Algorithmic approach to the lymphatic leak after vascular reconstruction: a systematic review

Background To date, there are no consensus guidelines for management of lymphatic leak in groin vascular reconstruction patients. The goal of this study is to review the relevant literature to determine alternatives for treatment and to design an evidence-based algorithm to minimize cost and morbidi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter John Nicksic, Kevin Michael Condit, Harry Siva Nayar, Brett Foster Michelotti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons 2021-07-01
Series:Archives of Plastic Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.e-aps.org/upload/pdf/aps-2020-02075.pdf
id doaj-0bcb379f000e4c25ab45ed2fc9a36b31
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0bcb379f000e4c25ab45ed2fc9a36b312021-07-26T00:26:26ZengKorean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeonsArchives of Plastic Surgery2234-61632234-61712021-07-0148440440910.5999/aps.2020.020753875Algorithmic approach to the lymphatic leak after vascular reconstruction: a systematic reviewPeter John Nicksic0Kevin Michael Condit1Harry Siva Nayar2Brett Foster Michelotti3 Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics, Madison, WI, USA Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics, Madison, WI, USA Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics, Madison, WI, USA Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics, Madison, WI, USABackground To date, there are no consensus guidelines for management of lymphatic leak in groin vascular reconstruction patients. The goal of this study is to review the relevant literature to determine alternatives for treatment and to design an evidence-based algorithm to minimize cost and morbidity and maximize efficacy. Methods A systematic review of the literature was conducted per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol. Two independent reviewers applied agreed-upon inclusion and exclusion criteria to eligible records. Studies that included patients who underwent groin dissection for oncologic diagnoses and level 5 data were excluded. Interventions were then categorized by efficacy using predetermined criteria. Results Our search yielded 333 records, of which eight studies were included. In four studies, the success of lymphatic ligation ranged from 75% to 100%, with average days to resolution ranging from 0 to 9. Conservative management in the form of elevation, compression, and bedrest may prolong time to resolution of lymphatic leak (14–24 days) and therefore cost. Conclusions The majority of patients should be offered early operative intervention in the form of lymphatic ligation with or without a primary muscle flap. If the patient is not an operative candidate, a trial of conservative management should be attempted before other nonsurgical interventions.http://www.e-aps.org/upload/pdf/aps-2020-02075.pdflymphlymphorrheaalgorithmsblood vessel prosthesis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Peter John Nicksic
Kevin Michael Condit
Harry Siva Nayar
Brett Foster Michelotti
spellingShingle Peter John Nicksic
Kevin Michael Condit
Harry Siva Nayar
Brett Foster Michelotti
Algorithmic approach to the lymphatic leak after vascular reconstruction: a systematic review
Archives of Plastic Surgery
lymph
lymphorrhea
algorithms
blood vessel prosthesis
author_facet Peter John Nicksic
Kevin Michael Condit
Harry Siva Nayar
Brett Foster Michelotti
author_sort Peter John Nicksic
title Algorithmic approach to the lymphatic leak after vascular reconstruction: a systematic review
title_short Algorithmic approach to the lymphatic leak after vascular reconstruction: a systematic review
title_full Algorithmic approach to the lymphatic leak after vascular reconstruction: a systematic review
title_fullStr Algorithmic approach to the lymphatic leak after vascular reconstruction: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Algorithmic approach to the lymphatic leak after vascular reconstruction: a systematic review
title_sort algorithmic approach to the lymphatic leak after vascular reconstruction: a systematic review
publisher Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons
series Archives of Plastic Surgery
issn 2234-6163
2234-6171
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Background To date, there are no consensus guidelines for management of lymphatic leak in groin vascular reconstruction patients. The goal of this study is to review the relevant literature to determine alternatives for treatment and to design an evidence-based algorithm to minimize cost and morbidity and maximize efficacy. Methods A systematic review of the literature was conducted per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol. Two independent reviewers applied agreed-upon inclusion and exclusion criteria to eligible records. Studies that included patients who underwent groin dissection for oncologic diagnoses and level 5 data were excluded. Interventions were then categorized by efficacy using predetermined criteria. Results Our search yielded 333 records, of which eight studies were included. In four studies, the success of lymphatic ligation ranged from 75% to 100%, with average days to resolution ranging from 0 to 9. Conservative management in the form of elevation, compression, and bedrest may prolong time to resolution of lymphatic leak (14–24 days) and therefore cost. Conclusions The majority of patients should be offered early operative intervention in the form of lymphatic ligation with or without a primary muscle flap. If the patient is not an operative candidate, a trial of conservative management should be attempted before other nonsurgical interventions.
topic lymph
lymphorrhea
algorithms
blood vessel prosthesis
url http://www.e-aps.org/upload/pdf/aps-2020-02075.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT peterjohnnicksic algorithmicapproachtothelymphaticleakaftervascularreconstructionasystematicreview
AT kevinmichaelcondit algorithmicapproachtothelymphaticleakaftervascularreconstructionasystematicreview
AT harrysivanayar algorithmicapproachtothelymphaticleakaftervascularreconstructionasystematicreview
AT brettfostermichelotti algorithmicapproachtothelymphaticleakaftervascularreconstructionasystematicreview
_version_ 1721282500673667072