London 1940-1945, A Europe in Miniature? The Case of Norwegian, Polish and Czechoslovak Exiles

This paper discusses experience of representatives of three European small powers assembled in the London during WWII - Norway, Czechoslovakia and Poland. A common cause, comparable setting and frequent contacts created a promising framework for a new quality of their mutual relations that could, e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pavol Jakubec
Format: Article
Language:Portuguese
Published: Coimbra University Press 2015-07-01
Series:Debater a Europa
Subjects:
Online Access:https://impactum-journals.uc.pt/debatereuropa/article/view/3685
id doaj-0bcfbeb4322742a9aa3c0807f57e4ae5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0bcfbeb4322742a9aa3c0807f57e4ae52020-11-25T03:59:13ZporCoimbra University PressDebater a Europa1647-63362015-07-011310.14195/1647-6336_13_6London 1940-1945, A Europe in Miniature? The Case of Norwegian, Polish and Czechoslovak ExilesPavol Jakubec0PhD Candidate in History University of Gothenburg (Sweden) – National Graduate School of History This paper discusses experience of representatives of three European small powers assembled in the London during WWII - Norway, Czechoslovakia and Poland. A common cause, comparable setting and frequent contacts created a promising framework for a new quality of their mutual relations that could, eventually, endorse the European idea. This proved to be at best a partial success: The exiles acted by-and-large as guardians of national interests and identities. As such, and owing to their strained position, they paid considerable attention to status as a principal asset. They subscribed of internalization of their foreign policies and learned or refined their experience with its practices. Yet their visions remained rather regional, with only occasional reference to the idea of European Integration. Albeit the exiles failed to integrate the nations they spoke for, they established closer and better informed transnational ties bound to affect European politics in the years to come.  http://dx.doi.org/10.14195/1647-6336_13_6 https://impactum-journals.uc.pt/debatereuropa/article/view/3685small powersexileWorld War IIforeign policyintegration
collection DOAJ
language Portuguese
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Pavol Jakubec
spellingShingle Pavol Jakubec
London 1940-1945, A Europe in Miniature? The Case of Norwegian, Polish and Czechoslovak Exiles
Debater a Europa
small powers
exile
World War II
foreign policy
integration
author_facet Pavol Jakubec
author_sort Pavol Jakubec
title London 1940-1945, A Europe in Miniature? The Case of Norwegian, Polish and Czechoslovak Exiles
title_short London 1940-1945, A Europe in Miniature? The Case of Norwegian, Polish and Czechoslovak Exiles
title_full London 1940-1945, A Europe in Miniature? The Case of Norwegian, Polish and Czechoslovak Exiles
title_fullStr London 1940-1945, A Europe in Miniature? The Case of Norwegian, Polish and Czechoslovak Exiles
title_full_unstemmed London 1940-1945, A Europe in Miniature? The Case of Norwegian, Polish and Czechoslovak Exiles
title_sort london 1940-1945, a europe in miniature? the case of norwegian, polish and czechoslovak exiles
publisher Coimbra University Press
series Debater a Europa
issn 1647-6336
publishDate 2015-07-01
description This paper discusses experience of representatives of three European small powers assembled in the London during WWII - Norway, Czechoslovakia and Poland. A common cause, comparable setting and frequent contacts created a promising framework for a new quality of their mutual relations that could, eventually, endorse the European idea. This proved to be at best a partial success: The exiles acted by-and-large as guardians of national interests and identities. As such, and owing to their strained position, they paid considerable attention to status as a principal asset. They subscribed of internalization of their foreign policies and learned or refined their experience with its practices. Yet their visions remained rather regional, with only occasional reference to the idea of European Integration. Albeit the exiles failed to integrate the nations they spoke for, they established closer and better informed transnational ties bound to affect European politics in the years to come.  http://dx.doi.org/10.14195/1647-6336_13_6
topic small powers
exile
World War II
foreign policy
integration
url https://impactum-journals.uc.pt/debatereuropa/article/view/3685
work_keys_str_mv AT pavoljakubec london19401945aeuropeinminiaturethecaseofnorwegianpolishandczechoslovakexiles
_version_ 1724455119753314304