What Happens After the Intervention? Results From Teacher Professional Development in Employing Mathematical Reasoning Tasks and a Supporting Rubric
The lasting effects of teacher professional development (PD) are seldom examined. We investigated whether 44 teachers and their Grade 5 and 6 primary classes continued working with tasks for mathematical reasoning and employing a rubric after the PD finished. Questionnaires for students and teachers...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019-01-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Education |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/feduc.2018.00113/full |
id |
doaj-0bc375d6375e4c43b505e7f376ca7de1 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0bc375d6375e4c43b505e7f376ca7de12020-11-25T02:31:42ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Education2504-284X2019-01-01310.3389/feduc.2018.00113413004What Happens After the Intervention? Results From Teacher Professional Development in Employing Mathematical Reasoning Tasks and a Supporting RubricRobbert Smit0Kurt Hess1Patricia Bachmann2Verena Blum3Thomas Birri4Research and Development, University of Teacher Education St. Gallen, St. Gallen, SwitzerlandResearch and Development, University of Teacher Education Zug, Zug, SwitzerlandResearch and Development, University of Teacher Education St. Gallen, St. Gallen, SwitzerlandResearch and Development, University of Teacher Education Zug, Zug, SwitzerlandResearch and Development, University of Teacher Education St. Gallen, St. Gallen, SwitzerlandThe lasting effects of teacher professional development (PD) are seldom examined. We investigated whether 44 teachers and their Grade 5 and 6 primary classes continued working with tasks for mathematical reasoning and employing a rubric after the PD finished. Questionnaires for students and teachers were administered before the intervention, at the end of the intervention, and 5 months later. The results of the longitudinal quantitative analyses with supplementary qualitative interpretations indicated that the mathematical reasoning features of the PD showed more sustainable effects than the use of the rubric. Explorative findings suggest that this outcome may be related to the teachers' pedagogical content knowledge.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/feduc.2018.00113/fullprofessional developmentsustainabilityrubricsprimary schoolmathematical reasoning |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Robbert Smit Kurt Hess Patricia Bachmann Verena Blum Thomas Birri |
spellingShingle |
Robbert Smit Kurt Hess Patricia Bachmann Verena Blum Thomas Birri What Happens After the Intervention? Results From Teacher Professional Development in Employing Mathematical Reasoning Tasks and a Supporting Rubric Frontiers in Education professional development sustainability rubrics primary school mathematical reasoning |
author_facet |
Robbert Smit Kurt Hess Patricia Bachmann Verena Blum Thomas Birri |
author_sort |
Robbert Smit |
title |
What Happens After the Intervention? Results From Teacher Professional Development in Employing Mathematical Reasoning Tasks and a Supporting Rubric |
title_short |
What Happens After the Intervention? Results From Teacher Professional Development in Employing Mathematical Reasoning Tasks and a Supporting Rubric |
title_full |
What Happens After the Intervention? Results From Teacher Professional Development in Employing Mathematical Reasoning Tasks and a Supporting Rubric |
title_fullStr |
What Happens After the Intervention? Results From Teacher Professional Development in Employing Mathematical Reasoning Tasks and a Supporting Rubric |
title_full_unstemmed |
What Happens After the Intervention? Results From Teacher Professional Development in Employing Mathematical Reasoning Tasks and a Supporting Rubric |
title_sort |
what happens after the intervention? results from teacher professional development in employing mathematical reasoning tasks and a supporting rubric |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Education |
issn |
2504-284X |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
The lasting effects of teacher professional development (PD) are seldom examined. We investigated whether 44 teachers and their Grade 5 and 6 primary classes continued working with tasks for mathematical reasoning and employing a rubric after the PD finished. Questionnaires for students and teachers were administered before the intervention, at the end of the intervention, and 5 months later. The results of the longitudinal quantitative analyses with supplementary qualitative interpretations indicated that the mathematical reasoning features of the PD showed more sustainable effects than the use of the rubric. Explorative findings suggest that this outcome may be related to the teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. |
topic |
professional development sustainability rubrics primary school mathematical reasoning |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/feduc.2018.00113/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT robbertsmit whathappensaftertheinterventionresultsfromteacherprofessionaldevelopmentinemployingmathematicalreasoningtasksandasupportingrubric AT kurthess whathappensaftertheinterventionresultsfromteacherprofessionaldevelopmentinemployingmathematicalreasoningtasksandasupportingrubric AT patriciabachmann whathappensaftertheinterventionresultsfromteacherprofessionaldevelopmentinemployingmathematicalreasoningtasksandasupportingrubric AT verenablum whathappensaftertheinterventionresultsfromteacherprofessionaldevelopmentinemployingmathematicalreasoningtasksandasupportingrubric AT thomasbirri whathappensaftertheinterventionresultsfromteacherprofessionaldevelopmentinemployingmathematicalreasoningtasksandasupportingrubric |
_version_ |
1724822597217026048 |