Nanoteknik och riskbedömning som nytt kunskapsinnehåll i gymnasiets naturvetenskapliga kurser – en designstudie

Nanoscience and nanotechnology (NST) is a rapidly developing knowledge area, which need incorporating in the school science curricula. The many uncertainties of risks and benefits with NST also open up for using NST as a socio-scientific issue (SSI). We present the two first iterations of a teaching...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Margareta Enghag, Linda Schenk
Format: Article
Language:Danish
Published: University of Oslo 2016-09-01
Series:Nordina: Nordic Studies in Science Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.uio.no/nordina/article/view/2633
id doaj-0bc377346c8a4a57829ba3793d4f45a4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0bc377346c8a4a57829ba3793d4f45a42020-11-25T03:17:33ZdanUniversity of OsloNordina: Nordic Studies in Science Education1504-45561894-12572016-09-0112210.5617/nordina.2633Nanoteknik och riskbedömning som nytt kunskapsinnehåll i gymnasiets naturvetenskapliga kurser – en designstudieMargareta Enghag0Linda Schenk1Stockholm UniversityRoyal Institute of Technology, StockholmNanoscience and nanotechnology (NST) is a rapidly developing knowledge area, which need incorporating in the school science curricula. The many uncertainties of risks and benefits with NST also open up for using NST as a socio-scientific issue (SSI). We present the two first iterations of a teaching sequence aimed for upper secondary school physics. The sequence contains content knowledge on NST and risk assessment and employs traditional classroom teaching, and a debate about NST as a SSI. The aims are to explore 1) students assessments of risks and benefits with NST, and 2) what design principles for teaching nanoscience and risk assessment that emerge as significant. We found that the risk assessment exercise stimulated student argumentation and discussion during the SSI debate. The teachers preferred to focus on the SSI activity, but found it challenging to fit NST content knowledge into the traditional teaching approach. Design principles found are discussed. https://journals.uio.no/nordina/article/view/2633nanoscience and nanotechnologysocioscientific issues16-18educational research design
collection DOAJ
language Danish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Margareta Enghag
Linda Schenk
spellingShingle Margareta Enghag
Linda Schenk
Nanoteknik och riskbedömning som nytt kunskapsinnehåll i gymnasiets naturvetenskapliga kurser – en designstudie
Nordina: Nordic Studies in Science Education
nanoscience and nanotechnology
socioscientific issues
16-18
educational research design
author_facet Margareta Enghag
Linda Schenk
author_sort Margareta Enghag
title Nanoteknik och riskbedömning som nytt kunskapsinnehåll i gymnasiets naturvetenskapliga kurser – en designstudie
title_short Nanoteknik och riskbedömning som nytt kunskapsinnehåll i gymnasiets naturvetenskapliga kurser – en designstudie
title_full Nanoteknik och riskbedömning som nytt kunskapsinnehåll i gymnasiets naturvetenskapliga kurser – en designstudie
title_fullStr Nanoteknik och riskbedömning som nytt kunskapsinnehåll i gymnasiets naturvetenskapliga kurser – en designstudie
title_full_unstemmed Nanoteknik och riskbedömning som nytt kunskapsinnehåll i gymnasiets naturvetenskapliga kurser – en designstudie
title_sort nanoteknik och riskbedömning som nytt kunskapsinnehåll i gymnasiets naturvetenskapliga kurser – en designstudie
publisher University of Oslo
series Nordina: Nordic Studies in Science Education
issn 1504-4556
1894-1257
publishDate 2016-09-01
description Nanoscience and nanotechnology (NST) is a rapidly developing knowledge area, which need incorporating in the school science curricula. The many uncertainties of risks and benefits with NST also open up for using NST as a socio-scientific issue (SSI). We present the two first iterations of a teaching sequence aimed for upper secondary school physics. The sequence contains content knowledge on NST and risk assessment and employs traditional classroom teaching, and a debate about NST as a SSI. The aims are to explore 1) students assessments of risks and benefits with NST, and 2) what design principles for teaching nanoscience and risk assessment that emerge as significant. We found that the risk assessment exercise stimulated student argumentation and discussion during the SSI debate. The teachers preferred to focus on the SSI activity, but found it challenging to fit NST content knowledge into the traditional teaching approach. Design principles found are discussed.
topic nanoscience and nanotechnology
socioscientific issues
16-18
educational research design
url https://journals.uio.no/nordina/article/view/2633
work_keys_str_mv AT margaretaenghag nanoteknikochriskbedomningsomnyttkunskapsinnehalligymnasietsnaturvetenskapligakurserendesignstudie
AT lindaschenk nanoteknikochriskbedomningsomnyttkunskapsinnehalligymnasietsnaturvetenskapligakurserendesignstudie
_version_ 1724631557772148736