London 1940-1945, A Europe in Miniature? The Case of Norwegian, Polish and Czechoslovak Exiles
This paper discusses experience of representatives of three European small powers assembled in the London during WWII - Norway, Czechoslovakia and Poland. A common cause, comparable setting and frequent contacts created a promising framework for a new quality of their mutual relations that could, e...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Portuguese |
Published: |
Coimbra University Press
2015-07-01
|
Series: | Debater a Europa |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://impactum-journals.uc.pt/debatereuropa/article/view/3685 |
id |
doaj-0bcfbeb4322742a9aa3c0807f57e4ae5 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0bcfbeb4322742a9aa3c0807f57e4ae52020-11-25T03:59:13ZporCoimbra University PressDebater a Europa1647-63362015-07-011310.14195/1647-6336_13_6London 1940-1945, A Europe in Miniature? The Case of Norwegian, Polish and Czechoslovak ExilesPavol Jakubec0PhD Candidate in History University of Gothenburg (Sweden) – National Graduate School of History This paper discusses experience of representatives of three European small powers assembled in the London during WWII - Norway, Czechoslovakia and Poland. A common cause, comparable setting and frequent contacts created a promising framework for a new quality of their mutual relations that could, eventually, endorse the European idea. This proved to be at best a partial success: The exiles acted by-and-large as guardians of national interests and identities. As such, and owing to their strained position, they paid considerable attention to status as a principal asset. They subscribed of internalization of their foreign policies and learned or refined their experience with its practices. Yet their visions remained rather regional, with only occasional reference to the idea of European Integration. Albeit the exiles failed to integrate the nations they spoke for, they established closer and better informed transnational ties bound to affect European politics in the years to come. http://dx.doi.org/10.14195/1647-6336_13_6 https://impactum-journals.uc.pt/debatereuropa/article/view/3685small powersexileWorld War IIforeign policyintegration |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Portuguese |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Pavol Jakubec |
spellingShingle |
Pavol Jakubec London 1940-1945, A Europe in Miniature? The Case of Norwegian, Polish and Czechoslovak Exiles Debater a Europa small powers exile World War II foreign policy integration |
author_facet |
Pavol Jakubec |
author_sort |
Pavol Jakubec |
title |
London 1940-1945, A Europe in Miniature? The Case of Norwegian, Polish and Czechoslovak Exiles |
title_short |
London 1940-1945, A Europe in Miniature? The Case of Norwegian, Polish and Czechoslovak Exiles |
title_full |
London 1940-1945, A Europe in Miniature? The Case of Norwegian, Polish and Czechoslovak Exiles |
title_fullStr |
London 1940-1945, A Europe in Miniature? The Case of Norwegian, Polish and Czechoslovak Exiles |
title_full_unstemmed |
London 1940-1945, A Europe in Miniature? The Case of Norwegian, Polish and Czechoslovak Exiles |
title_sort |
london 1940-1945, a europe in miniature? the case of norwegian, polish and czechoslovak exiles |
publisher |
Coimbra University Press |
series |
Debater a Europa |
issn |
1647-6336 |
publishDate |
2015-07-01 |
description |
This paper discusses experience of representatives of three European small powers assembled in the London during WWII - Norway, Czechoslovakia and Poland. A common cause, comparable setting and frequent contacts created a promising framework for a new quality of their mutual relations that could, eventually, endorse the European idea. This proved to be at best a partial success: The exiles acted by-and-large as guardians of national interests and identities. As such, and owing to their strained position, they paid considerable attention to status as a principal asset. They subscribed of internalization of their foreign policies and learned or refined their experience with its practices. Yet their visions remained rather regional, with only occasional reference to the idea of European Integration. Albeit the exiles failed to integrate the nations they spoke for, they established closer and better informed transnational ties bound to affect European politics in the years to come.
http://dx.doi.org/10.14195/1647-6336_13_6
|
topic |
small powers exile World War II foreign policy integration |
url |
https://impactum-journals.uc.pt/debatereuropa/article/view/3685 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT pavoljakubec london19401945aeuropeinminiaturethecaseofnorwegianpolishandczechoslovakexiles |
_version_ |
1724455119753314304 |