Nanoteknik och riskbedömning som nytt kunskapsinnehåll i gymnasiets naturvetenskapliga kurser – en designstudie
Nanoscience and nanotechnology (NST) is a rapidly developing knowledge area, which need incorporating in the school science curricula. The many uncertainties of risks and benefits with NST also open up for using NST as a socio-scientific issue (SSI). We present the two first iterations of a teaching...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Danish |
Published: |
University of Oslo
2016-09-01
|
Series: | Nordina: Nordic Studies in Science Education |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journals.uio.no/nordina/article/view/2633 |
id |
doaj-0bc377346c8a4a57829ba3793d4f45a4 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0bc377346c8a4a57829ba3793d4f45a42020-11-25T03:17:33ZdanUniversity of OsloNordina: Nordic Studies in Science Education1504-45561894-12572016-09-0112210.5617/nordina.2633Nanoteknik och riskbedömning som nytt kunskapsinnehåll i gymnasiets naturvetenskapliga kurser – en designstudieMargareta Enghag0Linda Schenk1Stockholm UniversityRoyal Institute of Technology, StockholmNanoscience and nanotechnology (NST) is a rapidly developing knowledge area, which need incorporating in the school science curricula. The many uncertainties of risks and benefits with NST also open up for using NST as a socio-scientific issue (SSI). We present the two first iterations of a teaching sequence aimed for upper secondary school physics. The sequence contains content knowledge on NST and risk assessment and employs traditional classroom teaching, and a debate about NST as a SSI. The aims are to explore 1) students assessments of risks and benefits with NST, and 2) what design principles for teaching nanoscience and risk assessment that emerge as significant. We found that the risk assessment exercise stimulated student argumentation and discussion during the SSI debate. The teachers preferred to focus on the SSI activity, but found it challenging to fit NST content knowledge into the traditional teaching approach. Design principles found are discussed. https://journals.uio.no/nordina/article/view/2633nanoscience and nanotechnologysocioscientific issues16-18educational research design |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Danish |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Margareta Enghag Linda Schenk |
spellingShingle |
Margareta Enghag Linda Schenk Nanoteknik och riskbedömning som nytt kunskapsinnehåll i gymnasiets naturvetenskapliga kurser – en designstudie Nordina: Nordic Studies in Science Education nanoscience and nanotechnology socioscientific issues 16-18 educational research design |
author_facet |
Margareta Enghag Linda Schenk |
author_sort |
Margareta Enghag |
title |
Nanoteknik och riskbedömning som nytt kunskapsinnehåll i gymnasiets naturvetenskapliga kurser – en designstudie |
title_short |
Nanoteknik och riskbedömning som nytt kunskapsinnehåll i gymnasiets naturvetenskapliga kurser – en designstudie |
title_full |
Nanoteknik och riskbedömning som nytt kunskapsinnehåll i gymnasiets naturvetenskapliga kurser – en designstudie |
title_fullStr |
Nanoteknik och riskbedömning som nytt kunskapsinnehåll i gymnasiets naturvetenskapliga kurser – en designstudie |
title_full_unstemmed |
Nanoteknik och riskbedömning som nytt kunskapsinnehåll i gymnasiets naturvetenskapliga kurser – en designstudie |
title_sort |
nanoteknik och riskbedömning som nytt kunskapsinnehåll i gymnasiets naturvetenskapliga kurser – en designstudie |
publisher |
University of Oslo |
series |
Nordina: Nordic Studies in Science Education |
issn |
1504-4556 1894-1257 |
publishDate |
2016-09-01 |
description |
Nanoscience and nanotechnology (NST) is a rapidly developing knowledge area, which need incorporating in the school science curricula. The many uncertainties of risks and benefits with NST also open up for using NST as a socio-scientific issue (SSI). We present the two first iterations of a teaching sequence aimed for upper secondary school physics. The sequence contains content knowledge on NST and risk assessment and employs traditional classroom teaching, and a debate about NST as a SSI. The aims are to explore 1) students assessments of risks and benefits with NST, and 2) what design principles for teaching nanoscience and risk assessment that emerge as significant. We found that the risk assessment exercise stimulated student argumentation and discussion during the SSI debate. The teachers preferred to focus on the SSI activity, but found it challenging to fit NST content knowledge into the traditional teaching approach. Design principles found are discussed.
|
topic |
nanoscience and nanotechnology socioscientific issues 16-18 educational research design |
url |
https://journals.uio.no/nordina/article/view/2633 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT margaretaenghag nanoteknikochriskbedomningsomnyttkunskapsinnehalligymnasietsnaturvetenskapligakurserendesignstudie AT lindaschenk nanoteknikochriskbedomningsomnyttkunskapsinnehalligymnasietsnaturvetenskapligakurserendesignstudie |
_version_ |
1724631557772148736 |