour, above all under the influence of a progressive modernization of state and society. It is the so-called pillarization theory, in particular, which was put forward by a group of politicologists (notably A. Lijphart), that seems to influence the view of my opponent. According to that theory, passivity and docility of, among others, Catholic people is unjustly assumed. Last but not least, my response aims to correct some inaccuracies and clear up some misunderstandings in my opponent’s critique.<br /><div> </div><div>This article is part of the <a href="/417/volume/124/issue/1/">forum</a> 'Recent studies about Dutch Catholicism'.</div>
topic Roman Catholicsm
url https://www.bmgn-lchr.nl/articles/6896
work_keys_str_mv AT pluykx anderekatholiekeneennieuwevisie
_version_ 1716856736484163584