Validation of the care providers version of the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care-measurement tool in Chinese primary care systems

Abstract Background The original Rainbow Model of Integrated Care Measurement Tool (RMIC-MT) is based on the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care (RMIC), which provides a comprehensive theoretical framework for integrated care. To translate and adapt the original care provider version of the RMIC-MT and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yixiang Huang, Paiyi Zhu, Lijin Chen, Xin Wang, Pim Valentijn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-08-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-020-05562-2
id doaj-0bc9cf6409214634b741eb4ebfce1917
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0bc9cf6409214634b741eb4ebfce19172020-11-25T03:07:31ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632020-08-0120111010.1186/s12913-020-05562-2Validation of the care providers version of the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care-measurement tool in Chinese primary care systemsYixiang Huang0Paiyi Zhu1Lijin Chen2Xin Wang3Pim Valentijn4School of Public Health, Health Development Research Center, Sun Yat-Sen UniversitySchool of Public Health, Health Development Research Center, Sun Yat-Sen UniversitySchool of Public Health, Health Development Research Center, Sun Yat-Sen UniversitySchool of Public Health, Health Development Research Center, Sun Yat-Sen UniversityDepartment of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht UniversityAbstract Background The original Rainbow Model of Integrated Care Measurement Tool (RMIC-MT) is based on the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care (RMIC), which provides a comprehensive theoretical framework for integrated care. To translate and adapt the original care provider version of the RMIC-MT and evaluate its psychometric properties by a pilot study in Chinese primary care systems. Methods The translation and adaptation process were performed in four steps, forward and back-translation, experts review and pre-testing. We conducted a cross-sectional study with 1610 community care professionals in all 79 community health stations in the Nanshan district. We analyzed the distribution of responses to each item to study the psychometric sensitivity. Exploratory factor analysis with principal axis extraction method and promax rotation was used to assess the construct validity. Cronbach’s alpha was utilized to ascertain the internal consistency reliability. Lastly, confirmation factor analysis was used to evaluate the exploratory factor analysis model fit. Results During the translation and adaptation process, all 48 items were retained with some detailed modifications. No item was found to have psychometric sensitivity problems. Six factors (person- & community-centeredness, care integration, professional integration, organizational integration, cultural competence and technical competence) with 45 items were determined by exploratory factor analysis, accounting for 61.46% of the total variance. A standard Cronbach’s alpha of 0.940 and significant correlation among all items in the scale (> 0.4) showed good internal consistency reliability of the tool. And, the model passed the majority of goodness-to-fit test by confirmation factor analysis. Conclusions The results showed initial satisfactory psychometric properties for the validation of the Chinese RMIC-MT provider version. Its application in China will promote the development of people-centered integrated primary care. However, further psychometric testing is needed in multiple primary care settings with both public and private community institutes.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-020-05562-2Integrated primary careMeasurement toolCommunity health professionals
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yixiang Huang
Paiyi Zhu
Lijin Chen
Xin Wang
Pim Valentijn
spellingShingle Yixiang Huang
Paiyi Zhu
Lijin Chen
Xin Wang
Pim Valentijn
Validation of the care providers version of the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care-measurement tool in Chinese primary care systems
BMC Health Services Research
Integrated primary care
Measurement tool
Community health professionals
author_facet Yixiang Huang
Paiyi Zhu
Lijin Chen
Xin Wang
Pim Valentijn
author_sort Yixiang Huang
title Validation of the care providers version of the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care-measurement tool in Chinese primary care systems
title_short Validation of the care providers version of the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care-measurement tool in Chinese primary care systems
title_full Validation of the care providers version of the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care-measurement tool in Chinese primary care systems
title_fullStr Validation of the care providers version of the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care-measurement tool in Chinese primary care systems
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the care providers version of the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care-measurement tool in Chinese primary care systems
title_sort validation of the care providers version of the rainbow model of integrated care-measurement tool in chinese primary care systems
publisher BMC
series BMC Health Services Research
issn 1472-6963
publishDate 2020-08-01
description Abstract Background The original Rainbow Model of Integrated Care Measurement Tool (RMIC-MT) is based on the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care (RMIC), which provides a comprehensive theoretical framework for integrated care. To translate and adapt the original care provider version of the RMIC-MT and evaluate its psychometric properties by a pilot study in Chinese primary care systems. Methods The translation and adaptation process were performed in four steps, forward and back-translation, experts review and pre-testing. We conducted a cross-sectional study with 1610 community care professionals in all 79 community health stations in the Nanshan district. We analyzed the distribution of responses to each item to study the psychometric sensitivity. Exploratory factor analysis with principal axis extraction method and promax rotation was used to assess the construct validity. Cronbach’s alpha was utilized to ascertain the internal consistency reliability. Lastly, confirmation factor analysis was used to evaluate the exploratory factor analysis model fit. Results During the translation and adaptation process, all 48 items were retained with some detailed modifications. No item was found to have psychometric sensitivity problems. Six factors (person- & community-centeredness, care integration, professional integration, organizational integration, cultural competence and technical competence) with 45 items were determined by exploratory factor analysis, accounting for 61.46% of the total variance. A standard Cronbach’s alpha of 0.940 and significant correlation among all items in the scale (> 0.4) showed good internal consistency reliability of the tool. And, the model passed the majority of goodness-to-fit test by confirmation factor analysis. Conclusions The results showed initial satisfactory psychometric properties for the validation of the Chinese RMIC-MT provider version. Its application in China will promote the development of people-centered integrated primary care. However, further psychometric testing is needed in multiple primary care settings with both public and private community institutes.
topic Integrated primary care
Measurement tool
Community health professionals
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-020-05562-2
work_keys_str_mv AT yixianghuang validationofthecareprovidersversionoftherainbowmodelofintegratedcaremeasurementtoolinchineseprimarycaresystems
AT paiyizhu validationofthecareprovidersversionoftherainbowmodelofintegratedcaremeasurementtoolinchineseprimarycaresystems
AT lijinchen validationofthecareprovidersversionoftherainbowmodelofintegratedcaremeasurementtoolinchineseprimarycaresystems
AT xinwang validationofthecareprovidersversionoftherainbowmodelofintegratedcaremeasurementtoolinchineseprimarycaresystems
AT pimvalentijn validationofthecareprovidersversionoftherainbowmodelofintegratedcaremeasurementtoolinchineseprimarycaresystems
_version_ 1724670017165852672