A Study on Profit Distribution for Water Rights Cooperation Taking into Account Dominant Power of Transfer Sectors

In this paper, we explore the issue of profit distribution for water resources collaborative alliances that are composed of one single water rights transfer sector and several water resources requirement sectors. Considering the dominant position of the water rights transfer sector in water resource...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jiayin Tan, Dakui Jiang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2018-01-01
Series:Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8397837
id doaj-0be22f3bf5f041c3b1f389219cf2df27
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0be22f3bf5f041c3b1f389219cf2df272020-11-24T22:09:56ZengHindawi LimitedMathematical Problems in Engineering1024-123X1563-51472018-01-01201810.1155/2018/83978378397837A Study on Profit Distribution for Water Rights Cooperation Taking into Account Dominant Power of Transfer SectorsJiayin Tan0Dakui Jiang1School of Management Science and Engineering, Nanjing Audit University, Nanjing 211815, ChinaCollege of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, ChinaIn this paper, we explore the issue of profit distribution for water resources collaborative alliances that are composed of one single water rights transfer sector and several water resources requirement sectors. Considering the dominant position of the water rights transfer sector in water resources cooperation, we propose a novel 3-step approach on profit distribution for coalitions by applying game theory for interactions that include coalition structures and permission structures. We examine the effectiveness of this approach by a case study of water rights cooperation between the agriculture sector and agroindustrial sectors of the Karoon river basin in Iran. The results show that this approach allows players who have veto rights to obtain more payoffs from the coalition’s profit distribution in contrast to using the Owen value. In other words, the distribution results of the 3-step approach reflect the advantage held by the water rights transfer sector based on its veto power. Further, our proposed 3-step approach takes the permission structure among a priori unions into consideration when distributing the profits of the water resources coalition while the P-Owen value considers only the permission structure among players.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8397837
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jiayin Tan
Dakui Jiang
spellingShingle Jiayin Tan
Dakui Jiang
A Study on Profit Distribution for Water Rights Cooperation Taking into Account Dominant Power of Transfer Sectors
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
author_facet Jiayin Tan
Dakui Jiang
author_sort Jiayin Tan
title A Study on Profit Distribution for Water Rights Cooperation Taking into Account Dominant Power of Transfer Sectors
title_short A Study on Profit Distribution for Water Rights Cooperation Taking into Account Dominant Power of Transfer Sectors
title_full A Study on Profit Distribution for Water Rights Cooperation Taking into Account Dominant Power of Transfer Sectors
title_fullStr A Study on Profit Distribution for Water Rights Cooperation Taking into Account Dominant Power of Transfer Sectors
title_full_unstemmed A Study on Profit Distribution for Water Rights Cooperation Taking into Account Dominant Power of Transfer Sectors
title_sort study on profit distribution for water rights cooperation taking into account dominant power of transfer sectors
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Mathematical Problems in Engineering
issn 1024-123X
1563-5147
publishDate 2018-01-01
description In this paper, we explore the issue of profit distribution for water resources collaborative alliances that are composed of one single water rights transfer sector and several water resources requirement sectors. Considering the dominant position of the water rights transfer sector in water resources cooperation, we propose a novel 3-step approach on profit distribution for coalitions by applying game theory for interactions that include coalition structures and permission structures. We examine the effectiveness of this approach by a case study of water rights cooperation between the agriculture sector and agroindustrial sectors of the Karoon river basin in Iran. The results show that this approach allows players who have veto rights to obtain more payoffs from the coalition’s profit distribution in contrast to using the Owen value. In other words, the distribution results of the 3-step approach reflect the advantage held by the water rights transfer sector based on its veto power. Further, our proposed 3-step approach takes the permission structure among a priori unions into consideration when distributing the profits of the water resources coalition while the P-Owen value considers only the permission structure among players.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8397837
work_keys_str_mv AT jiayintan astudyonprofitdistributionforwaterrightscooperationtakingintoaccountdominantpoweroftransfersectors
AT dakuijiang astudyonprofitdistributionforwaterrightscooperationtakingintoaccountdominantpoweroftransfersectors
AT jiayintan studyonprofitdistributionforwaterrightscooperationtakingintoaccountdominantpoweroftransfersectors
AT dakuijiang studyonprofitdistributionforwaterrightscooperationtakingintoaccountdominantpoweroftransfersectors
_version_ 1725809931528962048