Responsible Subjects

This essay reflects on the constitution of subjectivity in relation to transcendence specifically through an analysis of responsibility. The openness to re-thinking transcendence in continental philosophy led to a corollary re-thinking of subjectivity as constituted in response to otherness or trans...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tamsin Jones
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Babes-Bolyai University 2018-05-01
Series:Diakrisis
Online Access:http://journals.orth.ro/index.php/diakrisis/article/view/122
id doaj-0be9e582645e4e62b2d97cef453a3ce8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0be9e582645e4e62b2d97cef453a3ce82020-11-25T01:16:35ZdeuBabes-Bolyai UniversityDiakrisis2601-72612601-74152018-05-011617510.24193/diakrisis.2018.4122Responsible SubjectsTamsin Jones0Trinity College, Hartford, CTThis essay reflects on the constitution of subjectivity in relation to transcendence specifically through an analysis of responsibility. The openness to re-thinking transcendence in continental philosophy led to a corollary re-thinking of subjectivity as constituted in response to otherness or transcendence, in such a way, however, that emphasized the utter passivity of the subject. This essay attempts to forge a path forward for thinking about the constitution of responsible subjectivity, beyond the ruinous alternative of either the subjugating or subjugated self, to a subject able to respond to transcendence in such a way that does not threaten the inviolability of transcendence. Deliberating with, and beyond, Jean Wahl, Emmanuel Levinas, and Kelly Oliver, this essay argues that the various accounts of responsibility found in Jewish and Christian scriptures can provide an articulation of subjectivity as constituted by its relation to transcendence, in which transcendence is understood as both a movement and an end—a movement undertaken by a self towards that which remains ever other. Keywords: Emmanuel Levinas, Jean Wahl, Kelly Oliver, transcendence, responsibility, subjectivity, witness, trauma, phenomenology, theologyhttp://journals.orth.ro/index.php/diakrisis/article/view/122
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tamsin Jones
spellingShingle Tamsin Jones
Responsible Subjects
Diakrisis
author_facet Tamsin Jones
author_sort Tamsin Jones
title Responsible Subjects
title_short Responsible Subjects
title_full Responsible Subjects
title_fullStr Responsible Subjects
title_full_unstemmed Responsible Subjects
title_sort responsible subjects
publisher Babes-Bolyai University
series Diakrisis
issn 2601-7261
2601-7415
publishDate 2018-05-01
description This essay reflects on the constitution of subjectivity in relation to transcendence specifically through an analysis of responsibility. The openness to re-thinking transcendence in continental philosophy led to a corollary re-thinking of subjectivity as constituted in response to otherness or transcendence, in such a way, however, that emphasized the utter passivity of the subject. This essay attempts to forge a path forward for thinking about the constitution of responsible subjectivity, beyond the ruinous alternative of either the subjugating or subjugated self, to a subject able to respond to transcendence in such a way that does not threaten the inviolability of transcendence. Deliberating with, and beyond, Jean Wahl, Emmanuel Levinas, and Kelly Oliver, this essay argues that the various accounts of responsibility found in Jewish and Christian scriptures can provide an articulation of subjectivity as constituted by its relation to transcendence, in which transcendence is understood as both a movement and an end—a movement undertaken by a self towards that which remains ever other. Keywords: Emmanuel Levinas, Jean Wahl, Kelly Oliver, transcendence, responsibility, subjectivity, witness, trauma, phenomenology, theology
url http://journals.orth.ro/index.php/diakrisis/article/view/122
work_keys_str_mv AT tamsinjones responsiblesubjects
_version_ 1725149282917416960