A Study on Profit Distribution for Water Rights Cooperation Taking into Account Dominant Power of Transfer Sectors
In this paper, we explore the issue of profit distribution for water resources collaborative alliances that are composed of one single water rights transfer sector and several water resources requirement sectors. Considering the dominant position of the water rights transfer sector in water resource...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2018-01-01
|
Series: | Mathematical Problems in Engineering |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8397837 |
id |
doaj-0be22f3bf5f041c3b1f389219cf2df27 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0be22f3bf5f041c3b1f389219cf2df272020-11-24T22:09:56ZengHindawi LimitedMathematical Problems in Engineering1024-123X1563-51472018-01-01201810.1155/2018/83978378397837A Study on Profit Distribution for Water Rights Cooperation Taking into Account Dominant Power of Transfer SectorsJiayin Tan0Dakui Jiang1School of Management Science and Engineering, Nanjing Audit University, Nanjing 211815, ChinaCollege of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, ChinaIn this paper, we explore the issue of profit distribution for water resources collaborative alliances that are composed of one single water rights transfer sector and several water resources requirement sectors. Considering the dominant position of the water rights transfer sector in water resources cooperation, we propose a novel 3-step approach on profit distribution for coalitions by applying game theory for interactions that include coalition structures and permission structures. We examine the effectiveness of this approach by a case study of water rights cooperation between the agriculture sector and agroindustrial sectors of the Karoon river basin in Iran. The results show that this approach allows players who have veto rights to obtain more payoffs from the coalition’s profit distribution in contrast to using the Owen value. In other words, the distribution results of the 3-step approach reflect the advantage held by the water rights transfer sector based on its veto power. Further, our proposed 3-step approach takes the permission structure among a priori unions into consideration when distributing the profits of the water resources coalition while the P-Owen value considers only the permission structure among players.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8397837 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jiayin Tan Dakui Jiang |
spellingShingle |
Jiayin Tan Dakui Jiang A Study on Profit Distribution for Water Rights Cooperation Taking into Account Dominant Power of Transfer Sectors Mathematical Problems in Engineering |
author_facet |
Jiayin Tan Dakui Jiang |
author_sort |
Jiayin Tan |
title |
A Study on Profit Distribution for Water Rights Cooperation Taking into Account Dominant Power of Transfer Sectors |
title_short |
A Study on Profit Distribution for Water Rights Cooperation Taking into Account Dominant Power of Transfer Sectors |
title_full |
A Study on Profit Distribution for Water Rights Cooperation Taking into Account Dominant Power of Transfer Sectors |
title_fullStr |
A Study on Profit Distribution for Water Rights Cooperation Taking into Account Dominant Power of Transfer Sectors |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Study on Profit Distribution for Water Rights Cooperation Taking into Account Dominant Power of Transfer Sectors |
title_sort |
study on profit distribution for water rights cooperation taking into account dominant power of transfer sectors |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
Mathematical Problems in Engineering |
issn |
1024-123X 1563-5147 |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
In this paper, we explore the issue of profit distribution for water resources collaborative alliances that are composed of one single water rights transfer sector and several water resources requirement sectors. Considering the dominant position of the water rights transfer sector in water resources cooperation, we propose a novel 3-step approach on profit distribution for coalitions by applying game theory for interactions that include coalition structures and permission structures. We examine the effectiveness of this approach by a case study of water rights cooperation between the agriculture sector and agroindustrial sectors of the Karoon river basin in Iran. The results show that this approach allows players who have veto rights to obtain more payoffs from the coalition’s profit distribution in contrast to using the Owen value. In other words, the distribution results of the 3-step approach reflect the advantage held by the water rights transfer sector based on its veto power. Further, our proposed 3-step approach takes the permission structure among a priori unions into consideration when distributing the profits of the water resources coalition while the P-Owen value considers only the permission structure among players. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8397837 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jiayintan astudyonprofitdistributionforwaterrightscooperationtakingintoaccountdominantpoweroftransfersectors AT dakuijiang astudyonprofitdistributionforwaterrightscooperationtakingintoaccountdominantpoweroftransfersectors AT jiayintan studyonprofitdistributionforwaterrightscooperationtakingintoaccountdominantpoweroftransfersectors AT dakuijiang studyonprofitdistributionforwaterrightscooperationtakingintoaccountdominantpoweroftransfersectors |
_version_ |
1725809931528962048 |